Roller Milling and Stone Milling: Effect on Soft Wheat Flour, Dough, and Bread Properties

IF 2.8 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Junyang Li, Luigi Moriconi, Giulia Falistocco, Xinying Suo, Antonella Petrini, Laura Righetti, Chiara Dall’Asta, Massimiliano Cuccioloni, Anna Maria Eleuteri and Elena Vittadini*, 
{"title":"Roller Milling and Stone Milling: Effect on Soft Wheat Flour, Dough, and Bread Properties","authors":"Junyang Li,&nbsp;Luigi Moriconi,&nbsp;Giulia Falistocco,&nbsp;Xinying Suo,&nbsp;Antonella Petrini,&nbsp;Laura Righetti,&nbsp;Chiara Dall’Asta,&nbsp;Massimiliano Cuccioloni,&nbsp;Anna Maria Eleuteri and Elena Vittadini*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsfoodscitech.5c00475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Roller milling (RM) and stone milling (SM) are the two most common methods used in the food industry. Although these techniques have been extensively explored individually, comparative data on wholegrain wheat products produced from the same wheat sample are limited. Since SM and RM can generate different forces and temperatures during processing, these conditions could affect the technological quality of the flour, and consequently, the properties of the dough and the bread. In this study, these effects were investigated by comparing flour particle size, ash content, damaged starch, falling number and alkylresorcinol content, dough farinograph and alveograph parameters, and bread physical properties. Wholegrain flours were produced from a single-variety wheat commercial lot by a group of roller and stone mills, and used to produce breads using home bread-making machines. Overall, the type of milling had little effect on the properties of flours, bread doughs, and breads. Nevertheless, flours from SM had fewer fine fractions (&lt;125 μm) and higher alkylresorcinol content. Regardless of milling type, significant differences among individual mills were found for all properties except flour baking strength, gluten index, and alkylresorcinol content, indicating that inherent mill characteristics contribute to observed variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":72048,"journal":{"name":"ACS food science & technology","volume":"5 9","pages":"3440–3449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.5c00475","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS food science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.5c00475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Roller milling (RM) and stone milling (SM) are the two most common methods used in the food industry. Although these techniques have been extensively explored individually, comparative data on wholegrain wheat products produced from the same wheat sample are limited. Since SM and RM can generate different forces and temperatures during processing, these conditions could affect the technological quality of the flour, and consequently, the properties of the dough and the bread. In this study, these effects were investigated by comparing flour particle size, ash content, damaged starch, falling number and alkylresorcinol content, dough farinograph and alveograph parameters, and bread physical properties. Wholegrain flours were produced from a single-variety wheat commercial lot by a group of roller and stone mills, and used to produce breads using home bread-making machines. Overall, the type of milling had little effect on the properties of flours, bread doughs, and breads. Nevertheless, flours from SM had fewer fine fractions (<125 μm) and higher alkylresorcinol content. Regardless of milling type, significant differences among individual mills were found for all properties except flour baking strength, gluten index, and alkylresorcinol content, indicating that inherent mill characteristics contribute to observed variability.

辊磨和石磨:对软面粉、面团和面包性能的影响
辊磨(RM)和石磨(SM)是食品工业中最常用的两种方法。尽管这些技术已被广泛地单独探索,但从同一小麦样品中生产的全麦小麦产品的比较数据有限。由于SM和RM在加工过程中会产生不同的力和温度,这些条件会影响面粉的工艺质量,从而影响面团和面包的性质。在这项研究中,通过比较面粉粒度、灰分含量、受损淀粉、落粒数和烷基间苯二酚含量、面团面粉谱和alveograph参数以及面包的物理性能来研究这些影响。全谷物面粉是由一组辊磨和石磨从单一品种的商业小麦中生产出来的,并使用家用面包机生产面包。总的来说,研磨类型对面粉、面包团和面包的性质影响不大。然而,SM粉的细粒(125 μm)较少,烷基间苯二酚含量较高。除了面粉的烘烤强度、面筋指数和烷基间苯二酚含量外,不同磨粉机之间的所有性能都存在显著差异,这表明磨粉机的固有特性导致了观察到的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信