Clinical evaluation of prosthetic hand: A systematic review on existing methods, limitations and future directions

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Amlan Jyoti Kalita , Zahnupriya Kalita , Nayan M. Kakoty , Satyajit Borah
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of prosthetic hand: A systematic review on existing methods, limitations and future directions","authors":"Amlan Jyoti Kalita ,&nbsp;Zahnupriya Kalita ,&nbsp;Nayan M. Kakoty ,&nbsp;Satyajit Borah","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2025.104432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clinical testing of a prosthetic hand is a collaborative process between roboticists, prosthetists and researchers, aiming to produce the best possible functionality and comfort while satisfying the needs of users. Although many studies have reported on the existing state and future possibilities of prosthetic hands, few have studied the role of clinical testing in the development of prosthetic hands. This review aims to study existing literature on the clinical evaluation of prosthetic hands, present an overview of current clinical testing approaches, highlight their limitations, and outline potential future directions. A keyword-based search strategy was used to scan five electronic databases: DOAJ, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus and IEEE Xplore. This paper provides an overview of various clinical testing of research prototypes and their clinical efficacy. This manuscript detailed the current scenario of clinical testing and prosthetic hand assessment methods. The potential impact of prosthesis simulators on saving time and resources in clinical testing is highlighted. The trend of clinical testing from traditional to big data methods for more user-centric developments has been identified. Moreover, the limitations of existing clinical studies and the future direction of clinical testing are presented for further community research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453325001511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical testing of a prosthetic hand is a collaborative process between roboticists, prosthetists and researchers, aiming to produce the best possible functionality and comfort while satisfying the needs of users. Although many studies have reported on the existing state and future possibilities of prosthetic hands, few have studied the role of clinical testing in the development of prosthetic hands. This review aims to study existing literature on the clinical evaluation of prosthetic hands, present an overview of current clinical testing approaches, highlight their limitations, and outline potential future directions. A keyword-based search strategy was used to scan five electronic databases: DOAJ, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus and IEEE Xplore. This paper provides an overview of various clinical testing of research prototypes and their clinical efficacy. This manuscript detailed the current scenario of clinical testing and prosthetic hand assessment methods. The potential impact of prosthesis simulators on saving time and resources in clinical testing is highlighted. The trend of clinical testing from traditional to big data methods for more user-centric developments has been identified. Moreover, the limitations of existing clinical studies and the future direction of clinical testing are presented for further community research.
假手的临床评价:系统回顾现有方法、局限性及未来发展方向
假手的临床测试是机器人专家、假肢专家和研究人员之间的协作过程,旨在满足用户需求的同时,产生最佳的功能和舒适度。虽然许多研究报道了假手的现状和未来的可能性,但很少有研究研究临床测试在假手发展中的作用。本综述旨在研究现有的关于假肢手临床评估的文献,概述目前的临床测试方法,突出其局限性,并概述潜在的未来发展方向。采用基于关键词的搜索策略对DOAJ、Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus和IEEE Xplore 5个电子数据库进行了扫描。本文综述了各种研究原型的临床试验及其临床疗效。本文详细介绍了目前的临床测试情况和假手评估方法。强调了假肢模拟器在临床试验中节省时间和资源的潜在影响。临床检测从传统方法向以用户为中心的大数据方法发展的趋势已经确定。并对现有临床研究的局限性和临床试验的未来发展方向进行了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Engineering & Physics
Medical Engineering & Physics 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信