{"title":"Financing agricultural innovation: Challenges and alternatives to venture capital in the AgTech sector","authors":"Jorge Fernandez-Vidal , Silverio Alarcon","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agricultural innovation is crucial for enhancing productivity, sustainability, and global food security. However, traditional venture capital (VC) models, designed for fast-scaling, high-liquidity sectors, often clash with the biological and regional realities of agriculture. This study examines financing frictions in AgTech by drawing on 71 semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs, investors, farmers, and policymakers across five continents. We identify three primary tensions: (1) a misalignment between VC time horizons and agricultural innovation cycles; (2) the critical role of alternative patient capital (e.g., government grants, corporate strategic investments) in supporting AgTech venture survival and addressing some of the shortcomings of VC; and (3) significant regional heterogeneity that complicates global scaling. Our findings extend theories of entrepreneurial finance by illustrating how sector-specific characteristics disrupt standard investment models. We provide actionable insights for investors, entrepreneurs, agricultural policymakers, and development agencies seeking to foster innovation ecosystems that align with the slower pace of biological and environmental systems. The study highlights the importance of designing financing structures that respect, rather than attempt to override, the natural rhythms of agricultural development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 102967"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225001721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Agricultural innovation is crucial for enhancing productivity, sustainability, and global food security. However, traditional venture capital (VC) models, designed for fast-scaling, high-liquidity sectors, often clash with the biological and regional realities of agriculture. This study examines financing frictions in AgTech by drawing on 71 semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs, investors, farmers, and policymakers across five continents. We identify three primary tensions: (1) a misalignment between VC time horizons and agricultural innovation cycles; (2) the critical role of alternative patient capital (e.g., government grants, corporate strategic investments) in supporting AgTech venture survival and addressing some of the shortcomings of VC; and (3) significant regional heterogeneity that complicates global scaling. Our findings extend theories of entrepreneurial finance by illustrating how sector-specific characteristics disrupt standard investment models. We provide actionable insights for investors, entrepreneurs, agricultural policymakers, and development agencies seeking to foster innovation ecosystems that align with the slower pace of biological and environmental systems. The study highlights the importance of designing financing structures that respect, rather than attempt to override, the natural rhythms of agricultural development.
期刊介绍:
Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies.
Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.