Increased Antimicrobial Consumption, Isolation Rate, and Resistance Profiles of Multi-Drug Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Healthcare Institution.
{"title":"Increased Antimicrobial Consumption, Isolation Rate, and Resistance Profiles of Multi-Drug Resistant <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa,</i> and <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Healthcare Institution.","authors":"Predrag Savic, Ljiljana Gojkovic Bukarica, Predrag Stevanovic, Teodora Vitorovic, Zoran Bukumiric, Olivera Vucicevic, Nenad Milanov, Vladimir Zivanovic, Ana Bukarica, Milos Gostimirovic","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14090871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aims of this paper are to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the non-rational use of antibiotics and potential alterations in the antibiotic resistance profiles of multi-drug resistant (MDR) isolates of <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (KPN), <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (PAE), and <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (ABA).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study was conducted at the tertiary University Hospital \"Dr Dragisa Misovic-Dedinje\" (Belgrade, Serbia) and was divided into three periods: pre-pandemic (1.4.2019-31.3.2020, period I), COVID-19 pandemic (1.4.2020-31.3.2021, period II), and COVID-19 pandemic-second phase (1.4.2021-31.3.2022, period III). Cultures were taken from each patient with clinically suspected infection (symptoms, biochemical markers of infection). All departments of the hospital were included in this study. Based on the source, all microbiological specimens were divided into 1° blood, 2° respiratory tract (tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, throat, sputum), 3° central-line catheter, 4° urine, 5° urinary catheter, 6° skin and soft tissue, and 6° other (peritoneal fluid, drainage sample, bioptate, bile, incisions, fistulas, and abscesses). After the isolation of bacterial strains from the samples, an antibiotic sensitivity test was performed for each individual isolate with the automated Vitek<sup>®</sup> 2 COMPACT. Antibiotic consumption testing was performed by the WHO guideline equations (ATC/DDD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2196 strains of KPN, PAE, and ABA from 41,144 hospitalized patients were isolated (23.6% of the number of total isolates). The number of ABA isolates statistically increased (<i>p</i> = 0.021), while the number of PAE isolates statistically decreased (<i>p</i> = 0.003) during the pandemic. An increase in the percentage of MDR strains was observed for KPN (<i>p</i> = 0.028) and PAE (<i>p</i> = 0.027). There has been an increase in the antibiotic resistance of KPN for piperacillin-tazobactam, the third and fourth generations of cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and cefepime), all carbapanems (imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem), and levofloxacin; of PAE for imipenem; and of ABA for amikacin. Total antibiotic consumption increased (from 755 DBD to 1300 DBD, +72%), especially in the watch and reserve group of antibiotics. The highest increases were noted for vancomycin, levofloxacin, azithromycin, and meropenem. MV positively correlated with the increased occurrence of MDR KPN (r = 0.35, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and MDR PAE (r = 0.43, <i>p</i> = 0.009) but not for MDR ABA (r = 0.09, <i>p</i> = 0.614). There has been a statistically significant increase in the <i>Candida</i> sp. isolates, but the prevalence of <i>Clostridium difficile</i> infection remained unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has influenced the increase in total and MDR strains of KPN, ABA, and PAE and worsened their antibiotic resistance profiles. An increase in the consumption of both total and specific antibiotics was observed, mostly of fluoroquinolones and carbapenems. A positive correlation between the number of patients on MV and an increase in MDR KPN and MDR PAE strains was noted. It is necessary to adopt and demand the implementation of appropriate antimicrobial stewardship interventions to decrease the resistance of intrahospital pathogens to antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090871","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The aims of this paper are to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the non-rational use of antibiotics and potential alterations in the antibiotic resistance profiles of multi-drug resistant (MDR) isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPN), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAE), and Acinetobacter baumannii (ABA).
Material and methods: This study was conducted at the tertiary University Hospital "Dr Dragisa Misovic-Dedinje" (Belgrade, Serbia) and was divided into three periods: pre-pandemic (1.4.2019-31.3.2020, period I), COVID-19 pandemic (1.4.2020-31.3.2021, period II), and COVID-19 pandemic-second phase (1.4.2021-31.3.2022, period III). Cultures were taken from each patient with clinically suspected infection (symptoms, biochemical markers of infection). All departments of the hospital were included in this study. Based on the source, all microbiological specimens were divided into 1° blood, 2° respiratory tract (tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, throat, sputum), 3° central-line catheter, 4° urine, 5° urinary catheter, 6° skin and soft tissue, and 6° other (peritoneal fluid, drainage sample, bioptate, bile, incisions, fistulas, and abscesses). After the isolation of bacterial strains from the samples, an antibiotic sensitivity test was performed for each individual isolate with the automated Vitek® 2 COMPACT. Antibiotic consumption testing was performed by the WHO guideline equations (ATC/DDD).
Results: A total of 2196 strains of KPN, PAE, and ABA from 41,144 hospitalized patients were isolated (23.6% of the number of total isolates). The number of ABA isolates statistically increased (p = 0.021), while the number of PAE isolates statistically decreased (p = 0.003) during the pandemic. An increase in the percentage of MDR strains was observed for KPN (p = 0.028) and PAE (p = 0.027). There has been an increase in the antibiotic resistance of KPN for piperacillin-tazobactam, the third and fourth generations of cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and cefepime), all carbapanems (imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem), and levofloxacin; of PAE for imipenem; and of ABA for amikacin. Total antibiotic consumption increased (from 755 DBD to 1300 DBD, +72%), especially in the watch and reserve group of antibiotics. The highest increases were noted for vancomycin, levofloxacin, azithromycin, and meropenem. MV positively correlated with the increased occurrence of MDR KPN (r = 0.35, p = 0.009) and MDR PAE (r = 0.43, p = 0.009) but not for MDR ABA (r = 0.09, p = 0.614). There has been a statistically significant increase in the Candida sp. isolates, but the prevalence of Clostridium difficile infection remained unchanged.
Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has influenced the increase in total and MDR strains of KPN, ABA, and PAE and worsened their antibiotic resistance profiles. An increase in the consumption of both total and specific antibiotics was observed, mostly of fluoroquinolones and carbapenems. A positive correlation between the number of patients on MV and an increase in MDR KPN and MDR PAE strains was noted. It is necessary to adopt and demand the implementation of appropriate antimicrobial stewardship interventions to decrease the resistance of intrahospital pathogens to antibiotics.
Antibiotics-BaselPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.