Surprise at Work: An Integrative Review of Engineering Surprises (Not Just Reacting to Them)

IF 31.1 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Spencer H. Harrison, Gabriel R. Sala, Jean M. Bartunek, Boram Do
{"title":"Surprise at Work: An Integrative Review of Engineering Surprises (Not Just Reacting to Them)","authors":"Spencer H. Harrison, Gabriel R. Sala, Jean M. Bartunek, Boram Do","doi":"10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110622-044243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations rely on roles, routines, and other mechanisms to build systems of shared expectations. By definition, surprises occur when expectations are violated. Hence, surprise is inevitable in organizations and important because the experience of surprise threatens to undo the expectations that make organizations feel predictable and therefore workable. Reacting to surprises can therefore feel unpredictable and threatening. Indeed, surprises can be seen as offering evidence of poor planning and bad management. However, in this review, we integrate literature on surprise that offers a contrasting perspective: that individuals in organizations do not just react to and experience surprises but also proactively engineer them. Our review explores who engineers surprises, why they choose to do so, how they structure situations to create surprises, what happens as individuals and collectives deal with the emotional impact of surprises, and what happens next as individuals and collectives either learn from or dismiss surprises. Our review provides an important corrective to research that focuses exclusively on surprises as negative events in organizational life and offers questions for future research that provide an agenda for developing theory on engineering surprise.","PeriodicalId":48019,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":31.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110622-044243","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizations rely on roles, routines, and other mechanisms to build systems of shared expectations. By definition, surprises occur when expectations are violated. Hence, surprise is inevitable in organizations and important because the experience of surprise threatens to undo the expectations that make organizations feel predictable and therefore workable. Reacting to surprises can therefore feel unpredictable and threatening. Indeed, surprises can be seen as offering evidence of poor planning and bad management. However, in this review, we integrate literature on surprise that offers a contrasting perspective: that individuals in organizations do not just react to and experience surprises but also proactively engineer them. Our review explores who engineers surprises, why they choose to do so, how they structure situations to create surprises, what happens as individuals and collectives deal with the emotional impact of surprises, and what happens next as individuals and collectives either learn from or dismiss surprises. Our review provides an important corrective to research that focuses exclusively on surprises as negative events in organizational life and offers questions for future research that provide an agenda for developing theory on engineering surprise.
工作中的意外:工程意外的综合回顾(不只是对它们做出反应)
组织依靠角色、例程和其他机制来构建共享期望的系统。根据定义,当期望被打破时,惊喜就会出现。因此,意外在组织中是不可避免的,而且很重要,因为意外的经历可能会破坏使组织感觉可预测并因此可行的期望。因此,对意外的反应会让人感到不可预测和威胁。事实上,意外可以被视为计划不周和管理不善的证据。然而,在这篇综述中,我们整合了关于惊喜的文献,提供了一个对比的视角:组织中的个人不仅对惊喜做出反应和体验,而且还积极地设计它们。我们的回顾探讨了是谁创造了惊喜,他们为什么选择这样做,他们如何组织情境来创造惊喜,当个人和集体处理惊喜的情感影响时会发生什么,以及当个人和集体从惊喜中学习或忽视惊喜时接下来会发生什么。我们的综述为专门将意外作为组织生活中的负面事件的研究提供了一个重要的纠正,并为未来的研究提供了一个发展工程意外理论的议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Launched in March 2014, the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior is a publication dedicated to reviewing the literature on I/O Psychology and HRM/OB. In the latest edition of the Journal Citation Report (JCR) in 2023, this journal achieved significant recognition. It ranked among the top 5 journals in two categories and boasted an impressive Impact Factor of 13.7.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信