The effectiveness of interventions to improve environmentally sustainable and healthy dietary behaviours among European adults: a systematic review

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Hikaru Sato, John Oldroyd
{"title":"The effectiveness of interventions to improve environmentally sustainable and healthy dietary behaviours among European adults: a systematic review","authors":"Hikaru Sato,&nbsp;John Oldroyd","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current global food system poses risks to the environment and human health. In recent years, there has been vigorous activity in Europe to shift people toward sustainable and healthy dietary behaviours (SHDBs). However, existing research on the effectiveness of interventions to promote SHDBs is scattered and a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence across individual, interpersonal, organisational, community and policy levels is lacking. We conducted a systematic review which aimed to synthesise the evidence from research evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to improve SHDBs among European adults. Interventions included those which aimed to 1. Reduce animal-based food intake or choice, 2. Increase plant-based food intake or choice, 3. Increase the intake or choice of fruit and vegetables, 4. Increase the intake or choice of products with low GHG emissions, 5. Reduce food waste. After a comprehensive literature search, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies were considered at high risk of bias, six at moderate risk, and two at low risk of bias. Multi-level interventions that include individual, organisational and food environment levels in a range of food environment settings are likely to be effective strategies to improve SHDBs. Interventions that identify appropriate intervention points to match each specific food environment context and target population are also likely to promote SHDBs. Future research is needed to evaluate the impact of policy-level SHDBs interventions, which were not represented in this review. There will also need to be high-quality research to evaluate the longer-term effects of SHDBs interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 108302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325004556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current global food system poses risks to the environment and human health. In recent years, there has been vigorous activity in Europe to shift people toward sustainable and healthy dietary behaviours (SHDBs). However, existing research on the effectiveness of interventions to promote SHDBs is scattered and a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence across individual, interpersonal, organisational, community and policy levels is lacking. We conducted a systematic review which aimed to synthesise the evidence from research evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to improve SHDBs among European adults. Interventions included those which aimed to 1. Reduce animal-based food intake or choice, 2. Increase plant-based food intake or choice, 3. Increase the intake or choice of fruit and vegetables, 4. Increase the intake or choice of products with low GHG emissions, 5. Reduce food waste. After a comprehensive literature search, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies were considered at high risk of bias, six at moderate risk, and two at low risk of bias. Multi-level interventions that include individual, organisational and food environment levels in a range of food environment settings are likely to be effective strategies to improve SHDBs. Interventions that identify appropriate intervention points to match each specific food environment context and target population are also likely to promote SHDBs. Future research is needed to evaluate the impact of policy-level SHDBs interventions, which were not represented in this review. There will also need to be high-quality research to evaluate the longer-term effects of SHDBs interventions.
干预措施的有效性,以改善环境可持续和健康饮食行为的欧洲成年人:一个系统的审查。
当前的全球粮食系统对环境和人类健康构成风险。近年来,欧洲开展了积极的活动,促使人们转向可持续和健康的饮食行为(shdb)。然而,现有的关于促进小户型发展的干预措施有效性的研究是分散的,缺乏对个人、人际、组织、社区和政策层面证据的全面综合。我们进行了一项系统综述,旨在综合来自评估干预措施改善欧洲成年人shdb有效性的研究证据。干预措施包括:1。减少动物性食物的摄入或选择;2 .增加植物性食物的摄入或选择;3 .增加水果和蔬菜的摄入量或选择;4 .增加对低温室气体排放产品的摄入或选择;减少食物浪费。经综合文献检索,有17项研究符合纳入标准。9项研究被认为是高偏倚风险,6项为中等偏倚风险,2项为低偏倚风险。包括个人、组织和食品环境层面在内的多层次干预措施,在一系列食品环境背景下,可能是改善shdb的有效策略。确定适当的干预点以匹配每个特定的食物环境背景和目标人群的干预措施也可能促进shdb。未来的研究需要评估政策层面的shdb干预措施的影响,这在本综述中没有体现。还需要进行高质量的研究,以评估shdb干预措施的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信