Reciprocal within-person relations between pandemic fatigue and protective behavior: A 20-wave longitudinal study during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Maie Stein, Hannes Zacher, Cort W Rudolph, Robert Böhm
{"title":"Reciprocal within-person relations between pandemic fatigue and protective behavior: A 20-wave longitudinal study during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Maie Stein, Hannes Zacher, Cort W Rudolph, Robert Böhm","doi":"10.1037/hea0001551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns emerged that pandemic fatigue might undermine people's adherence to recommended protective behaviors, such as mask wearing and physical distancing. Consistent with psychological resource theories, empirical evidence has partly supported this, suggesting that pandemic fatigue is negatively related to protective behaviors. However, most findings are based on cross-sectional research designs, leaving open the possibility for reverse causality, such that engaging in protective behaviors reduces pandemic fatigue. Indeed, such negative effects of protective behavior on pandemic fatigue are consistent with arguments based on self-perception theory. This study aims to advance the understanding of how pandemic fatigue and protective behavior are related to one another over time by examining reciprocal within-person associations between these variables.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected from <i>n</i> = 1,488 employed adults in Germany across 20 monthly measurement waves during the COVID-19 pandemic (May 2021-December 2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A random intercept cross-lagged panel model revealed that pandemic fatigue negatively predicted protective behavior in the subsequent month at the within-person level-and, notably, the reverse effect was also observed, such that protective behavior negatively predicted pandemic fatigue in the subsequent month.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the reciprocal nature of relations between pandemic fatigue and protective behavior and challenge the assumption that adherence to protective behaviors inevitably results in increasing pandemic fatigue over time. These insights can inform the design of more effective interventions to sustain adherence to protective measures and mitigate the risk of pandemic fatigue in future public health crises. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001551","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns emerged that pandemic fatigue might undermine people's adherence to recommended protective behaviors, such as mask wearing and physical distancing. Consistent with psychological resource theories, empirical evidence has partly supported this, suggesting that pandemic fatigue is negatively related to protective behaviors. However, most findings are based on cross-sectional research designs, leaving open the possibility for reverse causality, such that engaging in protective behaviors reduces pandemic fatigue. Indeed, such negative effects of protective behavior on pandemic fatigue are consistent with arguments based on self-perception theory. This study aims to advance the understanding of how pandemic fatigue and protective behavior are related to one another over time by examining reciprocal within-person associations between these variables.

Method: Data were collected from n = 1,488 employed adults in Germany across 20 monthly measurement waves during the COVID-19 pandemic (May 2021-December 2022).

Results: A random intercept cross-lagged panel model revealed that pandemic fatigue negatively predicted protective behavior in the subsequent month at the within-person level-and, notably, the reverse effect was also observed, such that protective behavior negatively predicted pandemic fatigue in the subsequent month.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the reciprocal nature of relations between pandemic fatigue and protective behavior and challenge the assumption that adherence to protective behaviors inevitably results in increasing pandemic fatigue over time. These insights can inform the design of more effective interventions to sustain adherence to protective measures and mitigate the risk of pandemic fatigue in future public health crises. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

大流行疲劳与防护行为之间的人际关系:COVID-19大流行期间的20波纵向研究
目的:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,人们担心大流行疲劳可能会破坏人们遵守建议的保护行为,如戴口罩和保持身体距离。与心理资源理论一致,经验证据在一定程度上支持了这一点,表明大流行疲劳与保护行为呈负相关。然而,大多数发现都是基于横断面研究设计,这为反向因果关系留下了可能性,例如参与保护行为可以减少大流行疲劳。事实上,保护行为对流行病疲劳的这种负面影响与基于自我认知理论的论点是一致的。本研究旨在通过检查这些变量之间的相互人际关系,促进对大流行疲劳和保护行为如何随着时间的推移相互关联的理解。方法:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间(2021年5月至2022年12月),通过20个月的测量波收集了德国n = 1488名在职成年人的数据。结果:随机截距交叉滞后面板模型显示,大流行疲劳负向预测下一个月的个人层面的保护行为,值得注意的是,还观察到反向效应,即保护行为负向预测下一个月的大流行疲劳。结论:我们的研究结果强调了大流行疲劳和保护行为之间关系的相互性质,并挑战了坚持保护行为不可避免地导致随着时间的推移而增加大流行疲劳的假设。这些见解可以为设计更有效的干预措施提供信息,以在未来的公共卫生危机中维持对保护措施的遵守并减轻大流行疲劳的风险。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信