Comparative effectiveness of zeolite and rice husk biochar in mitigating NH₃ and N₂O emissions as linked to the nitrogen use efficiency of pig slurry during the vegetative growth of Brassica napus

IF 5.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Bok-Rye Lee, Sang-Hyun Park, Muchamad Muchlas, Tae-Hwan Kim
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of zeolite and rice husk biochar in mitigating NH₃ and N₂O emissions as linked to the nitrogen use efficiency of pig slurry during the vegetative growth of Brassica napus","authors":"Bok-Rye Lee,&nbsp;Sang-Hyun Park,&nbsp;Muchamad Muchlas,&nbsp;Tae-Hwan Kim","doi":"10.1186/s40538-025-00859-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ammonia (NH<sub>3 </sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emitted from the pig slurry (PS)-applied soil lead not only to the risk of environmental pollution, but also to the loss of plant nutritional nitrogen (N). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of zeolite and rice husk biochar (RHB) in mitigating the N losses via NH₃ and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from PS-amended soils, and N use efficiency (NUE) for vegetative growth of oilseed rape (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.). Both zeolite and RHB application significantly reduced NH<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from the PS-applied soil and improved the NUE for the vegetative growth. When compared the effectiveness of two materials, RHB application has more positive effectiveness in soil pH buffering, urease activity, organic acid content and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> content in soil throughout the experimental period, resulting in a higher mitigation of NH<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions as well as NUE for dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) production. The enhanced NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> content in soil closely related to the reduction of NH<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, and with improved NUE for DM and CP production. A superior performance of RHB relative to zeolite is attributed mainly to a stronger capacity of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> adsorption by higher oxygen-containing functional groups on its surface, and in part to the supply of bioavailable carbon derived from RHB leading to an increase in urease activity and soil organic acid content. Therefore, RHB can be considered a more promising amendment than zeolite for simultaneously mitigating gaseous N losses and enhancing NUE in oilseed rape cultivation.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":512,"journal":{"name":"Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://chembioagro.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s40538-025-00859-y","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40538-025-00859-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ammonia (NH) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emitted from the pig slurry (PS)-applied soil lead not only to the risk of environmental pollution, but also to the loss of plant nutritional nitrogen (N). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of zeolite and rice husk biochar (RHB) in mitigating the N losses via NH₃ and N2O emissions from PS-amended soils, and N use efficiency (NUE) for vegetative growth of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Both zeolite and RHB application significantly reduced NH3 and N2O emissions from the PS-applied soil and improved the NUE for the vegetative growth. When compared the effectiveness of two materials, RHB application has more positive effectiveness in soil pH buffering, urease activity, organic acid content and NH4+ content in soil throughout the experimental period, resulting in a higher mitigation of NH3 and N2O emissions as well as NUE for dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) production. The enhanced NH4+ content in soil closely related to the reduction of NH3 and N2O emissions, and with improved NUE for DM and CP production. A superior performance of RHB relative to zeolite is attributed mainly to a stronger capacity of NH4+ adsorption by higher oxygen-containing functional groups on its surface, and in part to the supply of bioavailable carbon derived from RHB leading to an increase in urease activity and soil organic acid content. Therefore, RHB can be considered a more promising amendment than zeolite for simultaneously mitigating gaseous N losses and enhancing NUE in oilseed rape cultivation.

Graphical abstract

沸石和稻壳生物炭在甘蓝型油菜营养生长过程中减少NH₃和N₂O排放的比较效果与猪浆氮利用效率有关
施用猪浆(PS)的土壤排放的氨(NH3)和氧化亚氮(N2O)不仅会造成环境污染的风险,还会造成植物营养氮(N)的损失。本研究旨在比较沸石和稻壳生物炭(RHB)减轻ps改良土壤中NH₃和N2O排放造成的N损失的效果,以及油菜营养生长的N利用效率(NUE)。施用沸石和RHB均显著降低了施用ps土壤的NH3和N2O排放,提高了植物生长的氮肥利用效率。结果表明,在整个试验期内,施用RHB在土壤pH缓冲、脲酶活性、有机酸含量和NH4+含量方面具有更显著的正向效应,从而降低了NH3和N2O排放,提高了干物质(DM)和粗蛋白质(CP)生产的NUE。土壤中NH4+含量的增加与NH3和N2O排放的减少密切相关,并与DM和CP生产的NUE的提高密切相关。RHB优于沸石的主要原因是其表面含氧官能团较多,对NH4+的吸附能力较强,部分原因是RHB提供的生物可利用碳增加了脲酶活性和土壤有机酸含量。因此,RHB可以被认为是一种比沸石更有希望同时减轻油菜栽培中气态氮损失和提高氮肥利用效率的改良剂。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture is an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed forum for the advancement and application to all fields of agriculture of modern chemical, biochemical and molecular technologies. The scope of this journal includes chemical and biochemical processes aimed to increase sustainable agricultural and food production, the evaluation of quality and origin of raw primary products and their transformation into foods and chemicals, as well as environmental monitoring and remediation. Of special interest are the effects of chemical and biochemical technologies, also at the nano and supramolecular scale, on the relationships between soil, plants, microorganisms and their environment, with the help of modern bioinformatics. Another special focus is the use of modern bioorganic and biological chemistry to develop new technologies for plant nutrition and bio-stimulation, advancement of biorefineries from biomasses, safe and traceable food products, carbon storage in soil and plants and restoration of contaminated soils to agriculture. This journal presents the first opportunity to bring together researchers from a wide number of disciplines within the agricultural chemical and biological sciences, from both industry and academia. The principle aim of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture is to allow the exchange of the most advanced chemical and biochemical knowledge to develop technologies which address one of the most pressing challenges of our times - sustaining a growing world population. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture publishes original research articles, short letters and invited reviews. Articles from scientists in industry, academia as well as private research institutes, non-governmental and environmental organizations are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信