{"title":"Correction to “Leadership at the Threshold: MEANING, ETHICS, AND ADAPTATION IN THE AGE OF GENERATIVE AI”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jls.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Haskell, C. (2025). Leadership at the Threshold: <i>Meaning, Ethics, and Adaptation in the Age of Generative AI</i>. <i>Journal of Leadership Studies</i>, 19, e70012. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.70012</p><p>After the publication of the aforementioned article, the following errors were discovered and subsequently corrected as outlined below.</p><p>The sentence “This issue of the <i>Leadership & Organization Development Journal</i> does not treat that shift as neutral.” was incorrect. It has been corrected to “The current symposium does not treat that shift as neutral.”</p><p>In “Signals of the Current Climate,” the following sentence was incorrect: “We live in a climate that prizes performance over reflection—where power performs expertise, and those who challenge epistemic overreach, from women scholars to high-profile critics like Gary Marcus, are told they're rude, too dark, or depressing, while complexity is waved away as an inconvenience.”.</p><p>It has been revised to remove the term “women”: “We live in a climate that prizes performance over reflection—where power performs expertise, and those who challenge epistemic overreach, from scholars to high-profile critics like Gary Marcus, are told they are rude, too dark, or depressing, while complexity is waved away as an inconvenience.”.</p><p>The em dash was replaced with parentheses in the following sentences:</p><p>Their contributions (frameworks, case studies, and provocations) reclaim leadership as an act of care, critique, and cultural memory.</p><p>It identifies the interpretive layers (human, institutional, and algorithmic) that leaders must navigate.</p><p>The “Acknowledgments” section was missing and has now been included:</p>","PeriodicalId":45503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Leadership Studies","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jls.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Leadership Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jls.70020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Haskell, C. (2025). Leadership at the Threshold: Meaning, Ethics, and Adaptation in the Age of Generative AI. Journal of Leadership Studies, 19, e70012. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.70012
After the publication of the aforementioned article, the following errors were discovered and subsequently corrected as outlined below.
The sentence “This issue of the Leadership & Organization Development Journal does not treat that shift as neutral.” was incorrect. It has been corrected to “The current symposium does not treat that shift as neutral.”
In “Signals of the Current Climate,” the following sentence was incorrect: “We live in a climate that prizes performance over reflection—where power performs expertise, and those who challenge epistemic overreach, from women scholars to high-profile critics like Gary Marcus, are told they're rude, too dark, or depressing, while complexity is waved away as an inconvenience.”.
It has been revised to remove the term “women”: “We live in a climate that prizes performance over reflection—where power performs expertise, and those who challenge epistemic overreach, from scholars to high-profile critics like Gary Marcus, are told they are rude, too dark, or depressing, while complexity is waved away as an inconvenience.”.
The em dash was replaced with parentheses in the following sentences:
Their contributions (frameworks, case studies, and provocations) reclaim leadership as an act of care, critique, and cultural memory.
It identifies the interpretive layers (human, institutional, and algorithmic) that leaders must navigate.
The “Acknowledgments” section was missing and has now been included: