Identifying Gaps in Care Quality for Seriously Ill Medicare Advantage Enrollees.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rebecca Anhang Price, Anagha Tolpadi, Melissa A Bradley, Maria DeYoreo, Marc N Elliott, Joan M Teno, William Brodnitzki, Jason X Chen, Anna Gosline, Stephanie Chan
{"title":"Identifying Gaps in Care Quality for Seriously Ill Medicare Advantage Enrollees.","authors":"Rebecca Anhang Price, Anagha Tolpadi, Melissa A Bradley, Maria DeYoreo, Marc N Elliott, Joan M Teno, William Brodnitzki, Jason X Chen, Anna Gosline, Stephanie Chan","doi":"10.1177/10966218251381011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Increasingly, seriously ill Americans are ensured by Medicare Advantage (MA). However, standardized assessments of MA care quality do not highlight their unique experiences and needs. We adapted a previously validated survey to describe care experiences of seriously ill MA enrollees and highlight areas of unmet need for quality improvement. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> This is a cross-sectional study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We sampled 3500 MA enrollees with the highest Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) scores within one MA organization and administered a validated patient Serious Illness Survey for Home-Based Programs assessing communication, care coordination, symptom management, and planning for care in July and August 2023. We calculated top-box scores for all respondents and used linear regressions to calculate adjusted scores for subgroups of respondents meeting alternate serious illness definitions. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 1412 respondents, 84.6% had three or more chronic conditions. Responses indicated substantial room for improvement across quality measures assessed, with just 59.6% and 56.9% of respondents reporting that their communication and care coordination needs were met, respectively; 52.8% reporting that they \"definitely\" got the help they wanted for their symptoms; and 38.8% indicating that they had \"definitely\" discussed planning for care with their health care professionals. Respondents with HCC risk scores of ≥3 plus recent health care utilization also reported considerable unmet needs. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Seriously ill MA enrollees have important unmet needs for care planning, care coordination, communication, and symptom management that are not highlighted by existing quality measures, but can be addressed through evidence-based interventions. Assessing care quality for seriously ill enrollees using standardized, survey-based measures can help to identify actionable improvement targets for this high-need, high-cost group.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10966218251381011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Increasingly, seriously ill Americans are ensured by Medicare Advantage (MA). However, standardized assessments of MA care quality do not highlight their unique experiences and needs. We adapted a previously validated survey to describe care experiences of seriously ill MA enrollees and highlight areas of unmet need for quality improvement. Study Design: This is a cross-sectional study. Methods: We sampled 3500 MA enrollees with the highest Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) scores within one MA organization and administered a validated patient Serious Illness Survey for Home-Based Programs assessing communication, care coordination, symptom management, and planning for care in July and August 2023. We calculated top-box scores for all respondents and used linear regressions to calculate adjusted scores for subgroups of respondents meeting alternate serious illness definitions. Results: Of 1412 respondents, 84.6% had three or more chronic conditions. Responses indicated substantial room for improvement across quality measures assessed, with just 59.6% and 56.9% of respondents reporting that their communication and care coordination needs were met, respectively; 52.8% reporting that they "definitely" got the help they wanted for their symptoms; and 38.8% indicating that they had "definitely" discussed planning for care with their health care professionals. Respondents with HCC risk scores of ≥3 plus recent health care utilization also reported considerable unmet needs. Conclusions: Seriously ill MA enrollees have important unmet needs for care planning, care coordination, communication, and symptom management that are not highlighted by existing quality measures, but can be addressed through evidence-based interventions. Assessing care quality for seriously ill enrollees using standardized, survey-based measures can help to identify actionable improvement targets for this high-need, high-cost group.

识别重症医疗保险优势参保人的护理质量差距。
目标:越来越多的重病美国人得到医疗保险优势(MA)的保障。然而,对MA护理质量的标准化评估并没有突出他们独特的经历和需求。我们改编了一项先前经过验证的调查,以描述重病MA登记者的护理经历,并强调未满足质量改进需求的领域。研究设计:这是一项横断面研究。方法:我们在一个MA组织中抽样了3500名分级条件类别(HCC)评分最高的MA入组者,并在2023年7月和8月对家庭项目进行了有效的患者严重疾病调查,评估沟通、护理协调、症状管理和护理计划。我们计算了所有受访者的顶盒得分,并使用线性回归计算符合交替严重疾病定义的受访者亚组的调整得分。结果:在1412名受访者中,84.6%患有三种或三种以上的慢性疾病。回应表明,在评估的质量措施中有很大的改进空间,分别只有59.6%和56.9%的受访者报告他们的沟通和护理协调需求得到了满足;52.8%的人报告说,他们“肯定”得到了他们想要的治疗症状的帮助;38.8%的人表示,他们“肯定”与医疗保健专业人员讨论过护理计划。HCC风险评分≥3加上近期医疗保健利用的受访者也报告了大量未满足的需求。结论:重症MA患者在护理计划、护理协调、沟通和症状管理方面有重要的未满足需求,现有的质量措施没有强调这些需求,但可以通过循证干预措施加以解决。使用标准化的、基于调查的措施来评估重症患者的护理质量,有助于为这一高需求、高成本群体确定可操作的改进目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信