Dyadic Profiles of Romantic Partners' Suicidal Risk and Relationship Distress Presenting for Couples Therapy

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2025-09-26 DOI:10.1111/famp.70074
Preston C. Morgan, Heather A. Love, Garrin L. Morlan, Quintin A. Hunt
{"title":"Dyadic Profiles of Romantic Partners' Suicidal Risk and Relationship Distress Presenting for Couples Therapy","authors":"Preston C. Morgan,&nbsp;Heather A. Love,&nbsp;Garrin L. Morlan,&nbsp;Quintin A. Hunt","doi":"10.1111/famp.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Despite the prominence of individuals presenting for therapy with suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs), there is little research available that examines how one or both members of a couple experience STBs when presenting for couple therapy. Thus, there is a prominent gap in the literature in understanding the types of STBs for both adult partners in a committed romantic relationship presenting for couple therapy, reducing clinicians' preparedness to address suicidality in this unique therapy modality. We applied the Three-Step Theory as a guiding framework to investigate the types of couples with suicidal risk that present to couple therapy. We used clinical data from the Marriage and Family Therapy Practice Research Network (<i>n</i> = 337 couples) to identify Dyadic Latent Profiles. We determined a three-profile model: Profile 1: Minimal Risk; Profile 2: Active and Passive Risk; and Profile 3: Both Passive Risk. However, nearly all predictors and covariates (e.g., biological sex, race, relationship duration, mental health treatment, pressure to attend therapy, and intimate partner violence) were not associated with profile membership. These results indicate that while most couples who attend couple therapy are unlikely to display elevated suicide risk, 7% of the sample (Profile 2) displayed active risk based on the Three-Step Theory of suicide. These findings aid clinicians in understanding that a small number of couples present an active risk. Results further encourage clinicians to assess STBs with continuous and not binary assessment questions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":"64 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the prominence of individuals presenting for therapy with suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs), there is little research available that examines how one or both members of a couple experience STBs when presenting for couple therapy. Thus, there is a prominent gap in the literature in understanding the types of STBs for both adult partners in a committed romantic relationship presenting for couple therapy, reducing clinicians' preparedness to address suicidality in this unique therapy modality. We applied the Three-Step Theory as a guiding framework to investigate the types of couples with suicidal risk that present to couple therapy. We used clinical data from the Marriage and Family Therapy Practice Research Network (n = 337 couples) to identify Dyadic Latent Profiles. We determined a three-profile model: Profile 1: Minimal Risk; Profile 2: Active and Passive Risk; and Profile 3: Both Passive Risk. However, nearly all predictors and covariates (e.g., biological sex, race, relationship duration, mental health treatment, pressure to attend therapy, and intimate partner violence) were not associated with profile membership. These results indicate that while most couples who attend couple therapy are unlikely to display elevated suicide risk, 7% of the sample (Profile 2) displayed active risk based on the Three-Step Theory of suicide. These findings aid clinicians in understanding that a small number of couples present an active risk. Results further encourage clinicians to assess STBs with continuous and not binary assessment questions.

Abstract Image

伴侣自杀风险和关系困扰的二元特征在夫妻治疗中的表现
尽管以自杀想法和行为(STBs)来治疗的个体很突出,但很少有研究调查夫妻中的一方或双方在进行夫妻治疗时如何经历STBs。因此,在了解性传播感染的类型方面,文献中有一个明显的差距,在一个承诺的浪漫关系中,成年伴侣双方都表现为夫妻治疗,减少了临床医生在这种独特的治疗方式中解决自杀问题的准备。我们应用三步理论作为指导框架来调查有自杀风险的夫妇的类型,目前的夫妻治疗。我们使用来自婚姻和家庭治疗实践研究网络(n = 337对夫妇)的临床数据来确定二元潜在谱。我们确定了一个三特征模型:特征1:最小风险;概况2:主动和被动风险;和概况3:都是被动风险。然而,几乎所有的预测因子和协变量(例如,生理性别、种族、关系持续时间、精神健康治疗、参加治疗的压力和亲密伴侣暴力)都与概况成员无关。这些结果表明,虽然大多数参加夫妻治疗的夫妇不太可能表现出更高的自杀风险,但根据自杀三步理论,7%的样本(图2)表现出积极的自杀风险。这些发现有助于临床医生理解少数夫妇存在主动风险。结果进一步鼓励临床医生用连续的而不是二元的评估问题来评估性传播感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信