In vitro disruption of the retinoic acid signaling pathway by industrial chemicals and pharmaceuticals

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Anna Kjerstine Rosenmai , Jisun Paik , Eva Bay Wedebye , Nichlas Davidsen , Cecillie Henriksen , Mikala Melchiors , Terje Svingen
{"title":"In vitro disruption of the retinoic acid signaling pathway by industrial chemicals and pharmaceuticals","authors":"Anna Kjerstine Rosenmai ,&nbsp;Jisun Paik ,&nbsp;Eva Bay Wedebye ,&nbsp;Nichlas Davidsen ,&nbsp;Cecillie Henriksen ,&nbsp;Mikala Melchiors ,&nbsp;Terje Svingen","doi":"10.1016/j.taap.2025.117577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disruption of the retinoid signaling pathway by environmental chemicals is currently not directly assessed in regulatory testing. Although in vitro and in silico methods are available to assess disruption of this modality, more data on the selectivity and in vivo predictivity of specific assays are needed. To address this, we tested twenty-one pesticides and pharmaceuticals for their ability to agonize or antagonize the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα) or to inhibit the activity of aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH1As). Experimental data was generated using a RARα reporter gene assay and a cell line stably transfected to express two isoforms of ALDH1A for enzyme inhibition assay. The measured output of the latter was synthesized retinoic acid (RA) converted from added retinal. RARα antagonism predictions were obtained from the Danish (Q)SAR Database. Several test compounds acted as RAR agonists, while only a few inhibited ALDH1As, suggesting that the two assays together provide a more comprehensive view of how compounds impact RA signaling. Some substances were active in only one of the in vitro assays, highlighting the importance of including both models to avoid false negatives. No clear pattern was seen to suggest that either endpoint was more predictive of in vivo effects. Collectively, these findings underscore the need to include more assays for detecting different mechanisms of retinoid signal disruption in future testing regimens relying less on in vivo toxicity observation and more on predictive methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23174,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology and applied pharmacology","volume":"505 ","pages":"Article 117577"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology and applied pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041008X25003539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disruption of the retinoid signaling pathway by environmental chemicals is currently not directly assessed in regulatory testing. Although in vitro and in silico methods are available to assess disruption of this modality, more data on the selectivity and in vivo predictivity of specific assays are needed. To address this, we tested twenty-one pesticides and pharmaceuticals for their ability to agonize or antagonize the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα) or to inhibit the activity of aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH1As). Experimental data was generated using a RARα reporter gene assay and a cell line stably transfected to express two isoforms of ALDH1A for enzyme inhibition assay. The measured output of the latter was synthesized retinoic acid (RA) converted from added retinal. RARα antagonism predictions were obtained from the Danish (Q)SAR Database. Several test compounds acted as RAR agonists, while only a few inhibited ALDH1As, suggesting that the two assays together provide a more comprehensive view of how compounds impact RA signaling. Some substances were active in only one of the in vitro assays, highlighting the importance of including both models to avoid false negatives. No clear pattern was seen to suggest that either endpoint was more predictive of in vivo effects. Collectively, these findings underscore the need to include more assays for detecting different mechanisms of retinoid signal disruption in future testing regimens relying less on in vivo toxicity observation and more on predictive methods.
工业化学品和药物对维甲酸信号通路的体外破坏。
环境化学物质对类视黄醇信号通路的破坏目前还没有在监管测试中直接评估。尽管体外和计算机方法可用于评估这种模式的破坏,但需要更多关于特异性测定的选择性和体内预测性的数据。为了解决这个问题,我们测试了21种农药和药物对视黄酸受体α (RARα)的痛苦或拮抗能力或对醛脱氢酶(ALDH1As)活性的抑制能力。实验数据是通过RARα报告基因实验和稳定转染表达两种ALDH1A亚型的细胞系进行酶抑制实验产生的。后者的测量输出是由添加的视网膜合成的视黄酸(RA)。RARα拮抗预测来自丹麦(Q)SAR数据库。几种测试化合物作为RAR激动剂,而只有少数抑制aldh1a,这表明这两种试验一起提供了化合物如何影响RA信号传导的更全面的观点。一些物质仅在一种体外分析中有活性,突出了包括两种模型以避免假阴性的重要性。没有明确的模式表明任何一个终点更能预测体内效应。总的来说,这些发现强调了在未来的测试方案中,需要更多的检测方法来检测类视黄醇信号破坏的不同机制,而不是依赖于体内毒性观察,而是更多地依赖于预测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
309
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology publishes original scientific research of relevance to animals or humans pertaining to the action of chemicals, drugs, or chemically-defined natural products. Regular articles address mechanistic approaches to physiological, pharmacologic, biochemical, cellular, or molecular understanding of toxicologic/pathologic lesions and to methods used to describe these responses. Safety Science articles address outstanding state-of-the-art preclinical and human translational characterization of drug and chemical safety employing cutting-edge science. Highly significant Regulatory Safety Science articles will also be considered in this category. Papers concerned with alternatives to the use of experimental animals are encouraged. Short articles report on high impact studies of broad interest to readers of TAAP that would benefit from rapid publication. These articles should contain no more than a combined total of four figures and tables. Authors should include in their cover letter the justification for consideration of their manuscript as a short article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信