Domestic cooking and food behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic and the cost-of-living crisis: A scoping review

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Michèle Renard , Zoë Bell , Mahrokh Jamshidvand , Zhixin Mai , Amanda McCloat , Elaine Mooney , Lynsey Hollywood , Fiona Lavelle
{"title":"Domestic cooking and food behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic and the cost-of-living crisis: A scoping review","authors":"Michèle Renard ,&nbsp;Zoë Bell ,&nbsp;Mahrokh Jamshidvand ,&nbsp;Zhixin Mai ,&nbsp;Amanda McCloat ,&nbsp;Elaine Mooney ,&nbsp;Lynsey Hollywood ,&nbsp;Fiona Lavelle","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This scoping review examined how the COVID-19 pandemic and cost-of-living crisis have influenced domestic cooking and food-related behaviours. Following PRISMA-ScR, a systematic search across five databases and grey literature sources identified 4955 records. After screening, 98 studies published between 2020 and 2024 were included. Most studies were conducted in the UK (22.4 %) and USA (18.4 %) and employed cross-sectional (94.9 %) and quantitative (73.5 %) methods. The review identified widespread increases in home cooking, with 50–78 % of participants reporting greater cooking frequency. Changes in food shopping were also prominent, including reduced in-person visits (reported by 40–74 % of participants) and increased online grocery use (25–61.8 %). Budgeting behaviours adapted to financial constraints, with many households reducing the quality and quantity of food purchased, substituting fresh with shelf-stable options. Improvements in hand hygiene were widely reported (74–90 %); however, unsafe practices such as consuming expired foods or mishandling leftovers, remained common. Only 4.1 % of studies received a positive quality rating, with frequent use of non-validated tools and self-reported measures. Future research should employ longitudinal designs to assess the sustainability of these behaviours. Structural policy actions are needed to ensure access to affordable, nutritious foods and support sustainable food practices during ongoing economic challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 108311"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325004647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scoping review examined how the COVID-19 pandemic and cost-of-living crisis have influenced domestic cooking and food-related behaviours. Following PRISMA-ScR, a systematic search across five databases and grey literature sources identified 4955 records. After screening, 98 studies published between 2020 and 2024 were included. Most studies were conducted in the UK (22.4 %) and USA (18.4 %) and employed cross-sectional (94.9 %) and quantitative (73.5 %) methods. The review identified widespread increases in home cooking, with 50–78 % of participants reporting greater cooking frequency. Changes in food shopping were also prominent, including reduced in-person visits (reported by 40–74 % of participants) and increased online grocery use (25–61.8 %). Budgeting behaviours adapted to financial constraints, with many households reducing the quality and quantity of food purchased, substituting fresh with shelf-stable options. Improvements in hand hygiene were widely reported (74–90 %); however, unsafe practices such as consuming expired foods or mishandling leftovers, remained common. Only 4.1 % of studies received a positive quality rating, with frequent use of non-validated tools and self-reported measures. Future research should employ longitudinal designs to assess the sustainability of these behaviours. Structural policy actions are needed to ensure access to affordable, nutritious foods and support sustainable food practices during ongoing economic challenges.

Abstract Image

2019冠状病毒病大流行和生活成本危机期间的家庭烹饪和食物行为:范围审查。
本次范围审查审查了2019冠状病毒病大流行和生活成本危机如何影响家庭烹饪和与食物相关的行为。在prism - scr之后,系统地搜索了五个数据库和灰色文献来源,确定了4,995条记录。筛选后,纳入了2020年至2024年间发表的98项研究。大多数研究在英国(22.4%)和美国(18.4%)进行,采用横断面(94.9%)和定量(73.5%)方法。调查发现,在家做饭的人数普遍增加,50-78%的参与者报告自己做饭的频率增加了。食品购物的变化也很突出,包括亲自访问的减少(40% -74%的参与者报告)和在线杂货使用的增加(25% -61.8%)。预算行为适应了财务约束,许多家庭降低了购买食品的质量和数量,用货架稳定的食品替代新鲜食品。广泛报告了手部卫生的改善(74-90%);然而,不安全的做法,如食用过期食品或不当处理剩菜,仍然很常见。只有4.1%的研究获得了积极的质量评价,频繁使用未经验证的工具和自我报告的测量方法。未来的研究应该采用纵向设计来评估这些行为的可持续性。需要采取结构性政策行动,确保人们获得负担得起的营养食品,并在当前的经济挑战中支持可持续的粮食做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信