An efficient variance-based approach in RMDO framework of a space capsule under material and manufacturing uncertainties

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Hassan Naseh, Hadiseh Karimaei, Mohammad Lesani Fadafan
{"title":"An efficient variance-based approach in RMDO framework of a space capsule under material and manufacturing uncertainties","authors":"Hassan Naseh,&nbsp;Hadiseh Karimaei,&nbsp;Mohammad Lesani Fadafan","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2025.111751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents an efficient variance-based Robust Multi-disciplinary Design Optimization (RMDO) framework aimed at minimizing the total mass of a re-entry space capsule under uncertainties, including manufacturing and assembly dimensional tolerances, as well as structural material properties (density, Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio). The method integrates an All-At-Once (AAO) approach within the MDO framework, utilizing a genetic algorithm optimizer. After finding an optimal design point, its robustness is evaluated. If the design is not robust, design constraints are adjusted to move away from the optimal boundary, and the MDO process is repeated until robustness criteria are satisfied. The robustness assessment begins by analyzing the correlation between objective functions and constraints through Design Of Experiment (DOE) using Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) to model input uncertainties. Surrogate Method (Kriging) is used to generate the objective function and constraints. The final step in the RMDO framework evaluates how input uncertainties affect the optimal design and constraints. Results show the RMDO-optimized capsule is 10.7 % lighter than the native version while maintaining safety and stability. Consequently, according to the variance-based RMDO evaluation, the critical constraint functions have at least a 2-sigma uncertainty-based margin of safety in the problem, which confirms the design's robustness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"266 ","pages":"Article 111751"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025009512","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents an efficient variance-based Robust Multi-disciplinary Design Optimization (RMDO) framework aimed at minimizing the total mass of a re-entry space capsule under uncertainties, including manufacturing and assembly dimensional tolerances, as well as structural material properties (density, Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio). The method integrates an All-At-Once (AAO) approach within the MDO framework, utilizing a genetic algorithm optimizer. After finding an optimal design point, its robustness is evaluated. If the design is not robust, design constraints are adjusted to move away from the optimal boundary, and the MDO process is repeated until robustness criteria are satisfied. The robustness assessment begins by analyzing the correlation between objective functions and constraints through Design Of Experiment (DOE) using Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) to model input uncertainties. Surrogate Method (Kriging) is used to generate the objective function and constraints. The final step in the RMDO framework evaluates how input uncertainties affect the optimal design and constraints. Results show the RMDO-optimized capsule is 10.7 % lighter than the native version while maintaining safety and stability. Consequently, according to the variance-based RMDO evaluation, the critical constraint functions have at least a 2-sigma uncertainty-based margin of safety in the problem, which confirms the design's robustness.
材料和制造不确定条件下航天器RMDO框架的有效方差分析方法
本文提出了一种有效的基于方差的鲁棒多学科设计优化(RMDO)框架,旨在最大限度地减少再入太空舱在不确定性下的总质量,包括制造和装配尺寸公差,以及结构材料性能(密度、杨氏模量、泊松比)。该方法利用遗传算法优化器,在MDO框架内集成了All-At-Once (AAO)方法。找到最优设计点后,对其鲁棒性进行评价。如果设计不稳健,则调整设计约束以远离最优边界,重复MDO过程,直到满足鲁棒性标准。鲁棒性评估首先通过实验设计(DOE)分析目标函数与约束之间的相关性,使用拉丁超立方体采样(LHS)对输入不确定性进行建模。采用代理方法(Kriging)生成目标函数和约束条件。RMDO框架的最后一步评估输入不确定性如何影响最优设计和约束。结果表明,在保持安全性和稳定性的前提下,优化后的胶囊比原胶囊轻10.7%。因此,根据基于方差的RMDO评价,关键约束函数在问题中至少具有2西格玛基于不确定性的安全裕度,这证实了设计的鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信