Overview of Challenges in Brain-based Predictive Modeling: Towards meaningful predictive insights.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Vera Komeyer, Nicolas Nieto, Simon B Eickhoff, Federico Raimondo, Kaustubh R Patil
{"title":"Overview of Challenges in Brain-based Predictive Modeling: Towards meaningful predictive insights.","authors":"Vera Komeyer, Nicolas Nieto, Simon B Eickhoff, Federico Raimondo, Kaustubh R Patil","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predictive analytics based on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence is a powerful tool enabling precision psychiatry and providing insights into brain-behavior relationships. However, given the mixed results observed in the field so far, making meaningful progress requires careful consideration of several key challenges to ensure the validity of models and findings, including overfitting, confounding biases, site effect harmonization, and interpretability, among others. First, we highlight limitations of cross-validation (CV), a ubiquitous ML strategy used to prevent overfitting and obtain generalization estimates, emphasizing the risk of performance inflation and the need for independent validation. Next, we introduce different types of so-called 3<sup>rd</sup> variables that can influence the examination of a brain-behavioral relationship of interest in different ways, using causal inference principles. We emphasize the biasing impact of confounding variables on ML models and summarize common mitigation strategies. We then discuss site-specific effects in multi-site datasets, reviewing different harmonization strategies to reduce unwanted variability and site-specific noise. Finally, we explore post-hoc model interpretation methods to enhance model transparency while cautioning against misinterpretation. By integrating rigorous result validation, confounder control, and interpretability techniques, researchers can ensure that ML models produce more reliable and generalizable findings avoiding spurious associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.09.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predictive analytics based on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence is a powerful tool enabling precision psychiatry and providing insights into brain-behavior relationships. However, given the mixed results observed in the field so far, making meaningful progress requires careful consideration of several key challenges to ensure the validity of models and findings, including overfitting, confounding biases, site effect harmonization, and interpretability, among others. First, we highlight limitations of cross-validation (CV), a ubiquitous ML strategy used to prevent overfitting and obtain generalization estimates, emphasizing the risk of performance inflation and the need for independent validation. Next, we introduce different types of so-called 3rd variables that can influence the examination of a brain-behavioral relationship of interest in different ways, using causal inference principles. We emphasize the biasing impact of confounding variables on ML models and summarize common mitigation strategies. We then discuss site-specific effects in multi-site datasets, reviewing different harmonization strategies to reduce unwanted variability and site-specific noise. Finally, we explore post-hoc model interpretation methods to enhance model transparency while cautioning against misinterpretation. By integrating rigorous result validation, confounder control, and interpretability techniques, researchers can ensure that ML models produce more reliable and generalizable findings avoiding spurious associations.

基于大脑的预测建模挑战概述:迈向有意义的预测见解。
基于机器学习(ML)和人工智能的预测分析是一种强大的工具,可以实现精确精神病学,并提供对大脑行为关系的见解。然而,鉴于到目前为止在该领域观察到的混合结果,要取得有意义的进展,需要仔细考虑几个关键挑战,以确保模型和发现的有效性,包括过拟合、混淆偏差、场地效应协调和可解释性等。首先,我们强调了交叉验证(CV)的局限性,交叉验证是一种普遍存在的ML策略,用于防止过拟合并获得泛化估计,强调了性能膨胀的风险和独立验证的必要性。接下来,我们介绍了不同类型的所谓第三变量,这些变量可以使用因果推理原则,以不同的方式影响对感兴趣的大脑-行为关系的检查。我们强调混淆变量对ML模型的偏倚影响,并总结了常见的缓解策略。然后,我们讨论了多站点数据集的站点特定效应,回顾了不同的协调策略,以减少不必要的变异性和站点特定噪声。最后,我们探讨了事后模型解释方法,以提高模型透明度,同时防止误解。通过整合严格的结果验证、混杂控制和可解释性技术,研究人员可以确保ML模型产生更可靠和可推广的发现,避免虚假的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychiatry
Biological Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
1398
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信