Veterinary bacteriostatic and ionophore antibiotics in aquatic organisms: A systematic review and scientometric analysis of biomarker and exposure concentrations
{"title":"Veterinary bacteriostatic and ionophore antibiotics in aquatic organisms: A systematic review and scientometric analysis of biomarker and exposure concentrations","authors":"Thaís Pereira Nascimento , Andrea Carina Crupkin , Mirta Luján Menone","doi":"10.1016/j.prerep.2025.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The intensive use of veterinary antibiotics, particularly bacteriostatic agents and ionophores, represents an increasing ecotoxicological concern for aquatic ecosystems. This study integrates scientometric analysis with a systematic literature review specifically aimed at identifying gaps in experimental research addressing the effects of these pharmaceuticals on aquatic organisms through biomarker-based assessments. A total of 648 publications published between 1968 and 2024 were screened; however, only 20 in vivo studies involving 10 aquatic species (7 vertebrates and 3 invertebrates) met the inclusion criteria, of which 17 investigated bacteriostatic antibiotics and 3 ionophores. Acute exposure designs predominated (35 %), followed by subchronic (30 %), chronic (15 %), and combined acute–chronic (20 %) assays. Reported environmental concentrations ranged from nanograms to hundreds of micrograms per liter, whereas experimental exposures frequently reached milligram-per-liter levels — in some cases exceeding environmental concentrations by several orders of magnitude. Observed effects included oxidative stress, immunological alterations, reproductive impairment, embryotoxicity, and histopathological damage. The findings demonstrate a disproportionate reliance on standard model organisms, particularly <em>Danio rerio</em>, and a notable scarcity of studies involving native or ecologically relevant species. This review highlights a critical need for future research to adopt chronic exposure scenarios, incorporate native species, environmentally relevant concentrations, and apply standardized- sensitive biomarkers. Addressing these gaps is essential to advance the environmental risk assessment of veterinary antibiotics and to support more effective and evidence-based environmental policymaking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101015,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Research - Reports","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Research - Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950200425000394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The intensive use of veterinary antibiotics, particularly bacteriostatic agents and ionophores, represents an increasing ecotoxicological concern for aquatic ecosystems. This study integrates scientometric analysis with a systematic literature review specifically aimed at identifying gaps in experimental research addressing the effects of these pharmaceuticals on aquatic organisms through biomarker-based assessments. A total of 648 publications published between 1968 and 2024 were screened; however, only 20 in vivo studies involving 10 aquatic species (7 vertebrates and 3 invertebrates) met the inclusion criteria, of which 17 investigated bacteriostatic antibiotics and 3 ionophores. Acute exposure designs predominated (35 %), followed by subchronic (30 %), chronic (15 %), and combined acute–chronic (20 %) assays. Reported environmental concentrations ranged from nanograms to hundreds of micrograms per liter, whereas experimental exposures frequently reached milligram-per-liter levels — in some cases exceeding environmental concentrations by several orders of magnitude. Observed effects included oxidative stress, immunological alterations, reproductive impairment, embryotoxicity, and histopathological damage. The findings demonstrate a disproportionate reliance on standard model organisms, particularly Danio rerio, and a notable scarcity of studies involving native or ecologically relevant species. This review highlights a critical need for future research to adopt chronic exposure scenarios, incorporate native species, environmentally relevant concentrations, and apply standardized- sensitive biomarkers. Addressing these gaps is essential to advance the environmental risk assessment of veterinary antibiotics and to support more effective and evidence-based environmental policymaking.