Daiana-Ionela Cocoș, Eugenia Dumitrescu, Florin Muselin, Diana Brezovan, János Degi, Oana-Maria Boldura, Romeo T Cristina
{"title":"Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> in Wild Birds Across Europe: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Daiana-Ionela Cocoș, Eugenia Dumitrescu, Florin Muselin, Diana Brezovan, János Degi, Oana-Maria Boldura, Romeo T Cristina","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14090905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wild birds are increasingly recognized as reservoirs and vectors of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i>, but comprehensive assessments across Europe remain limited. AMR represents a growing threat to global health under the One Health framework. <b>Background/Objectives:</b> This review aimed to evaluate the occurrence, diversity, and resistance patterns of <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> in wild birds across Europe (1969-2025), and to identify ecological and methodological trends. <b>Methods:</b> Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed and Web of Science until July 2025. Inclusion criteria targeted studies reporting <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> isolation and/or AMR in free-living European birds. Data were synthesized thematically by bacterial species, avian order, resistance profile, and country. Risk of bias was assessed based on sampling, reporting, and diagnostic clarity. <b>Results:</b> Eighty studies met the inclusion criteria, covering over 18,000 wild birds from 25 countries. <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Salmonella enterica</i> were most reported, often exhibiting resistance to β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines. AMR was detected in birds from both urban and natural areas. Study designs varied widely, with inconsistent methods for bacterial identification and susceptibility testing. <b>Conclusions:</b> Wild birds in Europe carry resistant <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i>, including strains with clinically relevant resistance profiles. These findings support their inclusion in One Health AMR surveillance and highlight the need for harmonized protocols, expanded molecular tools, and ecological integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090905","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Wild birds are increasingly recognized as reservoirs and vectors of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) Enterobacteriaceae, but comprehensive assessments across Europe remain limited. AMR represents a growing threat to global health under the One Health framework. Background/Objectives: This review aimed to evaluate the occurrence, diversity, and resistance patterns of Enterobacteriaceae in wild birds across Europe (1969-2025), and to identify ecological and methodological trends. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed and Web of Science until July 2025. Inclusion criteria targeted studies reporting Enterobacteriaceae isolation and/or AMR in free-living European birds. Data were synthesized thematically by bacterial species, avian order, resistance profile, and country. Risk of bias was assessed based on sampling, reporting, and diagnostic clarity. Results: Eighty studies met the inclusion criteria, covering over 18,000 wild birds from 25 countries. Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica were most reported, often exhibiting resistance to β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines. AMR was detected in birds from both urban and natural areas. Study designs varied widely, with inconsistent methods for bacterial identification and susceptibility testing. Conclusions: Wild birds in Europe carry resistant Enterobacteriaceae, including strains with clinically relevant resistance profiles. These findings support their inclusion in One Health AMR surveillance and highlight the need for harmonized protocols, expanded molecular tools, and ecological integration.
野生鸟类越来越被认为是耐抗生素肠杆菌科(AMR)的宿主和媒介,但整个欧洲的综合评估仍然有限。在“同一个健康”框架下,抗微生物药物耐药性对全球健康构成了日益严重的威胁。背景/目的:本综述旨在评估1969-2025年欧洲野生鸟类肠杆菌科的发生、多样性和耐药模式,并确定生态学和方法学趋势。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA) 2020指南的首选报告项目,我们检索了PubMed和Web of Science,直到2025年7月。纳入标准针对报告在自由生活的欧洲鸟类中分离肠杆菌科和/或AMR的研究。数据按细菌种类、禽目、耐药概况和国家进行综合。根据抽样、报告和诊断清晰度评估偏倚风险。结果:80项研究符合纳入标准,涵盖25个国家的18,000多只野生鸟类。大肠杆菌和肠沙门氏菌报道最多,通常表现出对β-内酰胺类、氟喹诺酮类和四环素类药物的耐药性。在城市和自然地区的鸟类中均发现了抗菌素耐药性。研究设计差异很大,细菌鉴定和药敏试验方法不一致。结论:欧洲野生鸟类携带耐药肠杆菌科,包括具有临床相关耐药谱的菌株。这些发现支持将其纳入“一个健康”抗菌素耐药性监测,并强调需要统一方案、扩大分子工具和生态整合。
Antibiotics-BaselPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.