A comprehensive systematic literature review on artificial intelligence for error correction and modulation schemes in next-generation satellite communications

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Ekta Sharma, Christopher P. Davey, Ravinesh C. Deo, Brad D. Carter, Sancho Salcedo-Sanz
{"title":"A comprehensive systematic literature review on artificial intelligence for error correction and modulation schemes in next-generation satellite communications","authors":"Ekta Sharma,&nbsp;Christopher P. Davey,&nbsp;Ravinesh C. Deo,&nbsp;Brad D. Carter,&nbsp;Sancho Salcedo-Sanz","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11317-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Communication systems continue to embrace the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in error correction codes (ECC) with coded modulation schemes (CMS). Despite this, there remains a substantial performance gap in AI methods in terrestrial and satellite communication systems. Additionally, AI and power efficiency for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites have shown a critical gap. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first Systematic literature review attempting to bridge this vital gap to boost efficiency and add fault tolerance. From 389 articles published between 1993 and 2023, the construction and performance of 33 AI algorithms have been comprehensively reviewed for 16 ECC, seven higher-order CMS, and LEO satellites. Based on four key parameters: error correction, modulation, power, and energy efficiency, the PRISMA strategy with a 27-item checklist was adopted and 63 studies were selected to investigate the AI-based performance of terrestrial (40-studies) and LEO satellites (23-studies). Analysing nine performance metrics, Convolutional Neural Network was the most popular choice (20.6%) with an accuracy of 99% and SNR from 6-20dB, followed by Deep Neural Network (19.04%). The least used algorithm was Reinforcement learning (9.52%). Modified Reed Solomon codes showed the best measurement of power consumption and error rate. Adaptive LDPC codes provided a 45% increase in energy efficiency with an 11% computation decrease. Considering appropriate merits and challenges, the review identifies, discusses, and synthesises AI results to create a summary of current evidence for terrestrial and LEO satellites contributing to evidence-based practice for future researchers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11317-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11317-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Communication systems continue to embrace the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in error correction codes (ECC) with coded modulation schemes (CMS). Despite this, there remains a substantial performance gap in AI methods in terrestrial and satellite communication systems. Additionally, AI and power efficiency for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites have shown a critical gap. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first Systematic literature review attempting to bridge this vital gap to boost efficiency and add fault tolerance. From 389 articles published between 1993 and 2023, the construction and performance of 33 AI algorithms have been comprehensively reviewed for 16 ECC, seven higher-order CMS, and LEO satellites. Based on four key parameters: error correction, modulation, power, and energy efficiency, the PRISMA strategy with a 27-item checklist was adopted and 63 studies were selected to investigate the AI-based performance of terrestrial (40-studies) and LEO satellites (23-studies). Analysing nine performance metrics, Convolutional Neural Network was the most popular choice (20.6%) with an accuracy of 99% and SNR from 6-20dB, followed by Deep Neural Network (19.04%). The least used algorithm was Reinforcement learning (9.52%). Modified Reed Solomon codes showed the best measurement of power consumption and error rate. Adaptive LDPC codes provided a 45% increase in energy efficiency with an 11% computation decrease. Considering appropriate merits and challenges, the review identifies, discusses, and synthesises AI results to create a summary of current evidence for terrestrial and LEO satellites contributing to evidence-based practice for future researchers.

对下一代卫星通信中用于纠错和调制方案的人工智能进行了全面系统的文献综述
通信系统继续在纠错码(ECC)和编码调制方案(CMS)中拥抱人工智能(AI)的潜力。尽管如此,人工智能方法在地面和卫星通信系统中的性能差距仍然很大。此外,低地球轨道(LEO)卫星的人工智能和功率效率也出现了严重差距。据作者所知,这是第一个试图弥合这一重要差距以提高效率和增加容错性的系统文献综述。从1993年至2023年间发表的389篇文章中,对16颗ECC卫星、7颗高阶CMS卫星和LEO卫星的33种人工智能算法的构建和性能进行了全面综述。基于误差校正、调制、功率和能源效率四个关键参数,采用PRISMA策略和27项清单,选择63项研究来研究基于人工智能的地面卫星(40项研究)和低轨道卫星(23项研究)的性能。分析9个性能指标,卷积神经网络是最受欢迎的选择(20.6%),准确率为99%,信噪比为6-20dB,其次是深度神经网络(19.04%)。使用最少的算法是强化学习(9.52%)。改进的Reed Solomon代码显示了最佳的功耗和错误率测量。自适应LDPC代码提供了45%的能源效率提高与11%的计算减少。考虑到适当的优点和挑战,该综述确定、讨论和综合了人工智能结果,以创建地面和低轨道卫星的当前证据摘要,为未来的研究人员提供基于证据的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信