Spaces of Belonging: Educational Researchers' Experiences in an Online Community of Practice.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Aliza Asbell-Yehuda, Parastoo Sharif-Esfahani, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella, Cori Schmitz, Rosemary Lysaght, Andrea Duncan, Kirsten Smith
{"title":"Spaces of Belonging: Educational Researchers' Experiences in an Online Community of Practice.","authors":"Aliza Asbell-Yehuda, Parastoo Sharif-Esfahani, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella, Cori Schmitz, Rosemary Lysaght, Andrea Duncan, Kirsten Smith","doi":"10.1177/00084174251377843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> The Research on Education Committee of the Association of Canadian Occupational Therapy University Programs (ACOTUP) hosts an educational research community of practice (CoP). Occupational therapy educators across Canada meet through this CoP to network and advance research on education. While the literature has noted benefits of participating in a CoP for the professional development of occupational therapists, there is a paucity of studies focusing on educational researchers' participation in a CoP. <b>Purpose.</b> This study aimed to examine CoP members' perceptions of the value of, and barriers to, participation in an educational research CoP. <b>Method.</b> A mixed methods design, consisting of an online survey followed by focus groups, was employed to gain insight into participants' perspectives and experiences of involvement in the CoP. Data were analyzed inductively and deductively using collaborative qualitative analysis. <b>Findings.</b> Members identified benefits of participation arising from networking and being a part of a supportive community. They described gaining new insights, social relationships, and inspiration to continue their pedagogical research. The data also highlighted limitations to participation and suggested ways to enhance meaningful engagement within a CoP. <b>Conclusion.</b> The CoP provides value to educators and researchers in supporting their pedagogical practices and professional careers. This knowledge could be leveraged to support its members and other CoPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49097,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","volume":" ","pages":"84174251377843"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174251377843","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The Research on Education Committee of the Association of Canadian Occupational Therapy University Programs (ACOTUP) hosts an educational research community of practice (CoP). Occupational therapy educators across Canada meet through this CoP to network and advance research on education. While the literature has noted benefits of participating in a CoP for the professional development of occupational therapists, there is a paucity of studies focusing on educational researchers' participation in a CoP. Purpose. This study aimed to examine CoP members' perceptions of the value of, and barriers to, participation in an educational research CoP. Method. A mixed methods design, consisting of an online survey followed by focus groups, was employed to gain insight into participants' perspectives and experiences of involvement in the CoP. Data were analyzed inductively and deductively using collaborative qualitative analysis. Findings. Members identified benefits of participation arising from networking and being a part of a supportive community. They described gaining new insights, social relationships, and inspiration to continue their pedagogical research. The data also highlighted limitations to participation and suggested ways to enhance meaningful engagement within a CoP. Conclusion. The CoP provides value to educators and researchers in supporting their pedagogical practices and professional careers. This knowledge could be leveraged to support its members and other CoPs.

归属空间:教育研究者在网络实践社区中的经验。
背景。加拿大职业治疗大学课程协会(ACOTUP)的教育研究委员会主持了一个教育研究实践社区(CoP)。全加拿大的职业治疗教育工作者通过这个CoP聚会,建立网络,推进教育研究。虽然文献已经指出参加CoP对职业治疗师的专业发展有好处,但关注教育研究人员参加CoP的研究却很少。目的。本研究旨在考察缔约方会议成员对参与教育研究缔约方会议的价值和障碍的看法。方法。采用混合方法设计,包括在线调查和焦点小组,以深入了解参与者参与缔约方会议的观点和经验。采用协同定性分析对数据进行归纳和演绎分析。发现。成员们确定了参与网络和成为支持性社区的一部分所带来的好处。他们描述了获得新的见解、社会关系和继续他们的教学研究的灵感。数据还强调了参与的局限性,并提出了在缔约方会议内加强有意义参与的方法。结论。CoP为教育工作者和研究人员提供了价值,支持他们的教学实践和职业生涯。可以利用这些知识来支持其成员和其他缔约方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy was first published in September 1933. Since that time, it has fostered advancement and growth in occupational therapy scholarship. The mission of the journal is to provide a forum for leading-edge occupational therapy scholarship that advances theory, practice, research, and policy. The vision is to be a high-quality scholarly journal that is at the forefront of the science of occupational therapy and a destination journal for the top scholars in the field, globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信