Integrating social vulnerability into food fraud vulnerability assessment: policy implications for authenticity in Spanish honey

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Claudia Coral, Dagmar Mithöfer
{"title":"Integrating social vulnerability into food fraud vulnerability assessment: policy implications for authenticity in Spanish honey","authors":"Claudia Coral,&nbsp;Dagmar Mithöfer","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cooperation on food fraud in the EU has become more structured since the establishment of the EU Food Fraud Network in 2013, with honey at the centre of recent regulatory changes regarding labelling and control measures. Despite progress, social vulnerability considerations have been largely overlooked in existing policy and academic discussions. Through narrative analysis of interviews with experts and actors from the Spanish honey value chain and European institutions, we explore nested layers of food fraud vulnerability: product and supply chain-related food fraud vulnerabilities, social vulnerabilities, institutional vulnerabilities, and vulnerabilities related to international trade and market dynamics. Particular emphasis is placed on understanding how these dynamics affect vulnerable actors and limit their ability to respond to fraud. In a sector dominated by small and medium-sized beekeepers, food fraud poses a major threat to the viability of beekeeping. Key vulnerabilities include regulatory gaps, inconsistent detection methods, and global trade pressures that disproportionately affect vulnerable value chain actors. In particular, we highlight social vulnerability factors like low participation in decision-making, and unequal distribution of fraud-related risks and responsibilities throughout the value chain, which undermine trust between actors. Beekeepers and their associations advocate for geographical indication (GI) schemes, direct trade, and short supply chains to reduce fraud risks, address power imbalances, and improve traceability and authenticity. This research highlights the need for regulatory frameworks that promote equity, transparency, and fair risk sharing. It contributes to embedding social vulnerability into food fraud vulnerability concepts and advocates for socially responsible governance that prioritizes the rights and resilience of all actors within the agri-food system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 102954"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225001599","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cooperation on food fraud in the EU has become more structured since the establishment of the EU Food Fraud Network in 2013, with honey at the centre of recent regulatory changes regarding labelling and control measures. Despite progress, social vulnerability considerations have been largely overlooked in existing policy and academic discussions. Through narrative analysis of interviews with experts and actors from the Spanish honey value chain and European institutions, we explore nested layers of food fraud vulnerability: product and supply chain-related food fraud vulnerabilities, social vulnerabilities, institutional vulnerabilities, and vulnerabilities related to international trade and market dynamics. Particular emphasis is placed on understanding how these dynamics affect vulnerable actors and limit their ability to respond to fraud. In a sector dominated by small and medium-sized beekeepers, food fraud poses a major threat to the viability of beekeeping. Key vulnerabilities include regulatory gaps, inconsistent detection methods, and global trade pressures that disproportionately affect vulnerable value chain actors. In particular, we highlight social vulnerability factors like low participation in decision-making, and unequal distribution of fraud-related risks and responsibilities throughout the value chain, which undermine trust between actors. Beekeepers and their associations advocate for geographical indication (GI) schemes, direct trade, and short supply chains to reduce fraud risks, address power imbalances, and improve traceability and authenticity. This research highlights the need for regulatory frameworks that promote equity, transparency, and fair risk sharing. It contributes to embedding social vulnerability into food fraud vulnerability concepts and advocates for socially responsible governance that prioritizes the rights and resilience of all actors within the agri-food system.
将社会脆弱性纳入食品欺诈脆弱性评估:西班牙蜂蜜真实性的政策含义
自2013年欧盟食品欺诈网络成立以来,欧盟在食品欺诈方面的合作变得更加结构化,蜂蜜是最近关于标签和控制措施的监管变化的中心。尽管取得了进展,但在现有政策和学术讨论中,社会脆弱性的考虑在很大程度上被忽视了。通过对来自西班牙蜂蜜价值链和欧洲机构的专家和参与者的访谈进行叙事分析,我们探索了食品欺诈脆弱性的嵌套层:与产品和供应链相关的食品欺诈脆弱性,社会脆弱性,制度脆弱性以及与国际贸易和市场动态相关的脆弱性。特别强调的是了解这些动态如何影响弱势行为者并限制他们应对欺诈的能力。在一个以中小型养蜂人为主的行业,食品欺诈对养蜂业的生存能力构成了重大威胁。主要的脆弱性包括监管漏洞、检测方法不一致以及全球贸易压力,这些都对脆弱的价值链参与者造成了不成比例的影响。我们特别强调了社会脆弱性因素,如决策参与度低、欺诈相关风险和责任在整个价值链中的不平等分配,这些因素会破坏行为体之间的信任。养蜂人及其协会倡导地理标志(GI)计划、直接贸易和短供应链,以减少欺诈风险、解决权力不平衡问题,并提高可追溯性和真实性。这项研究强调了建立促进公平、透明和公平分担风险的监管框架的必要性。它有助于将社会脆弱性纳入食品欺诈脆弱性概念,并倡导社会负责任的治理,优先考虑农业粮食系统内所有行为者的权利和抵御能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信