“DO THEY DO OUR THOZHIL?”: Toxic Industrialization, Uncertainty, and Refusal in North Chennai

IF 1.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
RISHABH RAGHAVAN
{"title":"“DO THEY DO OUR THOZHIL?”: Toxic Industrialization, Uncertainty, and Refusal in North Chennai","authors":"RISHABH RAGHAVAN","doi":"10.14506/ca40.3.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article shows how acts of refusal mediated different experiences of uncertainty among the artisanal fishermen who lived and worked in Ennore's (Chennai, India) polluted landscape. In uncovering how some of these uncertainties were experienced as a result of histories of urban segregation that rendered peripheral locations like Ennore seemingly appropriate to house polluting industries, and thereafter sustained through the bodily demands of <i>thozhil</i> (the profession of artisanal fishing) in a contaminated river, the article posits acts of partial, processual, and contradictory forms of refusal as ways in which different fishermen reconciled some of their experiences of living with Ennore's petrochemical pollution. In critically engaging emic terms like area and <i>thozhil</i> that the fishermen used to flag their stances of refusal, and also showing how collective assemblies became instrumental in challenging Ennore's polluting industries, the article argues that refusal not only helped the fishermen forge lives and make claims in places that were becoming more industrial and toxic but also mediated their relationship to a place they knew as, and desired to continue calling, their home.</p>","PeriodicalId":51423,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Anthropology","volume":"40 3","pages":"543-569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.14506/ca40.3.07","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.14506/ca40.3.07","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article shows how acts of refusal mediated different experiences of uncertainty among the artisanal fishermen who lived and worked in Ennore's (Chennai, India) polluted landscape. In uncovering how some of these uncertainties were experienced as a result of histories of urban segregation that rendered peripheral locations like Ennore seemingly appropriate to house polluting industries, and thereafter sustained through the bodily demands of thozhil (the profession of artisanal fishing) in a contaminated river, the article posits acts of partial, processual, and contradictory forms of refusal as ways in which different fishermen reconciled some of their experiences of living with Ennore's petrochemical pollution. In critically engaging emic terms like area and thozhil that the fishermen used to flag their stances of refusal, and also showing how collective assemblies became instrumental in challenging Ennore's polluting industries, the article argues that refusal not only helped the fishermen forge lives and make claims in places that were becoming more industrial and toxic but also mediated their relationship to a place they knew as, and desired to continue calling, their home.

Abstract Image

“他们会做我们的事吗?”:北金奈的有毒工业化、不确定性和拒绝
这篇文章展示了在印度钦奈被污染的景观中生活和工作的手工渔民中,拒绝行为是如何介导不同的不确定性体验的。在揭示这些不确定性是如何作为城市隔离历史的结果而经历的,这种历史使得像埃诺尔这样的外围地区似乎适合容纳污染工业,并且此后通过在受污染的河流中进行thozhil(手工捕鱼职业)的身体需求得以维持,文章假设了部分的,过程的,以及相互矛盾的拒绝形式,作为不同的渔民调和他们与埃诺尔石化污染的生活经历的方式。渔民们用诸如area和thozhil等极具吸引力的专业术语来表达他们的拒绝立场,同时也展示了集体集会如何成为挑战埃诺尔污染工业的工具。文章认为,拒绝不仅帮助渔民们在变得更加工业化和有毒的地方建立了生活,并提出了要求,而且还调解了他们与一个他们知道并希望继续称之为家的地方的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cultural Anthropology
Cultural Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Cultural Anthropology publishes ethnographic writing informed by a wide array of theoretical perspectives, innovative in form and content, and focused on both traditional and emerging topics. It also welcomes essays concerned with ethnographic methods and research design in historical perspective, and with ways cultural analysis can address broader public audiences and interests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信