Evaluation of Generative AI Use to Foster Critical Thinking in Higher Education

IF 1 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Luis Magdiel Oliva-Córdova;Inés Álvarez-Icaza;Carlos Enrique George-Reyes
{"title":"Evaluation of Generative AI Use to Foster Critical Thinking in Higher Education","authors":"Luis Magdiel Oliva-Córdova;Inés Álvarez-Icaza;Carlos Enrique George-Reyes","doi":"10.1109/RITA.2025.3597848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical thinking is a key competency in higher education, particularly in digital environments that demand analysis, judgment, and informed decision-making. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) represents an emerging opportunity to enhance complex cognitive skills in educational settings. A quasi-experimental research design with a mixed-methods approach was employed and applied to a sample of university students aiming to address the research question: What is the impact of using GenAI tools on the development of critical thinking in university students? The educational intervention consisted of structured workshops that incorporated GenAI tools into activities aimed at developing six dimensions of critical thinking: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. Results showed significant improvements in applying (p =.002), analyzing (p =.0008), and evaluating (p =.003), all associated with higher-order thinking skills. Three dimensions -remembering, understanding, and creating- showed statistically significant changes. However, students’ perception showed a notable increase in the value of GenAI use. Additionally, participants highlighted the usefulness of GenAI for generating ideas, decision making, and promoting deeper reflections. The study concludes that the intentional integration of GenAI technologies, when aligned with clear educational goals, can produce a meaningful and positive impact on the development of critical thinking in university contexts. These findings offer empirical support for designing innovative, ethically grounded learning experiences that incorporate GenAI to strengthen cognitive development in higher education.","PeriodicalId":38963,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje","volume":"20 ","pages":"237-243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11122480/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critical thinking is a key competency in higher education, particularly in digital environments that demand analysis, judgment, and informed decision-making. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) represents an emerging opportunity to enhance complex cognitive skills in educational settings. A quasi-experimental research design with a mixed-methods approach was employed and applied to a sample of university students aiming to address the research question: What is the impact of using GenAI tools on the development of critical thinking in university students? The educational intervention consisted of structured workshops that incorporated GenAI tools into activities aimed at developing six dimensions of critical thinking: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. Results showed significant improvements in applying (p =.002), analyzing (p =.0008), and evaluating (p =.003), all associated with higher-order thinking skills. Three dimensions -remembering, understanding, and creating- showed statistically significant changes. However, students’ perception showed a notable increase in the value of GenAI use. Additionally, participants highlighted the usefulness of GenAI for generating ideas, decision making, and promoting deeper reflections. The study concludes that the intentional integration of GenAI technologies, when aligned with clear educational goals, can produce a meaningful and positive impact on the development of critical thinking in university contexts. These findings offer empirical support for designing innovative, ethically grounded learning experiences that incorporate GenAI to strengthen cognitive development in higher education.
高等教育中使用生成式人工智能培养批判性思维的评估
批判性思维是高等教育的关键能力,尤其是在需要分析、判断和明智决策的数字环境中。生成式人工智能(GenAI)代表了在教育环境中提高复杂认知技能的一个新兴机会。采用混合方法的准实验研究设计,并将其应用于大学生样本,旨在解决研究问题:使用GenAI工具对大学生批判性思维发展的影响是什么?教育干预包括结构化的研讨会,将GenAI工具纳入旨在发展批判性思维六个维度的活动:记忆、理解、应用、分析、评估和创造。结果显示,应用(p = 0.002)、分析(p = 0.008)和评估(p = 0.003)方面都有显著改善,这些都与高阶思维技能有关。三个维度——记忆、理解和创造——在统计上显示出显著的变化。然而,学生的感知显示GenAI使用的价值显著增加。此外,与会者还强调了GenAI在产生想法、制定决策和促进更深层次思考方面的有用性。该研究的结论是,有意整合GenAI技术,如果与明确的教育目标相结合,可以对大学环境下批判性思维的发展产生有意义和积极的影响。这些发现为设计创新的、基于伦理的学习体验提供了实证支持,这些学习体验将GenAI纳入其中,以加强高等教育中的认知发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信