Correction to “Glutathione-Induced Hydrogen Sulfide Enhances Drought Tolerance in Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

IF 4.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
{"title":"Correction to “Glutathione-Induced Hydrogen Sulfide Enhances Drought Tolerance in Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Kaya, C., and F. Uğurlar 2024. “Glutathione-Induced Hydrogen Sulfide Enhances Drought Tolerance in Sweet Pepper (<i>Capsicum annuum</i> L.).” <i>Food and Energy Security</i> 13: e559. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.559.</p><p>In the published version of the above article, the authors noticed an error in <b>Figure 1b,c</b>. The incorrect version of Figure 1b,c was inadvertently included. The corrected version of Figure 1b,c are provided below.</p><p>In <b>Section 3.1, “Impact of GSH on visual symptoms and canopy temperature under water stress,”</b> the reported canopy temperature values were inconsistent with the corrected Figure 1c. To show the minor nature of the correction, both the original and corrected sentences are provided:</p><p>\n <i>Original sentence:</i>\n </p><p>“In particular, the foliar temperatures of the water-stressed plants rose from 30.7°C to 34.6°C. GSH application alone or combined with NaHS reduced the canopy temperature to 32.4 and 31.7°C, respectively. However, when HT pre-treatment was combined with GSH, it led to an increase in canopy temperature to 34.1°C, while the application of NaHS in conjunction with GSH + HT nullified the effect of HT, resulting in a reduction of canopy temperature to 32.6°C.”</p><p>\n <i>Corrected sentence:</i>\n </p><p>“In particular, the foliar temperatures of the water-stressed plants rose from <b>29.2°</b>C to <b>33.1</b>°C. GSH application alone or combined with NaHS reduced the canopy temperature to <b>30.7</b>°C and <b>29.7</b>°C, respectively. However, when HT pre-treatment was combined with GSH, it led to an increase in canopy temperature to <b>33.5</b>°C, while the application of NaHS in conjunction with GSH + HT nullified the effect of HT, resulting in a reduction of canopy temperature to <b>30.5</b>°C.”</p><p>These corrections do <b>not</b> affect the results, interpretations, or conclusions presented in the article.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70136","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Energy Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.70136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kaya, C., and F. Uğurlar 2024. “Glutathione-Induced Hydrogen Sulfide Enhances Drought Tolerance in Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.).” Food and Energy Security 13: e559. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.559.

In the published version of the above article, the authors noticed an error in Figure 1b,c. The incorrect version of Figure 1b,c was inadvertently included. The corrected version of Figure 1b,c are provided below.

In Section 3.1, “Impact of GSH on visual symptoms and canopy temperature under water stress,” the reported canopy temperature values were inconsistent with the corrected Figure 1c. To show the minor nature of the correction, both the original and corrected sentences are provided:

Original sentence:

“In particular, the foliar temperatures of the water-stressed plants rose from 30.7°C to 34.6°C. GSH application alone or combined with NaHS reduced the canopy temperature to 32.4 and 31.7°C, respectively. However, when HT pre-treatment was combined with GSH, it led to an increase in canopy temperature to 34.1°C, while the application of NaHS in conjunction with GSH + HT nullified the effect of HT, resulting in a reduction of canopy temperature to 32.6°C.”

Corrected sentence:

“In particular, the foliar temperatures of the water-stressed plants rose from 29.2°C to 33.1°C. GSH application alone or combined with NaHS reduced the canopy temperature to 30.7°C and 29.7°C, respectively. However, when HT pre-treatment was combined with GSH, it led to an increase in canopy temperature to 33.5°C, while the application of NaHS in conjunction with GSH + HT nullified the effect of HT, resulting in a reduction of canopy temperature to 30.5°C.”

These corrections do not affect the results, interpretations, or conclusions presented in the article.

We apologize for this error.

Abstract Image

更正“谷胱甘肽诱导的硫化氢增强甜椒(Capsicum annuum L.)的耐旱性”
卡亚,C.和F. Uğurlar 2024。谷胱甘肽诱导的硫化氢增强甜椒(辣椒)的抗旱性粮食与能源安全[j];在上述文章的已发表版本https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.559.In中,作者注意到图1b、c中的一个错误。无意中包含了图1b,c的错误版本。图1b、c的更正版本如下:在第3.1节“水胁迫下谷胱甘肽对视觉症状和冠层温度的影响”中,报告的冠层温度值与修正后的图1c不一致。为了表明修正的轻微性,提供了原句和修正句:原句:“特别是,缺水植物的叶温从30.7°C上升到34.6°C。单独施用谷胱甘肽或联合施用NaHS可使冠层温度分别降至32.4°C和31.7°C。然而,当HT预处理与GSH联合使用时,导致冠层温度升高到34.1℃,而NaHS与GSH + HT联合使用则抵消了HT的作用,导致冠层温度降低到32.6℃。”特别是,缺水植物的叶温从29.2°C上升到33.1°C。单独施用谷胱甘肽或联合施用NaHS可使冠层温度分别降至30.7°C和29.7°C。然而,当高温预处理与GSH联合使用时,导致冠层温度升高到33.5℃,而NaHS与GSH + HT联合使用则抵消了高温的作用,导致冠层温度降低到30.5℃。”这些更正不影响文章中呈现的结果、解释或结论。我们为这个错误道歉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Energy Security
Food and Energy Security Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Food and Energy Security seeks to publish high quality and high impact original research on agricultural crop and forest productivity to improve food and energy security. It actively seeks submissions from emerging countries with expanding agricultural research communities. Papers from China, other parts of Asia, India and South America are particularly welcome. The Editorial Board, headed by Editor-in-Chief Professor Martin Parry, is determined to make FES the leading publication in its sector and will be aiming for a top-ranking impact factor. Primary research articles should report hypothesis driven investigations that provide new insights into mechanisms and processes that determine productivity and properties for exploitation. Review articles are welcome but they must be critical in approach and provide particularly novel and far reaching insights. Food and Energy Security offers authors a forum for the discussion of the most important advances in this field and promotes an integrative approach of scientific disciplines. Papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge. Examples of areas covered in Food and Energy Security include: • Agronomy • Biotechnological Approaches • Breeding & Genetics • Climate Change • Quality and Composition • Food Crops and Bioenergy Feedstocks • Developmental, Physiology and Biochemistry • Functional Genomics • Molecular Biology • Pest and Disease Management • Post Harvest Biology • Soil Science • Systems Biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信