From promises to action: Analyzing global commitments to tackle hunger and food insecurity

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Christina Zorbas , Danielle Resnick , Eleanor Jones , Shoba Suri , Elyse Iruhiriye , Derek Headey , Will Martin , Rob Vos , Purnima Menon
{"title":"From promises to action: Analyzing global commitments to tackle hunger and food insecurity","authors":"Christina Zorbas ,&nbsp;Danielle Resnick ,&nbsp;Eleanor Jones ,&nbsp;Shoba Suri ,&nbsp;Elyse Iruhiriye ,&nbsp;Derek Headey ,&nbsp;Will Martin ,&nbsp;Rob Vos ,&nbsp;Purnima Menon","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-level declarations and commitment statements are a common output of global, intergovernmental meetings and critical to their continued public legitimacy. Yet, to what extent have such statements served as roadmaps for concrete action? To address this question, this paper focuses on commitments to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2, which aims to end hunger, achieve food security, and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030. Using a structured framework with seven domains, we analyzed 148 intergovernmental commitment documents emerging from 78 global meetings focused on SDG2 and organized by ten different global bodies between 2015 and 2023.</div><div>We find that stated visions to address SDG2 increasingly have been emphasized at global meetings over time but that specific actions to accelerate progress towards SDG2 were weaker. For instance, we find few examples of how needed actions will be scaled up over time, how financing might be mobilized, and how to strengthen horizontal (i.e. multi-sectoral) and vertical (i.e. multi-level) policy coherence. Progress reports are often identified as the main tool for providing public accountability, but there rarely are any consequences to governments for failure to uphold their commitments. We offer several policy recommendations emanating from the analysis, including the need to institutionalize monitoring of SDG2 commitments—not just targets—in the next five years, and a better understanding of political economy factors that may inhibit global decisions from translating into national policy decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 102968"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225001733","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-level declarations and commitment statements are a common output of global, intergovernmental meetings and critical to their continued public legitimacy. Yet, to what extent have such statements served as roadmaps for concrete action? To address this question, this paper focuses on commitments to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2, which aims to end hunger, achieve food security, and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030. Using a structured framework with seven domains, we analyzed 148 intergovernmental commitment documents emerging from 78 global meetings focused on SDG2 and organized by ten different global bodies between 2015 and 2023.
We find that stated visions to address SDG2 increasingly have been emphasized at global meetings over time but that specific actions to accelerate progress towards SDG2 were weaker. For instance, we find few examples of how needed actions will be scaled up over time, how financing might be mobilized, and how to strengthen horizontal (i.e. multi-sectoral) and vertical (i.e. multi-level) policy coherence. Progress reports are often identified as the main tool for providing public accountability, but there rarely are any consequences to governments for failure to uphold their commitments. We offer several policy recommendations emanating from the analysis, including the need to institutionalize monitoring of SDG2 commitments—not just targets—in the next five years, and a better understanding of political economy factors that may inhibit global decisions from translating into national policy decisions.
从承诺到行动:分析解决饥饿和粮食不安全问题的全球承诺
高级别宣言和承诺声明是全球政府间会议的共同成果,对其持续的公共合法性至关重要。然而,这些声明在多大程度上起到了具体行动路线图的作用?为解决这一问题,本文重点介绍了对可持续发展目标(SDG) 2的承诺,该目标旨在到2030年消除饥饿、实现粮食安全并促进可持续农业。我们使用包含7个领域的结构化框架,分析了2015年至2023年间由10个不同的全球机构组织的78次以可持续发展目标2为重点的全球会议上产生的148份政府间承诺文件。我们发现,随着时间的推移,全球会议越来越多地强调解决可持续发展目标2的既定愿景,但加速实现可持续发展目标2的具体行动却比较薄弱。例如,我们发现很少有例子说明如何随着时间的推移扩大所需的行动,如何调动资金,以及如何加强横向(即多部门)和纵向(即多层次)的政策一致性。进度报告通常被认为是提供公共问责制的主要工具,但很少有政府因未能履行其承诺而承担任何后果。我们从分析中提出了几项政策建议,包括需要在未来五年内将可持续发展目标2承诺的监测制度化,而不仅仅是目标,以及更好地理解可能阻碍全球决策转化为国家政策决策的政治经济因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信