Optimizing the Routine Use of Clinical Guidelines by Addition of Supplements (Probiotics and/or Bismuth) to Helicobacter pylori Eradication Protocols in a Clarithromycin Resistant and Tetracycline/Bismuth Naive Area: A Real-World Data Retrospective Analysis of 402 Cases (2016-24) in a Single Gastroenterology Unit.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
András Gelley, Noémi Kéri, Péter Birinyi, Kinga Komka, Vajk Hardy, László Döngölő, Dóra Szeli, Ibolya Czegle
{"title":"Optimizing the Routine Use of Clinical Guidelines by Addition of Supplements (Probiotics and/or Bismuth) to <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Eradication Protocols in a Clarithromycin Resistant and Tetracycline/Bismuth Naive Area: A Real-World Data Retrospective Analysis of 402 Cases (2016-24) in a Single Gastroenterology Unit.","authors":"András Gelley, Noémi Kéri, Péter Birinyi, Kinga Komka, Vajk Hardy, László Döngölő, Dóra Szeli, Ibolya Czegle","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14090870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The official current guideline for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) eradication is to use tetracycline-bismuth-based protocols as first line treatment due to the increasing incidence of clarithromycin resistance in the last decade. The unavailability of tetracycline and bismuth-containing medicines, however, is an issue in many countries, limiting the routine use of these protocols. The value of using additional probiotics in eradication protocols is also unclear. Direct comparison data on the effect of available bismuth compounds and different probiotic strains on eradication outcome are limited. <b>Goal:</b> The aim of our investigation was to find optimal eradication protocols, supplementations and treatment duration for routine clinical use in our gastroenterology unit, located in a highly clarithromycin-resistant and tetracycline-bismuth-naïve area. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective real-world data analysis of 402 <i>H. pylori</i> positive patients between 2016 and 2024. <i>H. pylori</i> infection was diagnosed using histological examination of gastroscopy samples obtained from the gastric antrum. For the evaluation of treatment success or failure, <sup>14</sup>C breath tests and stool <i>H. pylori</i> antigen tests were performed. Data on patient characteristics and treatment protocols were collected from our electronic patient record system, and treatment success was compared between the different treatment regimes. <b>Results:</b> Despite the regional clarithromycin resistance, supplementing clarithromycin-based regimens with bismuth and probiotic during the 14-day treatment duration showed a high and comparable cure rate when compared to tetracycline-based regimens, which are the current first-line therapies. When tetracycline-based combination is available, it is recommended to use it with an additional probiotic to achieve the best possible outcome. Comparison of the effect of available bismuth preparations on treatment success showed no significant difference. Generally, probiotic-containing protocols are more successful, compared to those treatments without this supplement. There was no statistical difference in the cure rates amongst the four probiotic strains used, where sample size allowed statistical analysis. Furthermore, supplementation with probiotics <i>Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC PTA 6475</i> or <i>Lactobacillus reuteri Protectis<sup>®</sup> DSM 17938</i> showed promising high treatment success rates (85.2% and 100.0%, respectively) in our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090870","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The official current guideline for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication is to use tetracycline-bismuth-based protocols as first line treatment due to the increasing incidence of clarithromycin resistance in the last decade. The unavailability of tetracycline and bismuth-containing medicines, however, is an issue in many countries, limiting the routine use of these protocols. The value of using additional probiotics in eradication protocols is also unclear. Direct comparison data on the effect of available bismuth compounds and different probiotic strains on eradication outcome are limited. Goal: The aim of our investigation was to find optimal eradication protocols, supplementations and treatment duration for routine clinical use in our gastroenterology unit, located in a highly clarithromycin-resistant and tetracycline-bismuth-naïve area. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective real-world data analysis of 402 H. pylori positive patients between 2016 and 2024. H. pylori infection was diagnosed using histological examination of gastroscopy samples obtained from the gastric antrum. For the evaluation of treatment success or failure, 14C breath tests and stool H. pylori antigen tests were performed. Data on patient characteristics and treatment protocols were collected from our electronic patient record system, and treatment success was compared between the different treatment regimes. Results: Despite the regional clarithromycin resistance, supplementing clarithromycin-based regimens with bismuth and probiotic during the 14-day treatment duration showed a high and comparable cure rate when compared to tetracycline-based regimens, which are the current first-line therapies. When tetracycline-based combination is available, it is recommended to use it with an additional probiotic to achieve the best possible outcome. Comparison of the effect of available bismuth preparations on treatment success showed no significant difference. Generally, probiotic-containing protocols are more successful, compared to those treatments without this supplement. There was no statistical difference in the cure rates amongst the four probiotic strains used, where sample size allowed statistical analysis. Furthermore, supplementation with probiotics Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC PTA 6475 or Lactobacillus reuteri Protectis® DSM 17938 showed promising high treatment success rates (85.2% and 100.0%, respectively) in our study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过在克拉霉素耐药和四环素/铋缺乏地区的幽门螺杆菌根除方案中添加补充剂(益生菌和/或铋)来优化临床指南的常规使用:2016-24年在一个胃肠病学单位402例的真实世界数据回顾性分析。
背景:由于过去十年来克拉霉素耐药发生率的增加,目前官方的根除幽门螺杆菌的指南是使用四环素-铋为基础的方案作为一线治疗。然而,在许多国家缺乏四环素和含铋药物是一个问题,限制了这些方案的常规使用。在根除方案中使用额外益生菌的价值也不清楚。关于有效铋化合物和不同益生菌菌株对根除结果影响的直接比较数据有限。目的:我们调查的目的是在我们位于克拉霉素高度耐药和tetracycline-bismuth-naïve地区的胃肠病学单位找到常规临床使用的最佳根除方案,补充和治疗时间。材料和方法:我们对2016年至2024年间402例幽门螺杆菌阳性患者进行了回顾性的现实数据分析。幽门螺杆菌感染的诊断是通过胃镜检查从胃窦获得的样本的组织学检查。为评估治疗成功或失败,进行14C呼气试验和粪便幽门螺杆菌抗原试验。从我们的电子病历系统中收集患者特征和治疗方案的数据,并比较不同治疗方案之间的治疗成功率。结果:尽管存在局部克拉霉素耐药,但与目前一线治疗的四环素方案相比,在14天的治疗期间,以铋和益生菌补充克拉霉素方案的治愈率较高且相当。当以四环素为基础的组合可用时,建议与额外的益生菌一起使用,以达到最佳效果。有效铋制剂对治疗成功率的影响比较无显著差异。一般来说,与没有这种补充的治疗相比,含有益生菌的治疗方案更成功。在使用的四种益生菌菌株中,治愈率没有统计学差异,样本量允许进行统计分析。此外,在我们的研究中,补充益生菌罗伊氏乳杆菌ATCC PTA 6475或罗伊氏乳杆菌Protectis®DSM 17938显示出很高的治疗成功率(分别为85.2%和100.0%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信