{"title":"Discovery of Aromatic Amide Derivatives Bearing Oxime Ethers Targeting Succinate Dehydrogenase.","authors":"Zesheng Hao,Jintao Han,Yue Zhang,Xiaokang Zhang,Kun Li,Haoyin Chen,Zhihong Wang,Wei Gao,Liangfu Tang,Zhijin Fan","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.5c02252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on analyzing the pharmacophore model of commercial succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicides, a molecular database was reasonably designed for computer-aided molecular design, and the potential heterocyclic oxime-ether-containing skeleton was found for derivation. A fungicidal bioassay indicated that the EC50 values of the compounds I-5 (2.23 μg/mL), I-6 (2.15 μg/mL), I-9 (0.07 μg/mL), and I-11 (0.81 μg/mL) showed better in vitro activity against Rhizoctonia solani than that of trifloxystrobin (4.88 μg/mL). Especially, I-9 showed comparable activity to thifluzamide, with EC50 of 0.07 μg/mL vs 0.06 μg/mL, and better activity than fluxapyroxad and boscalid, with EC50 of 0.10 and 2.49 μg/mL, respectively. Like thifluzamide and fluxapyroxad, compounds I-1, I-3, and I-9 showed excellent in vivo activity against R. solani at 200 μg/mL. The IC50 of the R. solani SDH (RsSDH) enzyme of compound I-9 was 0.35 μg/mL, which was near that of fluxapyroxad (0.28 μg/mL). The high potency of I-9 against RsSDH was also reflected in a steeper dose-response tendency in the fluorescence quenching assay, and it was well-docked into the active site of the target enzyme SDH. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies have provided a reasonable explanation for compound I-9 being able to act as a SDHI. Our studies supported that I-9 was a promising SDH-based fungicide highly active compound deserving of further study.","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5c02252","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Based on analyzing the pharmacophore model of commercial succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicides, a molecular database was reasonably designed for computer-aided molecular design, and the potential heterocyclic oxime-ether-containing skeleton was found for derivation. A fungicidal bioassay indicated that the EC50 values of the compounds I-5 (2.23 μg/mL), I-6 (2.15 μg/mL), I-9 (0.07 μg/mL), and I-11 (0.81 μg/mL) showed better in vitro activity against Rhizoctonia solani than that of trifloxystrobin (4.88 μg/mL). Especially, I-9 showed comparable activity to thifluzamide, with EC50 of 0.07 μg/mL vs 0.06 μg/mL, and better activity than fluxapyroxad and boscalid, with EC50 of 0.10 and 2.49 μg/mL, respectively. Like thifluzamide and fluxapyroxad, compounds I-1, I-3, and I-9 showed excellent in vivo activity against R. solani at 200 μg/mL. The IC50 of the R. solani SDH (RsSDH) enzyme of compound I-9 was 0.35 μg/mL, which was near that of fluxapyroxad (0.28 μg/mL). The high potency of I-9 against RsSDH was also reflected in a steeper dose-response tendency in the fluorescence quenching assay, and it was well-docked into the active site of the target enzyme SDH. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies have provided a reasonable explanation for compound I-9 being able to act as a SDHI. Our studies supported that I-9 was a promising SDH-based fungicide highly active compound deserving of further study.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry publishes high-quality, cutting edge original research representing complete studies and research advances dealing with the chemistry and biochemistry of agriculture and food. The Journal also encourages papers with chemistry and/or biochemistry as a major component combined with biological/sensory/nutritional/toxicological evaluation related to agriculture and/or food.