Cognitive load suppresses explicit learning while sparing implicit learning in visuomotor adaptation.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-09 DOI:10.1152/jn.00262.2025
Xiaoyue Zhang, Tianyang Zhang, Kunlin Wei
{"title":"Cognitive load suppresses explicit learning while sparing implicit learning in visuomotor adaptation.","authors":"Xiaoyue Zhang, Tianyang Zhang, Kunlin Wei","doi":"10.1152/jn.00262.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Limiting cognitive resources negatively impacts motor learning, but its cognitive mechanism is still unclear. Previous studies failed to differentiate its effect on explicit (or cognitive) and implicit (or procedural) aspects of motor learning. Here, we designed a dual-task paradigm requiring participants to simultaneously perform a visual working memory task and a visuomotor rotation adaptation task to investigate how cognitive load differentially impacted explicit and implicit motor learning. Over the three consecutive learning days, the control group without the dual task showed an increase in explicit learning and a decrease in implicit learning. In contrast, cognitive load, implemented by the dual task in the experimental group, selectively impaired explicit learning but spared implicit motor learning. Individual analysis uncovered a negative correlation between explicit learning and working memory performance, suggesting a trade-off between motor and cognitive tasks that compete for cognitive resources. Importantly, moderation analysis revealed that the relative increase in implicit learning was not directly influenced by cognitive load but rather indirectly by the changes in explicit learning. Specifically, individuals with more suppression in explicit learning from the dual task exhibited higher implicit learning. Our findings provide new insights into how cognitive load differentially affects explicit and implicit motor learning, as well as the interaction between explicit and implicit learning systems.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Motor skill acquisition is ubiquitously accompanied by cognitive load, yet its effects on motor learning remain understudied. Using a dual-task paradigm combining visual working memory and visuomotor adaptation, we found a striking dissociation: cognitive load suppresses explicit learning while paradoxically enhancing implicit learning. This enhancement can be explained by the compensatory relationship between explicit and implicit systems, rather than direct facilitation. Our findings revealed how the motor learning system adaptively reorganized under cognitive constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1133-1145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00262.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limiting cognitive resources negatively impacts motor learning, but its cognitive mechanism is still unclear. Previous studies failed to differentiate its effect on explicit (or cognitive) and implicit (or procedural) aspects of motor learning. Here, we designed a dual-task paradigm requiring participants to simultaneously perform a visual working memory task and a visuomotor rotation adaptation task to investigate how cognitive load differentially impacted explicit and implicit motor learning. Over the three consecutive learning days, the control group without the dual task showed an increase in explicit learning and a decrease in implicit learning. In contrast, cognitive load, implemented by the dual task in the experimental group, selectively impaired explicit learning but spared implicit motor learning. Individual analysis uncovered a negative correlation between explicit learning and working memory performance, suggesting a trade-off between motor and cognitive tasks that compete for cognitive resources. Importantly, moderation analysis revealed that the relative increase in implicit learning was not directly influenced by cognitive load but rather indirectly by the changes in explicit learning. Specifically, individuals with more suppression in explicit learning from the dual task exhibited higher implicit learning. Our findings provide new insights into how cognitive load differentially affects explicit and implicit motor learning, as well as the interaction between explicit and implicit learning systems.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Motor skill acquisition is ubiquitously accompanied by cognitive load, yet its effects on motor learning remain understudied. Using a dual-task paradigm combining visual working memory and visuomotor adaptation, we found a striking dissociation: cognitive load suppresses explicit learning while paradoxically enhancing implicit learning. This enhancement can be explained by the compensatory relationship between explicit and implicit systems, rather than direct facilitation. Our findings revealed how the motor learning system adaptively reorganized under cognitive constraints.

认知负荷在视觉运动适应中抑制外显学习,保留内隐学习。
限制认知资源对运动学习有负面影响,但其认知机制尚不清楚。以往的研究未能区分其对运动学习的外显(或认知)和内隐(或程序)方面的影响。在此,我们设计了一个双任务范式,要求参与者同时执行视觉工作记忆任务和视觉运动旋转适应任务,以研究认知负荷对外显和内隐运动学习的差异影响。在连续三天的学习中,没有双重任务的对照组表现出外显学习的增加和内隐学习的减少。相比之下,在实验组中,双重任务的认知负荷选择性地损害了外显学习,但对内隐运动学习没有影响。个体分析揭示了外显学习和工作记忆表现之间的负相关,这表明运动任务和认知任务之间存在权衡关系,这些任务会争夺认知资源。重要的是,调节分析表明,内隐学习的相对增加并不直接受到认知负荷的影响,而是间接受到外显学习变化的影响。具体而言,在双重任务中外显学习受到抑制的个体表现出更高的内隐学习。我们的研究结果为认知负荷如何影响外显和内隐运动学习以及外显和内隐学习系统之间的相互作用提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信