How Childhood Maltreatment Predicts Prosocial Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Rui Yuan,Lei Yang,Meixi Liu,Yuying Xie,Yiting Jiang
{"title":"How Childhood Maltreatment Predicts Prosocial Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rui Yuan,Lei Yang,Meixi Liu,Yuying Xie,Yiting Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s10964-025-02257-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Childhood maltreatment is closely related to prosocial behaviors, which usually emerges from early childhood to early adolescence. There has been, however, no agreement on the results regarding the individual and joint effects of maltreatment subtypes. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between maltreatment subtypes and prosocial behaviors. A total of 29 studies with 30 independent samples and 81 independent effect sizes are included in this meta-analysis (n = 58,047; 55.61% female). The results indicate a significant but modest negative association between childhood maltreatment and prosocial behaviors (r = -0.127; z = 4.51, p < 0.001). Among other things, neglect shows the largest effect size (r = -0.130; z = 3.36, p < 0.01). Multiple subtypes of childhood maltreatment displays a larger effect size (r = -0.138; z = 4.29, p < 0.001) than any single subtype of childhood maltreatment. Overall, by clarifying the differential negative associations of single maltreatment subtypes and the stronger negative effects of multiple subtypes, this study moves beyond the either-or debates between the altruism inhibition assumption and the altruism born of suffering assumption. It thereby provides nuanced evidence that avoids aligning with either extreme position. These findings highlight the importance of targeted interventions, such as addressing neglect specifically or responding to multiple maltreatment subtypes comprehensively, in promoting empathy and fostering posttraumatic growth to facilitate moral development in adolescence.","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02257-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Childhood maltreatment is closely related to prosocial behaviors, which usually emerges from early childhood to early adolescence. There has been, however, no agreement on the results regarding the individual and joint effects of maltreatment subtypes. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between maltreatment subtypes and prosocial behaviors. A total of 29 studies with 30 independent samples and 81 independent effect sizes are included in this meta-analysis (n = 58,047; 55.61% female). The results indicate a significant but modest negative association between childhood maltreatment and prosocial behaviors (r = -0.127; z = 4.51, p < 0.001). Among other things, neglect shows the largest effect size (r = -0.130; z = 3.36, p < 0.01). Multiple subtypes of childhood maltreatment displays a larger effect size (r = -0.138; z = 4.29, p < 0.001) than any single subtype of childhood maltreatment. Overall, by clarifying the differential negative associations of single maltreatment subtypes and the stronger negative effects of multiple subtypes, this study moves beyond the either-or debates between the altruism inhibition assumption and the altruism born of suffering assumption. It thereby provides nuanced evidence that avoids aligning with either extreme position. These findings highlight the importance of targeted interventions, such as addressing neglect specifically or responding to multiple maltreatment subtypes comprehensively, in promoting empathy and fostering posttraumatic growth to facilitate moral development in adolescence.
儿童虐待如何预测亲社会行为:系统回顾与元分析。
儿童虐待与亲社会行为密切相关,通常出现在儿童早期到青少年早期。然而,关于虐待亚型的个体和联合影响的结果尚未达成一致。本研究旨在通过系统回顾和meta分析来评估虐待亚型与亲社会行为之间的关系。本meta分析共纳入29项研究,30个独立样本,81个独立效应量(n = 58,047,女性55.61%)。结果表明,儿童虐待与亲社会行为之间存在显著但适度的负相关(r = -0.127; z = 4.51, p < 0.001)。在其他因素中,忽视显示出最大的效应大小(r = -0.130; z = 3.36, p < 0.01)。儿童虐待的多个亚型比任何单一亚型的儿童虐待表现出更大的效应量(r = -0.138; z = 4.29, p < 0.001)。总的来说,通过澄清单一虐待亚型的不同负面关联和多种亚型的更强负面影响,本研究超越了利他主义抑制假设和利他主义源于痛苦假设之间的非此此彼的争论。因此,它提供了微妙的证据,避免与任何一个极端立场一致。这些发现强调了有针对性的干预措施的重要性,例如具体解决忽视问题或全面应对多种虐待亚型,以促进移情和促进创伤后成长,以促进青少年的道德发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Journal of Youth and Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信