Towards ritual intervention in meat consumption practices: The case of meat in Dutch Christmas meals

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Nemo Koning , Hilje van der Horst , Mijs Besseling , Mirella Klomp , Peter-Ben Smit , Hester Dibbits
{"title":"Towards ritual intervention in meat consumption practices: The case of meat in Dutch Christmas meals","authors":"Nemo Koning ,&nbsp;Hilje van der Horst ,&nbsp;Mijs Besseling ,&nbsp;Mirella Klomp ,&nbsp;Peter-Ben Smit ,&nbsp;Hester Dibbits","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Meat consumption is widely recognized as socially and culturally embedded, yet sociocultural intervention strategies to reduce meat-eating practices remain underdeveloped. This article aims to help fill this research gap by combining insights from social practice theory, ritual studies, and cultural sociology in order to explore ‘ritual intervention’ strategies. While interventions are usually thought of as initiated from the outside, this article capitalizes on the fact that people both reproduce practices and are able to initiate change through their performance. Using a co-creative approach, we invited young adults to intervene in their Christmas meal in ways that reduce meat consumption and to keep a logbook of their experiences. The logbooks were also used for follow-up interviews. The data were analyzed thematically, to identify distinct intervention strategies. The results show that research participants were able to reduce meat consumption by creatively and often unobtrusively renegotiating the centrality of meat, the ownership of the meal, and the ways in which commensality was achieved. On the other hand, participants found they could not interfere with important values, meanings and objectives associated with meat. Based on this case study, we conclude by articulating lessons for ritual intervention strategies in consumption practices. Such a strategy takes a bottom-up approach, capitalizes on the potential for change through performance, maintains the integrity of practices and identifies entry points for change in the ritual nature of consumption practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 108300"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325004532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meat consumption is widely recognized as socially and culturally embedded, yet sociocultural intervention strategies to reduce meat-eating practices remain underdeveloped. This article aims to help fill this research gap by combining insights from social practice theory, ritual studies, and cultural sociology in order to explore ‘ritual intervention’ strategies. While interventions are usually thought of as initiated from the outside, this article capitalizes on the fact that people both reproduce practices and are able to initiate change through their performance. Using a co-creative approach, we invited young adults to intervene in their Christmas meal in ways that reduce meat consumption and to keep a logbook of their experiences. The logbooks were also used for follow-up interviews. The data were analyzed thematically, to identify distinct intervention strategies. The results show that research participants were able to reduce meat consumption by creatively and often unobtrusively renegotiating the centrality of meat, the ownership of the meal, and the ways in which commensality was achieved. On the other hand, participants found they could not interfere with important values, meanings and objectives associated with meat. Based on this case study, we conclude by articulating lessons for ritual intervention strategies in consumption practices. Such a strategy takes a bottom-up approach, capitalizes on the potential for change through performance, maintains the integrity of practices and identifies entry points for change in the ritual nature of consumption practices.
对肉类消费实践的仪式干预:荷兰圣诞餐中的肉的情况。
肉类消费被广泛认为是社会和文化的一部分,但减少吃肉行为的社会文化干预策略仍然不发达。本文旨在结合社会实践理论、仪式研究和文化社会学的见解,探索“仪式干预”策略,以填补这一研究空白。虽然干预通常被认为是从外部发起的,但本文利用了这样一个事实,即人们既可以复制实践,又可以通过他们的表现发起变化。通过一种共同创造的方式,我们邀请年轻人以减少肉类消费的方式干预他们的圣诞大餐,并将他们的经历记录下来。日志也用于后续访谈。对数据进行主题分析,以确定不同的干预策略。研究结果表明,研究参与者能够通过创造性地、通常不引人注目地重新协商肉类的中心地位、膳食的所有权以及实现共生的方式来减少肉类消费。另一方面,参与者发现他们不能干涉与肉有关的重要价值观、意义和目标。基于这一案例研究,我们总结了消费实践中仪式干预策略的经验教训。这种策略采用自底向上的方法,利用通过绩效进行变更的潜力,维护实践的完整性,并确定消费实践的仪式性质中的变更入口点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信