Miranda Smith , Maryam Aghayan , Jonathan Little , Jerilynn C. Prior , Tamara R. Cohen , Zoë Soon , Hephzibah Bomide , Sarah Purcell
{"title":"Energy intake and appetite in laboratory and free-living conditions may be consistent across menstrual cycle phases","authors":"Miranda Smith , Maryam Aghayan , Jonathan Little , Jerilynn C. Prior , Tamara R. Cohen , Zoë Soon , Hephzibah Bomide , Sarah Purcell","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Self-reported dietary intake varies across menstrual cycle phases, but objective assessments of dietary intake together with appetite and resting metabolic rate (RMR) are limited. This study aimed to assess differences in dietary intake, appetite, and RMR during two hormonally-distinct menstrual cycle phases in laboratory and free-living settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Healthy premenopausal females with predictable normal-length menstrual cycles completed two study visits: one in the late-follicular and one in the mid-luteal phase. Menstrual cycle phases were assessed using urinary luteinizing hormone surge and prospective cycle days. Participants consumed a 2-day energy- and macronutrient-balanced run-in diet prior to each visit. RMR was measured with indirect calorimetry, followed by appetite ratings before and after a standardized breakfast, and a food cravings questionnaire. Appetite was also tracked for 2.5 days post-visit in a free-living environment. <em>Ad libitum</em> energy and macronutrient intakes were measured using pre-weighed plus weighing of uneaten food at an in-laboratory lunch meal, as well as during the 2.5-day free-living period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen participants were included (age: 21 ± 4 years; body mass index: 21.2 ± 1.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). There were no differences between in-laboratory <em>ad libitum</em> energy or macronutrient intakes, appetite, or food cravings between phases. RMR did not differ between phases, although the mid-luteal phase RMR tended to be higher (104 ± 218 kcal/day higher<em>; P</em> = 0.074). No main or interaction effects for phase or time were observed for free-living dietary intake nor appetite ratings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although RMR tended to be increased during the luteal phase, comprehensive appetite and energy intake assessments showed no significant cycle-phase differences in these 18 participants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 108314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325004672","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Self-reported dietary intake varies across menstrual cycle phases, but objective assessments of dietary intake together with appetite and resting metabolic rate (RMR) are limited. This study aimed to assess differences in dietary intake, appetite, and RMR during two hormonally-distinct menstrual cycle phases in laboratory and free-living settings.
Methods
Healthy premenopausal females with predictable normal-length menstrual cycles completed two study visits: one in the late-follicular and one in the mid-luteal phase. Menstrual cycle phases were assessed using urinary luteinizing hormone surge and prospective cycle days. Participants consumed a 2-day energy- and macronutrient-balanced run-in diet prior to each visit. RMR was measured with indirect calorimetry, followed by appetite ratings before and after a standardized breakfast, and a food cravings questionnaire. Appetite was also tracked for 2.5 days post-visit in a free-living environment. Ad libitum energy and macronutrient intakes were measured using pre-weighed plus weighing of uneaten food at an in-laboratory lunch meal, as well as during the 2.5-day free-living period.
Results
Eighteen participants were included (age: 21 ± 4 years; body mass index: 21.2 ± 1.5 kg/m2). There were no differences between in-laboratory ad libitum energy or macronutrient intakes, appetite, or food cravings between phases. RMR did not differ between phases, although the mid-luteal phase RMR tended to be higher (104 ± 218 kcal/day higher; P = 0.074). No main or interaction effects for phase or time were observed for free-living dietary intake nor appetite ratings.
Conclusions
Although RMR tended to be increased during the luteal phase, comprehensive appetite and energy intake assessments showed no significant cycle-phase differences in these 18 participants.
期刊介绍:
Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.