Comparison of Methods for the Preparation of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters for the Analysis of Omega-3 Rich Oils by Gas Chromatography

IF 2.4 4区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Tharani T. Dissanayake, Shona Crawford-Clark, Benjamin J. Bowen, Luke C. Henderson, Colin J. Barrow, Jacqui L. Adcock
{"title":"Comparison of Methods for the Preparation of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters for the Analysis of Omega-3 Rich Oils by Gas Chromatography","authors":"Tharani T. Dissanayake,&nbsp;Shona Crawford-Clark,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Bowen,&nbsp;Luke C. Henderson,&nbsp;Colin J. Barrow,&nbsp;Jacqui L. Adcock","doi":"10.1002/aocs.12974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fatty acid analysis is required in a wide range of industries, and conversion to fatty acid methyl esters followed by gas chromatography is by far the most common method of analysis. However, despite widespread use, there is no consensus on which derivatization method should be used or how the methods compare. In this work, five methods for the preparation of fatty acid methyl esters were compared for the analysis of three omega-3 rich oils (marine, krill, and flaxseed oils). Overall, we found that all methods gave similar results for percentage composition of fatty acids, but some variation existed when comparing absolute quantitation of fatty acids. We also found that the derivatization efficacy of each method varied depending on lipid class, with catalyst type having a significant effect. Two methods employing: (i) methanolic hydrogen chloride and (ii) methanolic sodium hydroxide followed by a boron trihalide reagent (BCl<sub>3</sub> or BF<sub>3</sub>) had derivatizing efficacies (by lipid class) that were significantly higher than for the other methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":17182,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society","volume":"102 9","pages":"1351-1361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aocs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aocs.12974","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://aocs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aocs.12974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fatty acid analysis is required in a wide range of industries, and conversion to fatty acid methyl esters followed by gas chromatography is by far the most common method of analysis. However, despite widespread use, there is no consensus on which derivatization method should be used or how the methods compare. In this work, five methods for the preparation of fatty acid methyl esters were compared for the analysis of three omega-3 rich oils (marine, krill, and flaxseed oils). Overall, we found that all methods gave similar results for percentage composition of fatty acids, but some variation existed when comparing absolute quantitation of fatty acids. We also found that the derivatization efficacy of each method varied depending on lipid class, with catalyst type having a significant effect. Two methods employing: (i) methanolic hydrogen chloride and (ii) methanolic sodium hydroxide followed by a boron trihalide reagent (BCl3 or BF3) had derivatizing efficacies (by lipid class) that were significantly higher than for the other methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

气相色谱法分析富欧米茄-3油中脂肪酸甲酯制备方法的比较
脂肪酸分析需要在广泛的行业,转化为脂肪酸甲酯随后气相色谱是迄今为止最常见的分析方法。然而,尽管广泛使用,但对于应该使用哪种衍生化方法或如何比较这些方法尚无共识。在这项工作中,比较了五种制备脂肪酸甲酯的方法,用于分析三种富含omega-3的油(海洋油、磷虾油和亚麻籽油)。总的来说,我们发现所有方法对脂肪酸组成百分比的结果相似,但在比较脂肪酸的绝对定量时存在一些差异。我们还发现,每种方法的衍生化效果因脂类而异,催化剂类型有显著影响。采用(i)甲醇氯化氢和(ii)甲醇氢氧化钠和三卤化硼试剂(BCl3或BF3)的两种方法的衍生化效率(按脂类划分)明显高于其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society (JAOCS) is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes significant original scientific research and technological advances on fats, oils, oilseed proteins, and related materials through original research articles, invited reviews, short communications, and letters to the editor. We seek to publish reports that will significantly advance scientific understanding through hypothesis driven research, innovations, and important new information pertaining to analysis, properties, processing, products, and applications of these food and industrial resources. Breakthroughs in food science and technology, biotechnology (including genomics, biomechanisms, biocatalysis and bioprocessing), and industrial products and applications are particularly appropriate. JAOCS also considers reports on the lipid composition of new, unique, and traditional sources of lipids that definitively address a research hypothesis and advances scientific understanding. However, the genus and species of the source must be verified by appropriate means of classification. In addition, the GPS location of the harvested materials and seed or vegetative samples should be deposited in an accredited germplasm repository. Compositional data suitable for Original Research Articles must embody replicated estimate of tissue constituents, such as oil, protein, carbohydrate, fatty acid, phospholipid, tocopherol, sterol, and carotenoid compositions. Other components unique to the specific plant or animal source may be reported. Furthermore, lipid composition papers should incorporate elements of year­to­year, environmental, and/ or cultivar variations through use of appropriate statistical analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信