Exploring Staff Perceptions and Experiences in Services Providing Different Levels of Active Support.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Jill Bradshaw, Beckie Whelton, Julie Beadle-Brown, Lisa Richardson, Jennifer Leigh
{"title":"Exploring Staff Perceptions and Experiences in Services Providing Different Levels of Active Support.","authors":"Jill Bradshaw, Beckie Whelton, Julie Beadle-Brown, Lisa Richardson, Jennifer Leigh","doi":"10.1111/jir.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Outcomes for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, particularly those with more severe and complex needs, depend on the quality of support they receive from staff. This paper explores staff perspectives on skilled support and relationships with training and experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaires were received from 93 staff working in 28 supported accommodation services in which observations of the quality of support had also been conducted. Staff were asked about experience, training and views on skilled support. Content analysis was used to code written responses. Statistical analysis explored relationships between staff responses, and the quality of support was observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Staff perceived improving the quality of life of people they supported as key. All staff considered themselves as being at least partially skilled, with the majority associating being skilled with length of experience and attendance at training. Specific training was rarely mentioned, and receipt of training was not associated with the provision of better quality of support. Practice leadership was rarely mentioned.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In most cases, staff showed awareness of the principles set out in policy, but their reflections did not match observed practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Outcomes for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, particularly those with more severe and complex needs, depend on the quality of support they receive from staff. This paper explores staff perspectives on skilled support and relationships with training and experience.

Methods: Questionnaires were received from 93 staff working in 28 supported accommodation services in which observations of the quality of support had also been conducted. Staff were asked about experience, training and views on skilled support. Content analysis was used to code written responses. Statistical analysis explored relationships between staff responses, and the quality of support was observed.

Results: Staff perceived improving the quality of life of people they supported as key. All staff considered themselves as being at least partially skilled, with the majority associating being skilled with length of experience and attendance at training. Specific training was rarely mentioned, and receipt of training was not associated with the provision of better quality of support. Practice leadership was rarely mentioned.

Conclusions: In most cases, staff showed awareness of the principles set out in policy, but their reflections did not match observed practice.

探讨员工对提供不同程度积极支援的服务的看法和经验。
简介:智力和发育障碍者,特别是那些有更严重和复杂需求的人的结果取决于他们从工作人员那里得到的支持的质量。本文探讨了员工对技术支持以及与培训和经验的关系的看法。方法:对28个支助性住宿服务机构的93名工作人员进行问卷调查,并对支助质量进行了观察。工作人员被问及经验、培训和对熟练支持的看法。内容分析用于对书面回复进行编码。统计分析探讨了工作人员回答之间的关系,并观察了支持的质量。结果:工作人员认为改善他们所支持的人的生活质量是关键。所有工作人员都认为自己至少是部分熟练的,大多数人把熟练与经验的长短和参加培训的次数联系起来。很少提到具体的培训,接受培训与提供更优质的支助没有联系。实践领导很少被提及。结论:在大多数情况下,工作人员表示意识到政策中规定的原则,但他们的反思与观察到的实践不符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信