A comprehensive review of AI methods in upper extremity/limb bone fracture detection

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Zahra Moradi Pour, Stefano Berretti
{"title":"A comprehensive review of AI methods in upper extremity/limb bone fracture detection","authors":"Zahra Moradi Pour,&nbsp;Stefano Berretti","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11296-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurate detection of bone fractures is crucial for patient care, however, the traditional manual review of medical images like X-rays, Computed Tomography (CT) scans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRIs), and ultrasounds is time-consuming and labor-intensive. The shortage of clinicians, limited access to expert radiologists, and heavy workloads increase the risk of errors, which can slow down patients recovery. Artificial Intelligence (AI) models like Faster R-CNN have shown significant diagnostic accuracy (ACC) and sensitivity (SEN), often outperforming on-call radiologists in detecting complex fracture types. For example, Faster R-CNN has achieved SEN exceeding 90% in distal radius fracture detection. However, despite these advancements, AI-driven fracture detection systems still face several challenges, including the need for extensive annotated datasets, variability in imaging quality across clinical settings, potential biases in model training, and concerns regarding the interpretability and reliability of AI-generated predictions. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of recent advancements and limitations in AI-based fracture detection, offering quantitative insights into model performance. By examining these aspects, the study highlights the importance of integrating AI systems into clinical workflows, while addressing existing barriers to their widespread adoption. This analysis underscores AI’s potential to enhance diagnostic efficiency, reduce human error, and improve patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11296-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11296-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate detection of bone fractures is crucial for patient care, however, the traditional manual review of medical images like X-rays, Computed Tomography (CT) scans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRIs), and ultrasounds is time-consuming and labor-intensive. The shortage of clinicians, limited access to expert radiologists, and heavy workloads increase the risk of errors, which can slow down patients recovery. Artificial Intelligence (AI) models like Faster R-CNN have shown significant diagnostic accuracy (ACC) and sensitivity (SEN), often outperforming on-call radiologists in detecting complex fracture types. For example, Faster R-CNN has achieved SEN exceeding 90% in distal radius fracture detection. However, despite these advancements, AI-driven fracture detection systems still face several challenges, including the need for extensive annotated datasets, variability in imaging quality across clinical settings, potential biases in model training, and concerns regarding the interpretability and reliability of AI-generated predictions. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of recent advancements and limitations in AI-based fracture detection, offering quantitative insights into model performance. By examining these aspects, the study highlights the importance of integrating AI systems into clinical workflows, while addressing existing barriers to their widespread adoption. This analysis underscores AI’s potential to enhance diagnostic efficiency, reduce human error, and improve patient outcomes.

人工智能在上肢/肢体骨折检测中的应用综述
骨折的准确检测对患者护理至关重要,然而,传统的人工检查医学图像,如x射线、计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(mri)和超声波,既耗时又费力。临床医生的短缺、接触放射科专家的机会有限以及繁重的工作量增加了出错的风险,这可能会减慢患者的康复速度。像Faster R-CNN这样的人工智能(AI)模型已经显示出显著的诊断准确性(ACC)和灵敏度(SEN),在检测复杂骨折类型方面通常优于随叫随到的放射科医生。例如,Faster R-CNN在桡骨远端骨折检测中SEN超过90%。然而,尽管取得了这些进步,人工智能驱动的骨折检测系统仍然面临着一些挑战,包括需要大量带注释的数据集,临床环境中成像质量的可变性,模型训练中的潜在偏差,以及对人工智能生成预测的可解释性和可靠性的担忧。本文全面分析了基于人工智能的裂缝检测的最新进展和局限性,为模型性能提供了定量的见解。通过检查这些方面,该研究强调了将人工智能系统集成到临床工作流程中的重要性,同时解决了其广泛采用的现有障碍。这一分析强调了人工智能在提高诊断效率、减少人为错误和改善患者预后方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信