A recent advances on autism spectrum disorders in diagnosing based on machine learning and deep learning

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Hajir Ammar Hatim, Zaid Abdi Alkareem Alyasseri, Norziana Jamil
{"title":"A recent advances on autism spectrum disorders in diagnosing based on machine learning and deep learning","authors":"Hajir Ammar Hatim,&nbsp;Zaid Abdi Alkareem Alyasseri,&nbsp;Norziana Jamil","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11302-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Neurological disorders affect communication ability, social interaction, and a person’s conduct. Early diagnosis and treatment of ASD during the early stages of a person’s life may result in better outcomes and a higher quality of life for patients. Current methods of diagnosis are based on behavioral observations and interviews, which are subjective, time-consuming, and costly. EEG does not include invasive techniques, and it is a safe and painless way of measuring electrical activity in the brain. EEG signals may reflect neural differences and abnormalities related to ASD and serve as a potential biomarker for diagnosis. Due to the increase in prevalence, there has been an increased need to develop more sensitive and unbiased diagnostic methods for ASD. ML and DL are two sophisticated methods that researchers developed for detecting ASD by doing neural network analyses. The review paper incorporates the analysis of previous studies; more than 200 works have been analyzed from top publishers like Elsevier, IEEE, MDPI, and Springer, specifically related to EEG signal analysis and feature extraction techniques. It considers significant methods for ASD detection, including SVMs, CNN, and other models like KNN, ResNet50, and ANFIS. Other datasets central in these studies are KAU, BCIAUT-P300, and ADOS-2. The performance metrics adopted in this research include accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. For example, the cubic SVM realized an accuracy of 95.8%, while the CNN models reached 95%. Other models, like ResNet50, achieved 99.39%, while ANFIS reached 98.9%. Sensitivity and specificity also showed varying scores across the methods, between 85 and 100%, indicating the high potential of these approaches in ASD diagnosis. Future studies could pay more attention to dataset representativeness improvements and do the clinical validation of these models for better generalization and relevance toward early diagnosis in ASD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11302-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11302-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neurological disorders affect communication ability, social interaction, and a person’s conduct. Early diagnosis and treatment of ASD during the early stages of a person’s life may result in better outcomes and a higher quality of life for patients. Current methods of diagnosis are based on behavioral observations and interviews, which are subjective, time-consuming, and costly. EEG does not include invasive techniques, and it is a safe and painless way of measuring electrical activity in the brain. EEG signals may reflect neural differences and abnormalities related to ASD and serve as a potential biomarker for diagnosis. Due to the increase in prevalence, there has been an increased need to develop more sensitive and unbiased diagnostic methods for ASD. ML and DL are two sophisticated methods that researchers developed for detecting ASD by doing neural network analyses. The review paper incorporates the analysis of previous studies; more than 200 works have been analyzed from top publishers like Elsevier, IEEE, MDPI, and Springer, specifically related to EEG signal analysis and feature extraction techniques. It considers significant methods for ASD detection, including SVMs, CNN, and other models like KNN, ResNet50, and ANFIS. Other datasets central in these studies are KAU, BCIAUT-P300, and ADOS-2. The performance metrics adopted in this research include accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. For example, the cubic SVM realized an accuracy of 95.8%, while the CNN models reached 95%. Other models, like ResNet50, achieved 99.39%, while ANFIS reached 98.9%. Sensitivity and specificity also showed varying scores across the methods, between 85 and 100%, indicating the high potential of these approaches in ASD diagnosis. Future studies could pay more attention to dataset representativeness improvements and do the clinical validation of these models for better generalization and relevance toward early diagnosis in ASD.

基于机器学习和深度学习的自闭症谱系障碍诊断的最新进展
神经系统疾病影响沟通能力、社会互动和一个人的行为。在一个人生命的早期阶段对ASD进行早期诊断和治疗可能会带来更好的结果和更高的生活质量。目前的诊断方法是基于行为观察和访谈,这是主观的,耗时且昂贵的。脑电图不包括侵入性技术,它是一种安全无痛的测量大脑电活动的方法。脑电图信号可能反映与ASD相关的神经差异和异常,并可作为潜在的诊断生物标志物。由于患病率的增加,越来越需要开发更敏感和公正的ASD诊断方法。ML和DL是研究人员通过神经网络分析开发的两种检测ASD的复杂方法。这篇综述文章纳入了对以往研究的分析;已经分析了来自Elsevier, IEEE, MDPI和施普林格等顶级出版商的200多部作品,特别是与EEG信号分析和特征提取技术相关的作品。它考虑了ASD检测的重要方法,包括svm、CNN和其他模型,如KNN、ResNet50和ANFIS。这些研究的其他中心数据集是KAU, BCIAUT-P300和ADOS-2。本研究采用的性能指标包括准确性、敏感性和特异性。例如,三次支持向量机实现了95.8%的准确率,而CNN模型达到了95%。其他模型,如ResNet50,达到99.39%,而ANFIS达到98.9%。灵敏度和特异性在不同的方法中也显示出不同的分数,在85到100%之间,表明这些方法在ASD诊断中的潜力很大。未来的研究可以更多地关注数据集代表性的提高,并对这些模型进行临床验证,以更好地推广和早期诊断ASD的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信