A comprehensive systematic literature review on artificial intelligence for error correction and modulation schemes in next-generation satellite communications
IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Ekta Sharma, Christopher P. Davey, Ravinesh C. Deo, Brad D. Carter, Sancho Salcedo-Sanz
{"title":"A comprehensive systematic literature review on artificial intelligence for error correction and modulation schemes in next-generation satellite communications","authors":"Ekta Sharma, Christopher P. Davey, Ravinesh C. Deo, Brad D. Carter, Sancho Salcedo-Sanz","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11317-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Communication systems continue to embrace the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in error correction codes (ECC) with coded modulation schemes (CMS). Despite this, there remains a substantial performance gap in AI methods in terrestrial and satellite communication systems. Additionally, AI and power efficiency for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites have shown a critical gap. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first Systematic literature review attempting to bridge this vital gap to boost efficiency and add fault tolerance. From 389 articles published between 1993 and 2023, the construction and performance of 33 AI algorithms have been comprehensively reviewed for 16 ECC, seven higher-order CMS, and LEO satellites. Based on four key parameters: error correction, modulation, power, and energy efficiency, the PRISMA strategy with a 27-item checklist was adopted and 63 studies were selected to investigate the AI-based performance of terrestrial (40-studies) and LEO satellites (23-studies). Analysing nine performance metrics, Convolutional Neural Network was the most popular choice (20.6%) with an accuracy of 99% and SNR from 6-20dB, followed by Deep Neural Network (19.04%). The least used algorithm was Reinforcement learning (9.52%). Modified Reed Solomon codes showed the best measurement of power consumption and error rate. Adaptive LDPC codes provided a 45% increase in energy efficiency with an 11% computation decrease. Considering appropriate merits and challenges, the review identifies, discusses, and synthesises AI results to create a summary of current evidence for terrestrial and LEO satellites contributing to evidence-based practice for future researchers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11317-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11317-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Communication systems continue to embrace the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in error correction codes (ECC) with coded modulation schemes (CMS). Despite this, there remains a substantial performance gap in AI methods in terrestrial and satellite communication systems. Additionally, AI and power efficiency for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites have shown a critical gap. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first Systematic literature review attempting to bridge this vital gap to boost efficiency and add fault tolerance. From 389 articles published between 1993 and 2023, the construction and performance of 33 AI algorithms have been comprehensively reviewed for 16 ECC, seven higher-order CMS, and LEO satellites. Based on four key parameters: error correction, modulation, power, and energy efficiency, the PRISMA strategy with a 27-item checklist was adopted and 63 studies were selected to investigate the AI-based performance of terrestrial (40-studies) and LEO satellites (23-studies). Analysing nine performance metrics, Convolutional Neural Network was the most popular choice (20.6%) with an accuracy of 99% and SNR from 6-20dB, followed by Deep Neural Network (19.04%). The least used algorithm was Reinforcement learning (9.52%). Modified Reed Solomon codes showed the best measurement of power consumption and error rate. Adaptive LDPC codes provided a 45% increase in energy efficiency with an 11% computation decrease. Considering appropriate merits and challenges, the review identifies, discusses, and synthesises AI results to create a summary of current evidence for terrestrial and LEO satellites contributing to evidence-based practice for future researchers.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.