Systemic neglect hidden behind tolerance: the reproduction of vulnerability among aging heroin users within the community-based rehabilitation.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-06-23 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf066
Apei Song, Jiaojiao He, Zixi Liu
{"title":"Systemic neglect hidden behind tolerance: the reproduction of vulnerability among aging heroin users within the community-based rehabilitation.","authors":"Apei Song, Jiaojiao He, Zixi Liu","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Contemporary Chinese drug governance is shifting its focus toward the rehabilitation of people who use drugs, prioritizing restorative over punitive measures. Moving beyond previous research that has primarily focused on the importance of community-based rehabilitation mechanisms in facilitating social reintegration, this study aimed to understand aging heroin users' experiences within broader systems of power, citizenship, and social exclusion in China.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted fieldwork in a city in the eastern region in China in 2020-2021 and interviewed 12 heroin users aged 65-75 years. We employed Atkinson's life story interview as an approach to collect data and Abbott's group life course to examine how aging heroin users, both as individuals and as a cohort with distinct drug experiences and aging traits, narrate their interactions within the national rehabilitation programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings contend that older heroin users, even after testing positive, receive lenient institutional treatment, often exempting them from compulsory rehabilitation due to age-related health issues and care burdens. To mitigate the risk of overdose, drug enforcement authorities utilize social welfare programs as a means of promoting self-management among aging users. However, this approach neglects the general well-being needs of the older population. Moreover, drug social workers often overlook aging users as clients for their casework because of performance and tangling professional ethics. The systematic neglect thus formed, and it provokes reflection on the position of aging users and how they seek to be citizens but are excluded by the \"violence of citizenship.\"</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>We found the systematic neglect experienced by aging heroin users through the judicial process, welfare programs, and service practices. This structural disadvantage, more important than their needs, underscores the urgent value of addressing the social issues surrounding their marginalized position in society.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 8","pages":"igaf066"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Contemporary Chinese drug governance is shifting its focus toward the rehabilitation of people who use drugs, prioritizing restorative over punitive measures. Moving beyond previous research that has primarily focused on the importance of community-based rehabilitation mechanisms in facilitating social reintegration, this study aimed to understand aging heroin users' experiences within broader systems of power, citizenship, and social exclusion in China.

Research design and methods: We conducted fieldwork in a city in the eastern region in China in 2020-2021 and interviewed 12 heroin users aged 65-75 years. We employed Atkinson's life story interview as an approach to collect data and Abbott's group life course to examine how aging heroin users, both as individuals and as a cohort with distinct drug experiences and aging traits, narrate their interactions within the national rehabilitation programs.

Results: Our findings contend that older heroin users, even after testing positive, receive lenient institutional treatment, often exempting them from compulsory rehabilitation due to age-related health issues and care burdens. To mitigate the risk of overdose, drug enforcement authorities utilize social welfare programs as a means of promoting self-management among aging users. However, this approach neglects the general well-being needs of the older population. Moreover, drug social workers often overlook aging users as clients for their casework because of performance and tangling professional ethics. The systematic neglect thus formed, and it provokes reflection on the position of aging users and how they seek to be citizens but are excluded by the "violence of citizenship."

Discussion and implications: We found the systematic neglect experienced by aging heroin users through the judicial process, welfare programs, and service practices. This structural disadvantage, more important than their needs, underscores the urgent value of addressing the social issues surrounding their marginalized position in society.

宽容背后隐藏的系统性忽视:社区康复中老年海洛因使用者脆弱性的再现。
背景和目的:当代中国药物治理的重点正在转向对吸毒者的康复,将恢复性措施置于惩罚性措施之上。以往的研究主要关注社区康复机制在促进社会重新融合方面的重要性,而本研究旨在了解中国更广泛的权力、公民身份和社会排斥制度下老年海洛因使用者的经历。研究设计与方法:我们于2020-2021年在中国东部某城市进行了实地调查,采访了12名65-75岁的海洛因使用者。我们采用阿特金森的生活故事访谈作为收集数据的方法,并采用雅培的群体生活历程来研究老年海洛因使用者,无论是作为个人还是作为具有不同吸毒经历和衰老特征的群体,如何叙述他们在国家康复计划中的相互作用。结果:我们的研究结果表明,老年海洛因使用者即使在检测呈阳性后,也会得到宽松的机构治疗,通常由于与年龄相关的健康问题和护理负担,他们可以免于强制康复。为了减少过量的风险,毒品执法当局利用社会福利计划作为促进老年使用者自我管理的手段。然而,这种做法忽视了老年人口的一般福祉需求。此外,由于绩效和职业道德的纠缠,毒品社会工作者经常忽视老年吸毒者作为他们个案工作的客户。由此形成的系统性忽视,引发了人们对老年用户地位的反思,以及他们如何寻求成为公民,却被“公民暴力”所排斥。讨论和启示:我们发现老年海洛因使用者在司法程序、福利计划和服务实践中经历了系统性的忽视。这种结构性劣势比他们的需要更为重要,强调了解决围绕他们在社会中处于边缘地位的社会问题的迫切价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信