The First Shall Be First: Letter-Position Coding and Spatial Invariance in Two Cases of Attentional Dyslexia.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Jeremy J Tree, David R Playfoot
{"title":"The First Shall Be First: Letter-Position Coding and Spatial Invariance in Two Cases of Attentional Dyslexia.","authors":"Jeremy J Tree, David R Playfoot","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15090967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Previous research has demonstrated that the initial letters of a word likely play a <i>privileged role</i> in visual word recognition, such that reading and visual recognition errors reflecting changes in this position are much less likely. For example, prior case studies of attentional dyslexia reported that participants were most accurate at rejecting nonwords formed by transposing a word's <i>first two</i> letters (e.g., <i>WONER</i> from <i>OWNER</i>) compared to transpositions in later positions. The current study aimed to replicate and extend this finding in patients with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), a neurodegenerative condition associated with visuospatial and attentional impairments. <b>Methods:</b> Two PCA patients completed lexical decision tasks involving five-letter real words and nonwords created either by transposing adjacent letters (in positions 1 + 2, 2 + 3, 3 + 4, or 4 + 5) or using matched nonword controls. To assess robustness, tasks were repeated across test-retest sessions. Stimuli were presented in both canonical horizontal and non-canonical vertical (marquee) formats. Accuracy, response bias, and sensitivity (d') were estimated, with 95% confidence intervals derived from a nonparametric bootstrap procedure. Within-case logistic regressions were also conducted to illustrate the findings. <b>Results:</b> Both patients showed significantly higher accuracy and lower response bias for 1 + 2 transposition nonwords relative to other positions. This early-letter advantage persisted across test-retest observations and was maintained when words were presented in the vertical format, suggesting <i>orientation-invariant</i> effects. The bootstrap and regression analyses provided convergent support for these results. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings provide novel evidence in PCA that the encoding of early letter positions operates independently of visual orientation and persists despite attentional deficits. This supports models in which the initial letters serve as a key <i>anchor point</i> in orthographic processing, highlighting the privileged and resilient status of early letter encoding in visual word recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15090967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Previous research has demonstrated that the initial letters of a word likely play a privileged role in visual word recognition, such that reading and visual recognition errors reflecting changes in this position are much less likely. For example, prior case studies of attentional dyslexia reported that participants were most accurate at rejecting nonwords formed by transposing a word's first two letters (e.g., WONER from OWNER) compared to transpositions in later positions. The current study aimed to replicate and extend this finding in patients with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), a neurodegenerative condition associated with visuospatial and attentional impairments. Methods: Two PCA patients completed lexical decision tasks involving five-letter real words and nonwords created either by transposing adjacent letters (in positions 1 + 2, 2 + 3, 3 + 4, or 4 + 5) or using matched nonword controls. To assess robustness, tasks were repeated across test-retest sessions. Stimuli were presented in both canonical horizontal and non-canonical vertical (marquee) formats. Accuracy, response bias, and sensitivity (d') were estimated, with 95% confidence intervals derived from a nonparametric bootstrap procedure. Within-case logistic regressions were also conducted to illustrate the findings. Results: Both patients showed significantly higher accuracy and lower response bias for 1 + 2 transposition nonwords relative to other positions. This early-letter advantage persisted across test-retest observations and was maintained when words were presented in the vertical format, suggesting orientation-invariant effects. The bootstrap and regression analyses provided convergent support for these results. Conclusions: The findings provide novel evidence in PCA that the encoding of early letter positions operates independently of visual orientation and persists despite attentional deficits. This supports models in which the initial letters serve as a key anchor point in orthographic processing, highlighting the privileged and resilient status of early letter encoding in visual word recognition.

先者优先:两例注意阅读障碍的字母位置编码和空间不变性。
背景/目的:先前的研究表明,单词的首字母可能在视觉单词识别中起着特殊的作用,因此反映该位置变化的阅读和视觉识别错误的可能性要小得多。例如,先前关于注意力阅读障碍的案例研究报告称,参与者在拒绝由单词的前两个字母调换构成的非单词(例如,WONER来自OWNER)方面比在后面的位置调换更准确。目前的研究旨在复制和扩展后皮质萎缩(PCA)患者的这一发现,PCA是一种与视觉空间和注意力障碍相关的神经退行性疾病。方法:两名PCA患者完成了词汇决策任务,包括五个字母的真实单词和通过调换相邻字母(位置1 + 2、2 + 3、3 + 4或4 + 5)或使用匹配的非单词对照创建的非单词。为了评估稳健性,在测试-重测试期间重复了任务。刺激以标准水平和非标准垂直(字幕)格式呈现。准确度、反应偏差和灵敏度(d')进行了估计,95%的置信区间来自非参数自举过程。还进行了病例内逻辑回归来说明研究结果。结果:两组患者对1 + 2换位非词的准确度均显著高于其他位置,反应偏倚显著低于其他位置。这种早字母的优势在反复测试中持续存在,当单词以垂直格式呈现时也保持不变,这表明方向不变效应。自举和回归分析为这些结果提供了收敛性支持。结论:研究结果为PCA提供了新的证据,证明早期字母位置的编码与视觉方向无关,并且在注意缺陷的情况下仍然存在。这支持了首字母作为正字法处理关键锚点的模型,突出了早期字母编码在视觉单词识别中的特权和弹性地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信