Differentiating cyclopropane fatty acids to support milk authenticity through GC–MS and NMR spectroscopy

IF 8.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Gian Marco Riccio , Dilek Eltemur , Federico Fava , Demian Martini-Lösch , Giovanni Peratoner , Elena Venir , Daniela Eisenstecken , Peter Robatscher , Matteo Scampicchio , Michael Oberhuber , Alberto Ceccon
{"title":"Differentiating cyclopropane fatty acids to support milk authenticity through GC–MS and NMR spectroscopy","authors":"Gian Marco Riccio ,&nbsp;Dilek Eltemur ,&nbsp;Federico Fava ,&nbsp;Demian Martini-Lösch ,&nbsp;Giovanni Peratoner ,&nbsp;Elena Venir ,&nbsp;Daniela Eisenstecken ,&nbsp;Peter Robatscher ,&nbsp;Matteo Scampicchio ,&nbsp;Michael Oberhuber ,&nbsp;Alberto Ceccon","doi":"10.1016/j.fochx.2025.103033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cyclopropane fatty acids (CPFAs), are emerging markers for food authentication in premium dairy products like <em>Parmigiano Reggiano</em> and <em>Haymilk</em>, where silage feeding is prohibited. This study focuses on two CPFAs—dihydrosterculic acid (DHSA) and lactobacillic acid (LBA)—in milk from cows fed diets with or without silage. Using both NMR spectroscopy and a refined GC–MS method, we quantified CPFAs and assessed their potential as dietary markers. NMR enabled rapid, non-destructive screening via <em>cis</em>-methylene proton signals, whereas GC–MS provided accurate quantification and separation of DHSA and LBA. DHSA levels were ∼ 3-fold higher in maize-silage-fed cows compared to non-silage-fed cows, making DHSA, or the DHSA/LBA ratio, robust markers of feeding regime. In contrast, LBA remained stable across diets and was unexpectedly detected in Haymilk, suggesting alternative metabolic origins. These results demonstrate the value of combining NMR and GC–MS for accurate CPFA quantification and provide new insights into their role in dairy authentication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12334,"journal":{"name":"Food Chemistry: X","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 103033"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Chemistry: X","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590157525008806","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cyclopropane fatty acids (CPFAs), are emerging markers for food authentication in premium dairy products like Parmigiano Reggiano and Haymilk, where silage feeding is prohibited. This study focuses on two CPFAs—dihydrosterculic acid (DHSA) and lactobacillic acid (LBA)—in milk from cows fed diets with or without silage. Using both NMR spectroscopy and a refined GC–MS method, we quantified CPFAs and assessed their potential as dietary markers. NMR enabled rapid, non-destructive screening via cis-methylene proton signals, whereas GC–MS provided accurate quantification and separation of DHSA and LBA. DHSA levels were ∼ 3-fold higher in maize-silage-fed cows compared to non-silage-fed cows, making DHSA, or the DHSA/LBA ratio, robust markers of feeding regime. In contrast, LBA remained stable across diets and was unexpectedly detected in Haymilk, suggesting alternative metabolic origins. These results demonstrate the value of combining NMR and GC–MS for accurate CPFA quantification and provide new insights into their role in dairy authentication.

Abstract Image

通过气相色谱-质谱和核磁共振光谱鉴别环丙烷脂肪酸以支持牛奶的真实性
环丙烷脂肪酸(CPFAs)是高级乳制品(如禁止青贮饲料的Parmigiano Reggiano和Haymilk)中食品认证的新兴标志。本研究主要研究饲喂或不饲喂青贮饲料的奶牛牛奶中的两种cpfa——双氢甾酸(DHSA)和乳酸杆菌酸(LBA)。利用核磁共振波谱和改进的气相色谱-质谱方法,我们对CPFAs进行了量化,并评估了它们作为膳食标志物的潜力。核磁共振可以通过顺式亚甲基质子信号进行快速、无损的筛选,而气相色谱-质谱可以精确地定量和分离DHSA和LBA。与非青贮奶牛相比,玉米青贮奶牛的DHSA水平高出约3倍,这使得DHSA或DHSA/LBA比率成为饲喂方式的有力标志。相比之下,LBA在饮食中保持稳定,并且意外地在Haymilk中检测到,这表明有其他代谢起源。这些结果证明了结合NMR和GC-MS对CPFA精确定量的价值,并为它们在乳制品认证中的作用提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Chemistry: X
Food Chemistry: X CHEMISTRY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
315
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Food Chemistry: X, one of three Open Access companion journals to Food Chemistry, follows the same aims, scope, and peer-review process. It focuses on papers advancing food and biochemistry or analytical methods, prioritizing research novelty. Manuscript evaluation considers novelty, scientific rigor, field advancement, and reader interest. Excluded are studies on food molecular sciences or disease cure/prevention. Topics include food component chemistry, bioactives, processing effects, additives, contaminants, and analytical methods. The journal welcome Analytical Papers addressing food microbiology, sensory aspects, and more, emphasizing new methods with robust validation and applicability to diverse foods or regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信