Interprofessional communication in the ambulatory health sector in Germany: a multi-perspective cross-sectional study (interprof HOME).

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
R A Dano, L Bremer, C A Müller, A L Mazur, B Tetzlaff, A M Knieps, M Scherer, K Balzer, T Friede, E Hummers, S Köpke
{"title":"Interprofessional communication in the ambulatory health sector in Germany: a multi-perspective cross-sectional study (<i>interprof</i> HOME).","authors":"R A Dano, L Bremer, C A Müller, A L Mazur, B Tetzlaff, A M Knieps, M Scherer, K Balzer, T Friede, E Hummers, S Köpke","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2025.2558633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comprehensible interprofessional (IP) communication is a key element for effective collaboration. Focussing on person-centeredness in healthcare, healthcare providers such as registered nurses (RN), general practitioners (GP), and therapists (TH) should ensure transparency in patient-related information to promote safety and satisfaction. In Germany, IP communication is challenging, especially in home care. This survey constitutes the quantitative sub-study of the mixed-methods study <i>interprof</i> HOME and aims to describe the situation of IP communication focussing on the home care setting. We surveyed RNs, GPs, THs, persons receiving home care (PRHC) and relatives (RL) in Germany. Data were analyzed descriptively. 244 participants (PRHC/RL <i>n</i> = 38; RN <i>n</i> = 75; GP <i>n</i> = 39; TH <i>n</i> = 92) took part in the survey (response rates: RN: 12%; GP: 6%; TH: 28%; response rate from PRHC/RL not determinable due to indirect recruitment). Results show that PRHC/RLs are dissatisfied (45%) with the collaboration between RNs and GPs and feel their efforts only seldom served their well-being (50%). Interventions to promote IP communication favored by RNs, GPs and THs included interprofessional case conferences or joint home visits. Overall, healthcare providers are open for improvement. Nevertheless, they are critical for the implementation of the interventions, e.g. due to lack of time resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2025.2558633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensible interprofessional (IP) communication is a key element for effective collaboration. Focussing on person-centeredness in healthcare, healthcare providers such as registered nurses (RN), general practitioners (GP), and therapists (TH) should ensure transparency in patient-related information to promote safety and satisfaction. In Germany, IP communication is challenging, especially in home care. This survey constitutes the quantitative sub-study of the mixed-methods study interprof HOME and aims to describe the situation of IP communication focussing on the home care setting. We surveyed RNs, GPs, THs, persons receiving home care (PRHC) and relatives (RL) in Germany. Data were analyzed descriptively. 244 participants (PRHC/RL n = 38; RN n = 75; GP n = 39; TH n = 92) took part in the survey (response rates: RN: 12%; GP: 6%; TH: 28%; response rate from PRHC/RL not determinable due to indirect recruitment). Results show that PRHC/RLs are dissatisfied (45%) with the collaboration between RNs and GPs and feel their efforts only seldom served their well-being (50%). Interventions to promote IP communication favored by RNs, GPs and THs included interprofessional case conferences or joint home visits. Overall, healthcare providers are open for improvement. Nevertheless, they are critical for the implementation of the interventions, e.g. due to lack of time resources.

德国流动卫生部门的跨专业交流:一项多视角横断面研究(interprofhome)。
可理解的跨专业(IP)通信是有效协作的关键要素。注重以人为本的医疗保健,医疗保健提供者,如注册护士(RN)、全科医生(GP)和治疗师(TH)应该确保患者相关信息的透明度,以提高安全性和满意度。在德国,IP通信具有挑战性,特别是在家庭护理方面。本调查构成混合方法研究interprof HOME的定量子研究,旨在描述以家庭护理环境为重点的IP通信情况。我们调查了德国的注册护士、全科医生、护士、接受家庭护理的人(PRHC)和亲属(RL)。对数据进行描述性分析。244名参与者(PRHC/RL n = 38; RN n = 75; GP n = 39; TH n = 92)参加了调查(回复率:RN: 12%; GP: 6%; TH: 28%;由于间接招募,PRHC/RL的回复率无法确定)。结果显示,PRHC/ rl对注册护士和全科医生的合作不满意(45%),认为他们的努力很少能满足他们的幸福(50%)。促进知识产权交流的干预措施包括跨专业病例会议或联合家访。总体而言,医疗保健提供者对改进持开放态度。然而,由于缺乏时间资源,它们对于实施干预措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信