Navigating the Nutri-Score: Inequidistant Perceptions of Front-of-Package Health Information

IF 6.9 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Food frontiers Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI:10.1002/fft2.70081
Philipp Sprengholz, Anna Tabea Feifel, Babett Reich, Antonia Sahler
{"title":"Navigating the Nutri-Score: Inequidistant Perceptions of Front-of-Package Health Information","authors":"Philipp Sprengholz,&nbsp;Anna Tabea Feifel,&nbsp;Babett Reich,&nbsp;Antonia Sahler","doi":"10.1002/fft2.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Nutri-Score is a front-of-package label designed to guide consumers toward healthier food choices, using letters A (indicating <i>high nutritional quality</i>) to E (indicating <i>low nutritional quality</i>). While many studies have assessed the impact on food consumption, little research has explored how the label is perceived. To address this gap, two online studies with representative samples from Germany investigated whether differences between neighboring Nutri-Scores are perceived as equidistant. Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 562) assessed perceived healthiness across the Nutri-Score scale, revealing a middle-of-scale effect, where differences between mid-range scores appeared larger than those at the extremes. Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 319) used a discrete choice experiment with products varying in price and Nutri-Score. While participants were more willing to pay for an improvement from C to B than from B to A, a different pattern emerged at the lower end of the scale, where consumers prioritized avoiding the lowest-rated products. These findings highlight the need for public education on the Nutri-Score's interpretation. They may also inform potential revisions to the label and contribute to broader public health strategies, such as food taxation policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73042,"journal":{"name":"Food frontiers","volume":"6 5","pages":"2485-2491"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://iadns.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fft2.70081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://iadns.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fft2.70081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Nutri-Score is a front-of-package label designed to guide consumers toward healthier food choices, using letters A (indicating high nutritional quality) to E (indicating low nutritional quality). While many studies have assessed the impact on food consumption, little research has explored how the label is perceived. To address this gap, two online studies with representative samples from Germany investigated whether differences between neighboring Nutri-Scores are perceived as equidistant. Study 1 (N = 562) assessed perceived healthiness across the Nutri-Score scale, revealing a middle-of-scale effect, where differences between mid-range scores appeared larger than those at the extremes. Study 2 (N = 319) used a discrete choice experiment with products varying in price and Nutri-Score. While participants were more willing to pay for an improvement from C to B than from B to A, a different pattern emerged at the lower end of the scale, where consumers prioritized avoiding the lowest-rated products. These findings highlight the need for public education on the Nutri-Score's interpretation. They may also inform potential revisions to the label and contribute to broader public health strategies, such as food taxation policies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

导航营养评分:包装前健康信息的不平等感知
nutrition - score是一个包装正面标签,旨在引导消费者选择更健康的食品,使用字母a(表示高营养质量)到E(表示低营养质量)。虽然有许多研究评估了这种标签对食品消费的影响,但很少有研究探讨人们如何看待这种标签。为了解决这一差距,两项来自德国的代表性样本的在线研究调查了相邻营养评分之间的差异是否被视为等距。研究1 (N = 562)通过营养评分量表评估感知健康状况,揭示了一种中档效应,中档评分之间的差异似乎大于极端评分之间的差异。研究2 (N = 319)采用价格和营养评分不同的产品进行离散选择实验。虽然参与者更愿意为从C到B的改进付费,而不是从B到A,但在较低端出现了不同的模式,消费者优先避免评级最低的产品。这些发现强调了对营养评分的解释进行公众教育的必要性。它们还可能为标签的潜在修订提供信息,并有助于制定更广泛的公共卫生战略,如食品税收政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信