"Can we use a biomarker detection algorithm to measure the effectiveness of 14-channel neurofeedback in dyslexia?"

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Günet Eroğlu, Raja Abou Harb
{"title":"\"Can we use a biomarker detection algorithm to measure the effectiveness of 14-channel neurofeedback in dyslexia?\"","authors":"Günet Eroğlu, Raja Abou Harb","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2025.2545272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dyslexia, one of children's most common neurological diversities, primarily manifests as a reduced reading ability. Genetic factors contribute to dyslexia, with contemporary theories attributing it to a delay in left hemispheric lateralization that reduces effective reading and writing skills. To assist dyslexic children, smartphone application, Auto Train Brain, has been developed to enhance reading comprehension and speed. Previously, the efficacy of the mobile application's training program was assessed using psychometric tests; however, our study employed a biomarker detection software to evaluate the neurofeedback's impact. Machine learning (ML) techniques have recently gained traction in differentiating between dyslexia and typically developing children (TDC). The dataset of this study consists of 100 sessions of 2-minute resting-state eyes-open 14-channel Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) data from 100 children with dyslexia and 100 TDC. Therefore, the dyslexia biomarker detection software assessed the efficacy of the 14-channel neurofeedback administered via Auto Train Brain. Results showed significant improvement in electrophysiological normalization, increasing from 30% in the first 20 sessions to 61% by the end of the training. A two-proportion Z-test confirmed this improvement was statistically significant (Z = -3.96, <i>p</i> = 0.00007), particularly between the 1-20 and 1-60 session intervals (Z = -2.66, <i>p</i> = 0.0079).</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2025.2545272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dyslexia, one of children's most common neurological diversities, primarily manifests as a reduced reading ability. Genetic factors contribute to dyslexia, with contemporary theories attributing it to a delay in left hemispheric lateralization that reduces effective reading and writing skills. To assist dyslexic children, smartphone application, Auto Train Brain, has been developed to enhance reading comprehension and speed. Previously, the efficacy of the mobile application's training program was assessed using psychometric tests; however, our study employed a biomarker detection software to evaluate the neurofeedback's impact. Machine learning (ML) techniques have recently gained traction in differentiating between dyslexia and typically developing children (TDC). The dataset of this study consists of 100 sessions of 2-minute resting-state eyes-open 14-channel Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) data from 100 children with dyslexia and 100 TDC. Therefore, the dyslexia biomarker detection software assessed the efficacy of the 14-channel neurofeedback administered via Auto Train Brain. Results showed significant improvement in electrophysiological normalization, increasing from 30% in the first 20 sessions to 61% by the end of the training. A two-proportion Z-test confirmed this improvement was statistically significant (Z = -3.96, p = 0.00007), particularly between the 1-20 and 1-60 session intervals (Z = -2.66, p = 0.0079).

“我们能否使用生物标志物检测算法来衡量14通道神经反馈在阅读障碍中的有效性?”
阅读障碍是儿童最常见的神经系统障碍之一,主要表现为阅读能力下降。遗传因素会导致阅读障碍,当代理论将其归因于左半球偏侧化的延迟,从而降低了有效的阅读和写作技能。为了帮助有阅读困难的儿童,我们开发了智能手机应用程序Auto Train Brain,以提高阅读理解和速度。以前,移动应用程序的培训计划的有效性是通过心理测试来评估的;然而,我们的研究采用生物标志物检测软件来评估神经反馈的影响。机器学习(ML)技术最近在区分阅读障碍和正常发育儿童(TDC)方面获得了关注。本研究的数据集包括100名阅读障碍儿童和100名TDC儿童的100次2分钟静息状态睁开眼睛的14通道定量脑电图(QEEG)数据。因此,阅读障碍生物标志物检测软件评估了通过Auto Train Brain给予的14通道神经反馈的有效性。结果显示,电生理正常化有了显著改善,从前20次训练的30%增加到训练结束时的61%。双比例Z检验证实了这种改善在统计学上是显著的(Z = -3.96, p = 0.00007),特别是在1-20和1-60次会话间隔之间(Z = -2.66, p = 0.0079)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信