Assessing pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and guidelines for sampling and reporting standards from the International Neoadjuvant Kidney Cancer Consortium
James P Blackmur, J C Koen van der Mijn, Anne Y Warren, Lisa Browning, Femke Burgers, Michelle S Hirsch, Payal Kapur, Rohit Mehra, Priya Rao, Sabina Signoretti, Axel Bex, Grant D Stewart, Maurits L van Montfoort, James O Jones
{"title":"Assessing pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and guidelines for sampling and reporting standards from the International Neoadjuvant Kidney Cancer Consortium","authors":"James P Blackmur, J C Koen van der Mijn, Anne Y Warren, Lisa Browning, Femke Burgers, Michelle S Hirsch, Payal Kapur, Rohit Mehra, Priya Rao, Sabina Signoretti, Axel Bex, Grant D Stewart, Maurits L van Montfoort, James O Jones","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00345-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pathological response is a surrogate marker of efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy in various tumour types, but there is no consensus on reporting pathological response for renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to assess the status of pathological response reporting in renal cell carcinoma and develop a recommendation on tissue preparation and response reporting for neoadjuvant treatment. We conducted a systematic review of publications on the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify manuscripts reporting response to pre-surgical therapy in renal cell carcinoma. 119 eligible papers were identified. Only five (4%) studies included details of how pathological response had been assessed. Qualitative statements on residual tumour were common (55 [46%] studies), but only eight (7%) studies used a quantitative assessment of pathological response. Guidelines for tissue preparation and pathological response reporting were reviewed at an international workshop held at the Netherlands Cancer Institute in October, 2024, and further developed through expert discussions. To assess neoadjuvant pathological response, nephrectomy specimens should be sampled with the use of a standardised baseline approach with consideration for more extensive sampling. Microscopic assessment should quantify the residual viable tumour in 10% intervals and greatest linear extent. Clinical details, including the neoadjuvant therapy received, should accompany the pathological assessment. In this systematic review, we describe a standardised method for assessment and reporting pathological response, initially intended for use in clinical trials or research settings. These guidelines will help investigators to assess whether the degree of pathological response is linked to survival outcomes and will inform future standard reporting practices.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00345-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pathological response is a surrogate marker of efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy in various tumour types, but there is no consensus on reporting pathological response for renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to assess the status of pathological response reporting in renal cell carcinoma and develop a recommendation on tissue preparation and response reporting for neoadjuvant treatment. We conducted a systematic review of publications on the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify manuscripts reporting response to pre-surgical therapy in renal cell carcinoma. 119 eligible papers were identified. Only five (4%) studies included details of how pathological response had been assessed. Qualitative statements on residual tumour were common (55 [46%] studies), but only eight (7%) studies used a quantitative assessment of pathological response. Guidelines for tissue preparation and pathological response reporting were reviewed at an international workshop held at the Netherlands Cancer Institute in October, 2024, and further developed through expert discussions. To assess neoadjuvant pathological response, nephrectomy specimens should be sampled with the use of a standardised baseline approach with consideration for more extensive sampling. Microscopic assessment should quantify the residual viable tumour in 10% intervals and greatest linear extent. Clinical details, including the neoadjuvant therapy received, should accompany the pathological assessment. In this systematic review, we describe a standardised method for assessment and reporting pathological response, initially intended for use in clinical trials or research settings. These guidelines will help investigators to assess whether the degree of pathological response is linked to survival outcomes and will inform future standard reporting practices.
病理反应是各种肿瘤类型新辅助治疗疗效的替代指标,但对于肾细胞癌的病理反应报道尚无共识。我们旨在评估肾细胞癌病理反应报告的现状,并对新辅助治疗的组织准备和反应报告提出建议。我们对PubMed和Web of Science数据库上的出版物进行了系统回顾,以确定报告肾细胞癌术前治疗反应的手稿。筛选出119篇符合条件的论文。只有5项(4%)研究包含了如何评估病理反应的细节。残留肿瘤的定性描述很常见(55项[46%]研究),但只有8项(7%)研究使用了病理反应的定量评估。2024年10月在荷兰癌症研究所举行的国际研讨会上审查了组织制备和病理反应报告指南,并通过专家讨论进一步发展。为了评估新辅助的病理反应,应采用标准化的基线方法对肾切除术标本进行采样,并考虑更广泛的采样。显微镜评估应以10%的间隔和最大的线性程度量化残余活肿瘤。临床细节,包括接受的新辅助治疗,应伴随病理评估。在这篇系统综述中,我们描述了一种评估和报告病理反应的标准化方法,最初打算用于临床试验或研究环境。这些指南将帮助研究人员评估病理反应的程度是否与生存结果有关,并将为未来的标准报告实践提供信息。