Sensory processing patterns in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal study.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Marilien C Marzolla, Christine Resch, Petra Hurks, Jan Schepers, Lex Borghans, Andre Rietman, Caroline van Heugten, Irene Renaud
{"title":"Sensory processing patterns in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal study.","authors":"Marilien C Marzolla, Christine Resch, Petra Hurks, Jan Schepers, Lex Borghans, Andre Rietman, Caroline van Heugten, Irene Renaud","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2025.2549930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sensory processing (SP) difficulties, such as heightened sensitivity to sensory input, have been linked to prolonged recovery and persistent post-concussive symptoms in adults following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). However, research on SP across different sensory inputs after pediatric mTBI is limited. This study examined SP patterns in children and adolescents aged 6-17 years with mTBI at 2 weeks and 6 months post-injury. Caregivers of children aged 6-11 years (<i>n</i> = 120) completed the Short Sensory Profile - Dutch version (SSP-NL), while adolescents aged 12-17 years (<i>n</i> = 121) completed the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile - Dutch version (AASP-NL), and scores were compared to normative data. Multilevel latent class growth analysis (MLCGA) identified four SP classes in children: (1) taste and smell sensitivity, (2) general hypersensitivity, (3) general hyposensitivity, and (4) under responsiveness with auditory filtering issues. Class 2 showed lower Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP) scores. SP changes over time were limited, with persistent issues (of hyper- and hyposensitivity) at 6 months. For adolescents, two classes were found: (1) avoidant and passive, and (2) mild, with Class 1 showing lower CASP scores. Class 2 exhibited reductions in poor registration, sensory sensitivity, and sensation avoidance over time. These findings highlight inter-individual differences in SP after pediatric mTBI, with subgroups differing in how they affect activities and participation. Early identification of SP issues may help tailor more effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2025.2549930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sensory processing (SP) difficulties, such as heightened sensitivity to sensory input, have been linked to prolonged recovery and persistent post-concussive symptoms in adults following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). However, research on SP across different sensory inputs after pediatric mTBI is limited. This study examined SP patterns in children and adolescents aged 6-17 years with mTBI at 2 weeks and 6 months post-injury. Caregivers of children aged 6-11 years (n = 120) completed the Short Sensory Profile - Dutch version (SSP-NL), while adolescents aged 12-17 years (n = 121) completed the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile - Dutch version (AASP-NL), and scores were compared to normative data. Multilevel latent class growth analysis (MLCGA) identified four SP classes in children: (1) taste and smell sensitivity, (2) general hypersensitivity, (3) general hyposensitivity, and (4) under responsiveness with auditory filtering issues. Class 2 showed lower Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP) scores. SP changes over time were limited, with persistent issues (of hyper- and hyposensitivity) at 6 months. For adolescents, two classes were found: (1) avoidant and passive, and (2) mild, with Class 1 showing lower CASP scores. Class 2 exhibited reductions in poor registration, sensory sensitivity, and sensation avoidance over time. These findings highlight inter-individual differences in SP after pediatric mTBI, with subgroups differing in how they affect activities and participation. Early identification of SP issues may help tailor more effective interventions.

儿童轻度创伤性脑损伤的感觉处理模式:一项纵向研究。
感觉处理(SP)困难,如对感觉输入的高度敏感性,与轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后成人恢复时间延长和持续震荡后症状有关。然而,对儿童mTBI后不同感觉输入的SP的研究有限。本研究检查了6-17岁mTBI儿童和青少年在损伤后2周和6个月的SP模式。6-11岁儿童的照顾者(n = 120)完成了荷兰版短感官描述(SSP-NL),而12-17岁的青少年(n = 121)完成了青少年/成人感官描述-荷兰版(AASP-NL),并将得分与规范数据进行比较。多水平潜在类别生长分析(MLCGA)确定了儿童的四个SP类别:(1)味觉和嗅觉敏感,(2)一般超敏,(3)一般低敏,(4)听觉过滤问题的反应性低下。2班儿童与青少年参与量表(CASP)得分较低。SP随时间的变化有限,在6个月时出现持续问题(高敏感和低敏感)。对于青少年,发现了两类:(1)回避型和被动型;(2)轻度型,其中1类的CASP得分较低。随着时间的推移,2级表现出不良定位、感觉敏感性和感觉回避的减少。这些发现强调了儿童mTBI后SP的个体差异,亚组在如何影响活动和参与方面存在差异。早期识别SP问题可能有助于制定更有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信