Measuring Self-Stigma Among Romanian Psychiatric Patients: Cultural Adaptation and Further Psychometric Insights for the Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale and the Paradox of Self-Stigma Scale.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Luana-Maria Alexa, Andrei Rusu, Juliette Richetin, Ioana-Maria Latu, Mugur Daniel Ciumăgeanu, Ana-Maria Radu, Camelia Maria Dindelegan, Ciprian Ionuț Băcilă
{"title":"Measuring Self-Stigma Among Romanian Psychiatric Patients: Cultural Adaptation and Further Psychometric Insights for the Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale and the Paradox of Self-Stigma Scale.","authors":"Luana-Maria Alexa, Andrei Rusu, Juliette Richetin, Ioana-Maria Latu, Mugur Daniel Ciumăgeanu, Ana-Maria Radu, Camelia Maria Dindelegan, Ciprian Ionuț Băcilă","doi":"10.1177/01632787251384305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the present study, we aimed to translate and validate two instruments designed to assess self-stigmatization: the <i>Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale</i> and the <i>Paradox of Self-Stigma Scale</i>, among Romanian psychiatric patients. Responses from 326 psychiatric patients (58% women) diagnosed with internalizing and externalizing disorders were collected to evaluate the instruments' structural validity, measurement invariance, reliability, convergent and criterion validity. Confirmatory factor analyses offered support for the intended structure of both instruments and the pattern of associations with the other investigated variables further sustained their validity. Reliability was optimal, as revealed by excellent internal consistency estimates. For the first time, the invariance of these instruments was tested based on gender and psychiatric diagnosis. Our results suggest that both instruments can be confidently used by Romanian specialists, providing an effective toolkit for measuring self-stigmatization related to mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787251384305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787251384305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, we aimed to translate and validate two instruments designed to assess self-stigmatization: the Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale and the Paradox of Self-Stigma Scale, among Romanian psychiatric patients. Responses from 326 psychiatric patients (58% women) diagnosed with internalizing and externalizing disorders were collected to evaluate the instruments' structural validity, measurement invariance, reliability, convergent and criterion validity. Confirmatory factor analyses offered support for the intended structure of both instruments and the pattern of associations with the other investigated variables further sustained their validity. Reliability was optimal, as revealed by excellent internal consistency estimates. For the first time, the invariance of these instruments was tested based on gender and psychiatric diagnosis. Our results suggest that both instruments can be confidently used by Romanian specialists, providing an effective toolkit for measuring self-stigmatization related to mental health.

罗马尼亚精神病患者自我耻辱感的测量:精神疾病自我耻辱感量表和自我耻辱感量表的文化适应和进一步的心理测量学见解。
在本研究中,我们旨在翻译和验证两种旨在评估自我污名化的工具:精神疾病自我污名化量表和自我污名化悖论量表,用于罗马尼亚精神病患者。本研究收集了326例诊断为内化和外化障碍的精神病患者(58%为女性)的反馈,对量表的结构效度、测量不变性、信度、收敛效度和标准效度进行了评估。验证性因素分析为这两种工具的预期结构提供了支持,并且与其他被调查变量的关联模式进一步维持了它们的有效性。可靠性是最优的,正如优秀的内部一致性估计所揭示的那样。这是第一次,这些工具的不变性测试基于性别和精神诊断。我们的研究结果表明,罗马尼亚专家可以自信地使用这两种工具,为测量与心理健康相关的自我污名化提供了有效的工具包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信