Breakfast Skipping Increases the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Myocardial Infarction: Evidence From the Mendelian Randomization Study

IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Si Cao, Youjie Zeng, Gong Chen
{"title":"Breakfast Skipping Increases the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Myocardial Infarction: Evidence From the Mendelian Randomization Study","authors":"Si Cao,&nbsp;Youjie Zeng,&nbsp;Gong Chen","doi":"10.1002/fsn3.70998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Observational studies have suggested a potential association between breakfast skipping and the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and myocardial infarction (MI). Nevertheless, due to potential confounders and reverse causation, the causal relationship remains unclear. This study aims to comprehensively assess the causal effect of breakfast skipping on CHD and MI through a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Genome-wide summary statistics of breakfast skipping, CHD, and MI were obtained from public databases. Instrument variables (IVs) proxying for breakfast skipping were screened based on strict (<i>p</i> &lt; 5e−8) and lenient (<i>p</i> &lt; 1e−5) thresholds. Quality control of IVs was performed using Cochran's <i>Q</i> test, MR-Egger intercept test, and MR PRESSO global test. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) served as the primary MR method for assessing causal associations, while MR-Egger, weighted median, and maximum likelihood were used as supplementary methods. The effect of breakfast skipping on CHD and MI in both CARDIoGRAMplusC4D and FinnGen cohorts was assessed, and the results were integrated using meta-analysis. Quality control tests showed no heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy in IVs. After conducting a meta-analysis of the MR results from the IVW method under strict IV screening thresholds, breakfast skipping significantly increases the risk of CHD [odds ratio (OR) = 1.358, <i>p</i> = 3.95E−02] and MI (OR = 1.449, <i>p</i> = 4.17E−02). Similarly, meta-analysis of the IVW results under lenient IV screening thresholds also demonstrated the detrimental effects of breakfast skipping on CHD (OR = 1.198, <i>p</i> = 5.55E−03) and MI (OR = 1.378, <i>p</i> = 4.08E−05). Three other MR methods showed parallel results to IVW (OR &gt; 1). Overall, the present study demonstrates that breakfast skipping significantly increases the risk of CHD and MI. Therefore, maintaining a high-quality breakfast intake can be considered an essential primary prevention measure for CHD and MI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12418,"journal":{"name":"Food Science & Nutrition","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fsn3.70998","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.70998","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observational studies have suggested a potential association between breakfast skipping and the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and myocardial infarction (MI). Nevertheless, due to potential confounders and reverse causation, the causal relationship remains unclear. This study aims to comprehensively assess the causal effect of breakfast skipping on CHD and MI through a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Genome-wide summary statistics of breakfast skipping, CHD, and MI were obtained from public databases. Instrument variables (IVs) proxying for breakfast skipping were screened based on strict (p < 5e−8) and lenient (p < 1e−5) thresholds. Quality control of IVs was performed using Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, and MR PRESSO global test. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) served as the primary MR method for assessing causal associations, while MR-Egger, weighted median, and maximum likelihood were used as supplementary methods. The effect of breakfast skipping on CHD and MI in both CARDIoGRAMplusC4D and FinnGen cohorts was assessed, and the results were integrated using meta-analysis. Quality control tests showed no heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy in IVs. After conducting a meta-analysis of the MR results from the IVW method under strict IV screening thresholds, breakfast skipping significantly increases the risk of CHD [odds ratio (OR) = 1.358, p = 3.95E−02] and MI (OR = 1.449, p = 4.17E−02). Similarly, meta-analysis of the IVW results under lenient IV screening thresholds also demonstrated the detrimental effects of breakfast skipping on CHD (OR = 1.198, p = 5.55E−03) and MI (OR = 1.378, p = 4.08E−05). Three other MR methods showed parallel results to IVW (OR > 1). Overall, the present study demonstrates that breakfast skipping significantly increases the risk of CHD and MI. Therefore, maintaining a high-quality breakfast intake can be considered an essential primary prevention measure for CHD and MI.

Abstract Image

不吃早餐增加冠心病和心肌梗死的风险:来自孟德尔随机化研究的证据
观察性研究表明,不吃早餐与冠心病(CHD)和心肌梗死(MI)的风险之间存在潜在关联。然而,由于潜在的混杂因素和反向因果关系,因果关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,全面评估不吃早餐对冠心病和心肌梗死的因果影响。不吃早餐、冠心病和心肌梗死的全基因组汇总统计数据来自公共数据库。根据严格阈值(p < 5e−8)和宽松阈值(p < 1e−5)筛选代表不吃早餐的工具变量(iv)。采用Cochran’s Q检验、MR- egger拦截检验和MR PRESSO全局检验对IVs进行质量控制。反方差加权(IVW)作为评估因果关系的主要MR方法,而MR- egger、加权中位数和最大似然作为补充方法。在CARDIoGRAMplusC4D和FinnGen队列中评估不吃早餐对冠心病和心肌梗死的影响,并使用meta分析对结果进行整合。质量控制试验显示静脉注射无异质性或水平多效性。在严格的静脉筛查阈值下,对IVW方法的MR结果进行meta分析后发现,不吃早餐显著增加了冠心病[比值比(OR) = 1.358, p = 3.95E−02]和心肌梗死(OR = 1.449, p = 4.17E−02)的风险。同样,宽松IV筛查阈值下IVW结果的荟萃分析也显示,不吃早餐对冠心病(OR = 1.198, p = 5.55E−03)和心肌梗死(OR = 1.378, p = 4.08E−05)有不利影响。其他三种MR方法的结果与IVW相似(OR > 1)。总的来说,本研究表明不吃早餐会显著增加冠心病和心肌梗死的风险,因此,保持高质量的早餐摄入可以被认为是冠心病和心肌梗死必不可少的一级预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Science & Nutrition
Food Science & Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
434
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Science & Nutrition is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of food science and nutrition. The Journal will consider submissions of quality papers describing the results of fundamental and applied research related to all aspects of human food and nutrition, as well as interdisciplinary research that spans these two fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信