Validity of the Japanese Version of the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity (WCPA)-10 on Assessing Executive Function in Patients with Acquired Brain Injury (ABI).

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Asako Matsubara, Yasuhiro Higashi, Mio Kawabata, Katsunobu Sugihara
{"title":"Validity of the Japanese Version of the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity (WCPA)-10 on Assessing Executive Function in Patients with Acquired Brain Injury (ABI).","authors":"Asako Matsubara, Yasuhiro Higashi, Mio Kawabata, Katsunobu Sugihara","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15090993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The Weekly Calendar Planning Activity (WCPA) is one of the assessments of functional cognition, including executive function, by the cognitive instrumental activities of daily living (C-IADL). It is translated and adapted in many countries, but not in Japan. <b>Methods</b>: This study aimed to examine the validity of the Japanese version of the WCPA-10 (WCPA-10-J) in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI), and to explore the characteristics of cognitive strategy use among that population. Fifty-three patients with ABI aged 27-81 years and 52 healthy controls (HCs) completed the WCPA-10-J, three neuropsychological tests, and the assessment of the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). <b>Results</b>: Results demonstrated that the WCPA-10-J was able to discriminate between the patients with ABI and the HCs. We found significant limitations in ABI patients' ability to use strategies. Concurrent, convergent, and ecological validities were partly demonstrated through correlations between the neuropsychological test scores, IADL, and the WCPA-10-J performance. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study provides initial evidence for the validity of the WCPA-10-J for patients with ABI and suggests the need to use performance-based tests even in patients with normal cognitive screening test results. The WCPA-10-J could provide useful information for strategy-based interventions for patients with ABI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15090993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Weekly Calendar Planning Activity (WCPA) is one of the assessments of functional cognition, including executive function, by the cognitive instrumental activities of daily living (C-IADL). It is translated and adapted in many countries, but not in Japan. Methods: This study aimed to examine the validity of the Japanese version of the WCPA-10 (WCPA-10-J) in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI), and to explore the characteristics of cognitive strategy use among that population. Fifty-three patients with ABI aged 27-81 years and 52 healthy controls (HCs) completed the WCPA-10-J, three neuropsychological tests, and the assessment of the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Results: Results demonstrated that the WCPA-10-J was able to discriminate between the patients with ABI and the HCs. We found significant limitations in ABI patients' ability to use strategies. Concurrent, convergent, and ecological validities were partly demonstrated through correlations between the neuropsychological test scores, IADL, and the WCPA-10-J performance. Conclusions: This study provides initial evidence for the validity of the WCPA-10-J for patients with ABI and suggests the need to use performance-based tests even in patients with normal cognitive screening test results. The WCPA-10-J could provide useful information for strategy-based interventions for patients with ABI.

日文版计划周历活动(WCPA)-10评估获得性脑损伤(ABI)患者执行功能的效度。
背景:周日历计划活动(WCPA)是日常生活认知工具活动(C-IADL)对包括执行功能在内的功能认知的评估之一。它在许多国家被翻译和改编,但在日本没有。方法:本研究旨在检验日本版WCPA-10 (WCPA-10- j)在获得性脑损伤(ABI)患者中的有效性,并探讨该人群认知策略使用的特点。53例27-81岁ABI患者和52例健康对照(hc)完成了WCPA-10-J、3项神经心理测试和日常生活工具活动(IADL)评估。结果:结果表明WCPA-10-J能够区分ABI患者和hc患者。我们发现ABI患者使用策略的能力有明显的局限性。并发效度、收敛效度和生态效度通过神经心理测试分数、IADL和WCPA-10-J成绩之间的相关性得到部分证明。结论:本研究为WCPA-10-J对ABI患者的有效性提供了初步证据,并提示即使在认知筛查测试结果正常的患者中也需要使用基于性能的测试。WCPA-10-J可以为ABI患者的策略干预提供有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信