Oral placement tests at an English language school: ‘Fifth position post-expansions’ creating affordances for additional displays of interactional competence and other beneficial activities

IF 2.1 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Christopher Leyland , Katherina Walper
{"title":"Oral placement tests at an English language school: ‘Fifth position post-expansions’ creating affordances for additional displays of interactional competence and other beneficial activities","authors":"Christopher Leyland ,&nbsp;Katherina Walper","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2025.101420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although Oral Placement Tests (OPTs) are widely taken by second language (L2) students entering a new institution, they have attracted little empirical attention. The current study shares findings from a Conversation Analytic investigation into 26 OPTs that took place at a UK-based English language school. In these tests, participants display orientations to different forms of institutionality. Through a four positioned base sequence (Initiation-Response-Feedback+Writing), participants display a <em>test-task orientation</em> to discuss set topics and complete a test-sheet. At this juncture, the examiner can initiate a new base sequence and progress the test. Alternatively, participants can display a <em>contingent topic development orientation</em> by halting this progression and initiating what we term a ‘fifth position post-expansion sequence’. While these do not inform what the examiner writes under each topic of the test-sheet, they develop the talk and serve several other institutional functions designed to enhance test-takers’ experience at the language school. Importantly, these expansions also create opportunities for additional displays of L2 Interactional Competence (L2 IC). This study adds to existing research on the benefits of post-expansion sequences and the L2 IC affordances of an under-researched testing format. It also reveals how OPTs are a flexible L2 assessment format in which test-takers or examiners can break from the restrictive question-answer structure of other formats and develop the talk in an authentic manner. The paper reveals specific methods that test-takers (of various levels) and examiners use to expand beyond simple question-answer sequences, which can inform teaching and assessor training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 101420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589825000385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although Oral Placement Tests (OPTs) are widely taken by second language (L2) students entering a new institution, they have attracted little empirical attention. The current study shares findings from a Conversation Analytic investigation into 26 OPTs that took place at a UK-based English language school. In these tests, participants display orientations to different forms of institutionality. Through a four positioned base sequence (Initiation-Response-Feedback+Writing), participants display a test-task orientation to discuss set topics and complete a test-sheet. At this juncture, the examiner can initiate a new base sequence and progress the test. Alternatively, participants can display a contingent topic development orientation by halting this progression and initiating what we term a ‘fifth position post-expansion sequence’. While these do not inform what the examiner writes under each topic of the test-sheet, they develop the talk and serve several other institutional functions designed to enhance test-takers’ experience at the language school. Importantly, these expansions also create opportunities for additional displays of L2 Interactional Competence (L2 IC). This study adds to existing research on the benefits of post-expansion sequences and the L2 IC affordances of an under-researched testing format. It also reveals how OPTs are a flexible L2 assessment format in which test-takers or examiners can break from the restrictive question-answer structure of other formats and develop the talk in an authentic manner. The paper reveals specific methods that test-takers (of various levels) and examiners use to expand beyond simple question-answer sequences, which can inform teaching and assessor training.
一所英语语言学校的口语分班考试:“扩展后的第五名”,为额外展示互动能力和其他有益的活动创造了条件
虽然口语分班考试(OPTs)在第二语言(L2)学生进入新机构时被广泛采用,但它们很少引起实证关注。目前的研究分享了Conversation Analytic对26名opt的调查结果,该调查在英国一所英语语言学校进行。在这些测试中,参与者表现出对不同形式制度的倾向。通过四个定位的基本序列(发起-响应-反馈+写作),参与者展示了一个测试任务的方向,讨论设定的主题并完成一个测试表。在这个关键时刻,审查员可以启动一个新的碱基序列并进行测试。或者,参与者可以通过停止这一进程并启动我们所说的“第五个位置后扩展序列”来显示偶然的主题发展方向。虽然这些材料并不会告诉考官在试卷的每个题目下写了什么,但它们会发展谈话内容,并起到其他几个制度性的作用,旨在增强考生在语言学校的体验。重要的是,这些扩展也为L2互动能力(L2 IC)的额外展示创造了机会。这项研究增加了对扩展后序列的好处和研究不足的测试格式的L2 IC可视性的现有研究。它还揭示了opt是一种灵活的第二语言评估格式,考生或考官可以从其他格式的限制性问答结构中解脱出来,以真实的方式展开谈话。本文揭示了(不同水平的)考生和考官使用的特定方法来扩展简单的问答序列,这可以为教学和评估人员培训提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信