Securing the Future of NMR Metabolomics Reproducibility: A Call for Standardized Reporting

IF 6.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Erik R. Andersson*, , , Amanda L. Bayless*, , , Robert B. Brua, , , Fabio Casu, , , Leo L. Cheng, , , Munki Choo, , , Arthur S. Edison, , , Hamid R. Eghbalnia, , , Candace C. Fleischer, , , Goncalo J. Gouveia, , , Jeffrey C. Hoch, , , Gagandeep Kaur, , , Da-Wei Li, , , Wimal Pathmasiri, , , István Pelczer, , , Fay Probert, , , Daniel Raftery, , , David Rovnyak, , , Michael Secreto, , , Tracey B. Schock, , , Panteleimon G. Takis, , , Mario Uchimiya, , , David S. Wishart, , , Ali Yılmaz, , , Lloyd W. Sumner, , , Robert Powers, , , Valérie Copié, , and , Teklab Gebregiworgis*, 
{"title":"Securing the Future of NMR Metabolomics Reproducibility: A Call for Standardized Reporting","authors":"Erik R. Andersson*,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Amanda L. Bayless*,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Robert B. Brua,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Fabio Casu,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Leo L. Cheng,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Munki Choo,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Arthur S. Edison,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Hamid R. Eghbalnia,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Candace C. Fleischer,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Goncalo J. Gouveia,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Jeffrey C. Hoch,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Gagandeep Kaur,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Da-Wei Li,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Wimal Pathmasiri,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;István Pelczer,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Fay Probert,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Daniel Raftery,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;David Rovnyak,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Michael Secreto,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Tracey B. Schock,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Panteleimon G. Takis,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Mario Uchimiya,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;David S. Wishart,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Ali Yılmaz,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Lloyd W. Sumner,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Robert Powers,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Valérie Copié,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Teklab Gebregiworgis*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Metabolomics is a rapidly growing multidisciplinary field with ever increasing demand and usability, which is attracting a surge of new researchers. While their varied skill sets, scientific questions, and approaches enrich the field with fresh perspectives and innovation, individual investigators also bring wide-ranging levels of metabolomics-specific experience and diverse areas of interest. These factors introduce considerable variability and inconsistency in both the methodology and reporting. A recent comparative literature review of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics from studies published in 2010 and 2020 revealed significant shortcomings in the reporting of experimental details necessary for evaluating both the scientific rigor and the reproducibility of NMR-based metabolomics experiments. Each stage of metabolomics research contains multiple methodological choices and various optimization parameters, all of which can introduce experimental bias and alter the study results. This emphasizes the need for proper reporting to enhance reproducibility, data reusability, and study comparability. To address these concerns, the NMR Special Interest Group within the Metabolomics Association of North America presents reporting recommendations focused on fundamental aspects of NMR metabolomics research identified from the detailed literature review report. These include specifics with respect to study design, sample preparation, data acquisition, data processing and analysis, data accessibility, and comparability to previous studies. Also presented is a complementary list of seminal papers in the field to guide the study design and implementation of NMR metabolomics experiments. This initiative seeks to enhance the long-term impact of NMR metabolomics by supporting high-quality, reproducible, and impactful data collected from well-executed and thoroughly reported studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"97 38","pages":"20655–20666"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03274","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03274","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metabolomics is a rapidly growing multidisciplinary field with ever increasing demand and usability, which is attracting a surge of new researchers. While their varied skill sets, scientific questions, and approaches enrich the field with fresh perspectives and innovation, individual investigators also bring wide-ranging levels of metabolomics-specific experience and diverse areas of interest. These factors introduce considerable variability and inconsistency in both the methodology and reporting. A recent comparative literature review of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics from studies published in 2010 and 2020 revealed significant shortcomings in the reporting of experimental details necessary for evaluating both the scientific rigor and the reproducibility of NMR-based metabolomics experiments. Each stage of metabolomics research contains multiple methodological choices and various optimization parameters, all of which can introduce experimental bias and alter the study results. This emphasizes the need for proper reporting to enhance reproducibility, data reusability, and study comparability. To address these concerns, the NMR Special Interest Group within the Metabolomics Association of North America presents reporting recommendations focused on fundamental aspects of NMR metabolomics research identified from the detailed literature review report. These include specifics with respect to study design, sample preparation, data acquisition, data processing and analysis, data accessibility, and comparability to previous studies. Also presented is a complementary list of seminal papers in the field to guide the study design and implementation of NMR metabolomics experiments. This initiative seeks to enhance the long-term impact of NMR metabolomics by supporting high-quality, reproducible, and impactful data collected from well-executed and thoroughly reported studies.

Abstract Image

确保核磁共振代谢组学可重复性的未来:要求标准化报告
代谢组学是一个快速发展的多学科领域,其需求和可用性不断提高,吸引了大量新的研究人员。虽然他们不同的技能,科学问题和方法丰富了新的观点和创新的领域,个人调查员也带来了代谢组学的具体经验和不同的兴趣领域的广泛水平。这些因素在方法和报告方面造成相当大的差异和不一致。最近对2010年和2020年发表的核磁共振(NMR)代谢组学研究的比较文献综述显示,在评估基于核磁共振的代谢组学实验的科学严谨性和可重复性所需的实验细节报告方面存在重大缺陷。代谢组学研究的每个阶段都包含多种方法选择和各种优化参数,这些都可能引入实验偏差并改变研究结果。这强调了适当报告的必要性,以增强再现性、数据可重用性和研究的可比性。为了解决这些问题,北美代谢组学协会的核磁共振特别兴趣小组提出了报告建议,重点关注从详细的文献回顾报告中确定的核磁共振代谢组学研究的基本方面。这些细节包括研究设计、样品制备、数据采集、数据处理和分析、数据可及性以及与以往研究的可比性。此外,还提供了该领域开创性论文的补充列表,以指导核磁共振代谢组学实验的研究设计和实施。该计划旨在通过支持高质量、可重复和有影响力的数据,从执行良好和全面报告的研究中收集,增强核磁共振代谢组学的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.20%
发文量
1949
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信