The paradox of AI accelerationism and the promise of public interest AI

IF 45.8 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Science Pub Date : 2025-10-02 DOI:10.1126/science.aeb5789
Chinasa T. Okolo
{"title":"The paradox of AI accelerationism and the promise of public interest AI","authors":"Chinasa T. Okolo","doi":"10.1126/science.aeb5789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21678,"journal":{"name":"Science","volume":"390 6768","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":45.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aeb5789","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
人工智能加速主义的悖论与公共利益人工智能的承诺
在过去的三年里,人工智能(AI)的发展应该不受限制地加速,以推动彻底的社会变革——这种现象被称为人工智能加速主义——的想法在硅谷得到了广泛的关注。这种信念最突出的形式被称为“有效加速主义”,其追随者将人工智能的无限制进步视为人类问题的解决方案。植根于加速主义这一更广泛的政治意识形态,这一运动将自己定位为“人工智能末日论者”或“减速论者”的对立面,后者主张人工智能的安全性和缓慢、谨慎的发展。有效的加速论者往往不理会对存在风险的担忧,认为技术停滞比不受控制的进步更危险。公益人工智能颠覆了人工智能加速主义,促进了更公平、可持续和民主问责的技术进步。这种方法通过将人工智能与公共价值观(而不仅仅是私人利益)结合起来,直接解决了不受监管的加速带来的风险和潜在危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science
Science 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
61.10
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Science is a leading outlet for scientific news, commentary, and cutting-edge research. Through its print and online incarnations, Science reaches an estimated worldwide readership of more than one million. Science’s authorship is global too, and its articles consistently rank among the world's most cited research. Science serves as a forum for discussion of important issues related to the advancement of science by publishing material on which a consensus has been reached as well as including the presentation of minority or conflicting points of view. Accordingly, all articles published in Science—including editorials, news and comment, and book reviews—are signed and reflect the individual views of the authors and not official points of view adopted by AAAS or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Science seeks to publish those papers that are most influential in their fields or across fields and that will significantly advance scientific understanding. Selected papers should present novel and broadly important data, syntheses, or concepts. They should merit recognition by the wider scientific community and general public provided by publication in Science, beyond that provided by specialty journals. Science welcomes submissions from all fields of science and from any source. The editors are committed to the prompt evaluation and publication of submitted papers while upholding high standards that support reproducibility of published research. Science is published weekly; selected papers are published online ahead of print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信