Synergizing PAD and BOPPPS: a teaching model's application in health assessment course

IF 1.7 Q2 NURSING
Qiuling Wang PhD , Zhiling Sun PhD , Danwen Wang PhD , Lei Cao PhD
{"title":"Synergizing PAD and BOPPPS: a teaching model's application in health assessment course","authors":"Qiuling Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Zhiling Sun PhD ,&nbsp;Danwen Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Lei Cao PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2025.07.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the educational impact of amalgamating the presentation-assimilation-discussion (PAD) and Bridge-in, Objective, Preassessment, Participatory learning, Postassessment, and Summary (BOPPPS) teaching models within the health assessment curriculum.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>For nursing students, developing expertise in physical examination is essential and hinges on their ability to integrate substantial theoretical knowledge with sharp clinical diagnosis. At the novice stage, the students confront the challenge of integrating a vast spectrum of multidisciplinary concepts, often leading to learner burnout. The breadth and intricacy of diseases further complicate teaching efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This study has a randomized controlled design.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We assessed 274 nursing undergraduates from Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, allocating them into a control group, which followed conventional teaching practices, and an experimental group immersed in the PAD and BOPPPS methodologies. Comparative analyses of chapter test scores, group report evaluations, and survey responses were conducted using an unpaired student's t-test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Notably, the experimental cohort outperformed the control group in chapter tests and group reports (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Additionally, they showcased superior self-directed learning and critical thinking skills, as indicated by the survey (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The novel integration of PAD and BOPPPS teaching frameworks in health assessment courses significantly benefits nursing students’ academic performance and cultivates their self-learning and critical thinking faculties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 4","pages":"Pages e1252-e1258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155730872500215X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the educational impact of amalgamating the presentation-assimilation-discussion (PAD) and Bridge-in, Objective, Preassessment, Participatory learning, Postassessment, and Summary (BOPPPS) teaching models within the health assessment curriculum.

Background

For nursing students, developing expertise in physical examination is essential and hinges on their ability to integrate substantial theoretical knowledge with sharp clinical diagnosis. At the novice stage, the students confront the challenge of integrating a vast spectrum of multidisciplinary concepts, often leading to learner burnout. The breadth and intricacy of diseases further complicate teaching efficacy.

Design

This study has a randomized controlled design.

Methods

We assessed 274 nursing undergraduates from Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, allocating them into a control group, which followed conventional teaching practices, and an experimental group immersed in the PAD and BOPPPS methodologies. Comparative analyses of chapter test scores, group report evaluations, and survey responses were conducted using an unpaired student's t-test.

Results

Notably, the experimental cohort outperformed the control group in chapter tests and group reports (p < 0.05). Additionally, they showcased superior self-directed learning and critical thinking skills, as indicated by the survey (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The novel integration of PAD and BOPPPS teaching frameworks in health assessment courses significantly benefits nursing students’ academic performance and cultivates their self-learning and critical thinking faculties.
协同PAD与BOPPPS:一种健康评估课程教学模式的应用
目的本研究旨在评估在健康评估课程中整合陈述-同化-讨论(PAD)与介入、客观、预评、参与式学习、后评和总结(BOPPPS)教学模式的教育效果。对于护理专业的学生来说,发展体格检查的专业知识是必不可少的,这取决于他们将大量的理论知识与敏锐的临床诊断相结合的能力。在初学者阶段,学生面临着整合大量多学科概念的挑战,这往往导致学习者倦怠。疾病的广泛性和复杂性进一步使教学效果复杂化。设计本研究采用随机对照设计。方法对南京中医药大学护理本科生274名进行评估,将其分为对照组和实验组,对照组采用传统教学方法,实验组采用PAD和BOPPPS教学方法。采用非配对学生t检验对章节测试成绩、小组报告评估和调查反应进行了比较分析。结果实验组在章节检验和分组报告上均优于对照组(p < 0.05)。此外,调查显示,他们表现出卓越的自主学习和批判性思维技能(p < 0.05)。结论PAD与BOPPPS教学框架在健康评估课程中的新颖整合,显著提高了护生的学习成绩,培养了他们的自主学习能力和批判性思维能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信