Non-Invasive Cervical Spinal Stimulation and Respiratory Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Partial Crossover Design.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Hatice Kumru, Agustin Hernandez-Navarro, Sergiu Albu, Loreto García-Alén
{"title":"Non-Invasive Cervical Spinal Stimulation and Respiratory Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Partial Crossover Design.","authors":"Hatice Kumru, Agustin Hernandez-Navarro, Sergiu Albu, Loreto García-Alén","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15090982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Respiratory impairment is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in participants with spinal cord injury (SCI). Cervical SCI (cSCI) severely compromises respiratory function due to paralysis and weakness of the respiratory muscles. Recent evidence suggests that transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) may enhance motor strength and promote functional recovery. Therefore, cervical tSCS, applied at cervical segments, holds potential as a therapeutic strategy to improve respiratory function in participants with cervical SCI. <b>Methods</b>: This randomized controlled trial with a partial crossover design included participants with both complete and incomplete cSCI. Neurological assessments were used, as well as tests to evaluate pulmonary function maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), and spirometric measurements. These assessments were conducted at baseline and after the last session. The experimental group received tSCS at the C3-C4 and C6-C7 cervical spinal levels, delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz during occupational therapy. The control group underwent identical occupational therapy sessions without stimulation. Each session lasted 30 min and was conducted over eight days. <b>Results</b>: Fifteen participants with cSCI received tSCS, while 11 cSCI participants were included in the control group. Seven participants took part in both groups. Only the tSCS group showed significant improvements in MIP, MEP, and forced vital capacity (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while no significant changes were observed in the control group. <b>Conclusions</b>: tSCS applied at the cervical segments can promote respiratory function following cervical SCI. This approach may support neuroplasticity and help reduce long-term respiratory complications in participants with cervical SCI. However, to confirm these effects, long-term stimulation protocols and follow-up studies in larger SCI populations are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15090982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Respiratory impairment is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in participants with spinal cord injury (SCI). Cervical SCI (cSCI) severely compromises respiratory function due to paralysis and weakness of the respiratory muscles. Recent evidence suggests that transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) may enhance motor strength and promote functional recovery. Therefore, cervical tSCS, applied at cervical segments, holds potential as a therapeutic strategy to improve respiratory function in participants with cervical SCI. Methods: This randomized controlled trial with a partial crossover design included participants with both complete and incomplete cSCI. Neurological assessments were used, as well as tests to evaluate pulmonary function maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), and spirometric measurements. These assessments were conducted at baseline and after the last session. The experimental group received tSCS at the C3-C4 and C6-C7 cervical spinal levels, delivered at a frequency of 30 Hz during occupational therapy. The control group underwent identical occupational therapy sessions without stimulation. Each session lasted 30 min and was conducted over eight days. Results: Fifteen participants with cSCI received tSCS, while 11 cSCI participants were included in the control group. Seven participants took part in both groups. Only the tSCS group showed significant improvements in MIP, MEP, and forced vital capacity (p < 0.05), while no significant changes were observed in the control group. Conclusions: tSCS applied at the cervical segments can promote respiratory function following cervical SCI. This approach may support neuroplasticity and help reduce long-term respiratory complications in participants with cervical SCI. However, to confirm these effects, long-term stimulation protocols and follow-up studies in larger SCI populations are required.

脊髓损伤后无创颈椎刺激和呼吸恢复:一项部分交叉设计的随机对照试验。
背景/目的:呼吸功能障碍是脊髓损伤(SCI)患者发病和死亡的主要原因。颈椎脊髓损伤(cSCI)严重损害呼吸功能,由于麻痹和无力的呼吸肌。最近的证据表明,经皮脊髓电刺激(tSCS)可以增强运动强度,促进功能恢复。因此,颈椎tSCS应用于颈椎节段,有可能作为一种治疗策略来改善颈椎脊髓损伤患者的呼吸功能。方法:该随机对照试验采用部分交叉设计,包括完全性和不完全性cSCI患者。使用神经学评估,以及评估肺功能、最大吸气压(MIP)、最大呼气压(MEP)和肺活量测量的测试。这些评估是在基线和上届会议之后进行的。实验组接受C3-C4和C6-C7颈椎水平的tSCS,在职业治疗期间以30 Hz的频率给予。对照组在没有刺激的情况下接受相同的职业治疗。每个疗程持续30分钟,持续8天。结果:15例cSCI患者接受tSCS治疗,对照组11例cSCI患者接受tSCS治疗。两组各有7名参与者。只有tSCS组在MIP、MEP和用力肺活量方面有显著改善(p < 0.05),对照组无显著变化。结论:tSCS应用于颈段可促进脊髓损伤后的呼吸功能。这种方法可能支持神经可塑性,并有助于减少颈椎脊髓损伤患者的长期呼吸并发症。然而,为了证实这些影响,需要在更大的脊髓损伤人群中进行长期刺激方案和后续研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信